World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
105
Citations
34426
World Ranking
1029
National Ranking
52

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
104
Citations
33954
World Ranking
121
National Ranking
6

Keith Scott publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Scott sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 539 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Keith Scott D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Scott sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Keith Scott is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, chiefly focused on engineering, energy, and environmental science. More specifically, their work extensively covers electrical and electronic engineering, environmental engineering, renewable energy, sustainability, and environments related to catalysis and electronic, optical, and magnetic materials.

They have contributed to various topics including microbial fuel cells and bioremediation, electrochemical sensors and biosensors, fuel cells and related materials, electrocatalysts for energy conversion, advanced battery technologies research, supercapacitor materials and fabrication, and electrochemical analysis and applications.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Keith Scott include:

  • A review of proton exchange membranes based on protic ionic liquid/polymer blends for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells, 2020, Journal of Power Sources
  • Integrated air cathode microbial fuel cell-aerobic bioreactor set-up for enhanced bioelectrodegradation of azo dye Acid Blue 29, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Zinc removal and recovery from industrial wastewater with a microbial fuel cell: Experimental investigation and theoretical prediction, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Applications of poly ionic liquids in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: A review, 2021, Journal of Power Sources
  • Gel-Polymer Electrolytes Based on Poly(Ionic Liquid)/Ionic Liquid Networks, 2020, ACS Applied Polymer Materials

Keith Scott frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • Journal of Power Sources
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • ECS Meeting Abstracts

Collaborations are notable in their work, with frequent co-authors such as Mohamed Mamlouk, Eileen Hao Yu, Ravikumar Thimmappa, Da Li, and Ian M. Head. The counts of collaborations with these co-authors range from three to eight instances.

Best Publications

  • Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems

    JR John Varcoe;Plamen Atanassov;Dario Dekel;AM Andrew Herring

  • Electricity generation from cysteine in a microbial fuel cell.

    Bruce E. Logan;Cassandro Murano;Keith Scott;Neil D. Gray

  • A computational model for biofilm-based microbial fuel cells.

    Cristian Picioreanu;Ian M. Head;Krishna P. Katuri;Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht

  • The degree and effect of methanol crossover in the direct methanol fuel cell

    John Cruickshank;Keith Scott

  • Principles and materials aspects of direct alkaline alcohol fuel cells

    Eileen Hao Yu;Ulrike Krewer;Ulrike Krewer;Keith Scott

  • The impact of mass transport and methanol crossover on the direct methanol fuel cell

    K. Scott;W. M. Taama;P. Argyropoulos;K. Sundmacher;K. Sundmacher

  • Microbial fuel cell performance with non-Pt cathode catalysts

    Eileen HaoYu;Shaoan Cheng;Keith Scott;Bruce Logan

  • Performance and modelling of a direct methanol solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell

    K. Scott;W. Taama;J. Cruickshank

  • Carbon-supported manganese oxide nanocatalysts for rechargeable lithium–air batteries

    H. Cheng;K. Scott

  • A single-chamber microbial fuel cell as a biosensor for wastewaters.

    Mirella Di Lorenzo;Tom P. Curtis;Ian M. Head;Keith Scott

  • Engineering aspects of the direct methanol fuel cell system

    K. Scott;W.M. Taama;P. Argyropoulos

  • Effect of temperature on the performance of microbial fuel cells

    A. Larrosa-Guerrero;A. Larrosa-Guerrero;K. Scott;I.M. Head;F. Mateo

  • Dynamic modeling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen production

    A. Awasthi;Keith Scott;S. Basu

  • Development of direct methanol alkaline fuel cells using anion exchange membranes

    Eileen Hao Yu;Keith Scott

  • Production of hydrogen from domestic wastewater in a pilot-scale microbial electrolysis cell.

    Elizabeth Heidrich;Jan Dolfing;Keith Scott;Stephen Edwards

  • Leaching and electrochemical recovery of copper, lead and tin from scrap printed circuit boards

    Andrea Mecucci;Keith Scott

  • Direct oxidation alkaline fuel cells: from materials to systems

    Eileen Hao Yu;Xu Wang;Ulrike Krewer;Ulrike Krewer;Lei Li

  • A two-phase flow and non-isothermal agglomerate model for a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell

    Lei Xing;Lei Xing;Xiaoteng Liu;Taiwo Alaje;Ravi Kumar

  • Dynamics of the direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC): experiments and model-based analysis

    Kai Sundmacher;Kai Sundmacher;Thorsten Schultz;S. Zhou;K. Scott

  • A study of the anodic oxidation of methanol on Pt in alkaline solutions

    Eileen Hao Yu;Keith Scott;Robert W. Reeve

  • Cross-Linked Polymer-Ionic Liquid Composite Materials

    Peter Snedden;Andrew I. Cooper;Keith Scott;Neil Winterton

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed Mamlouk
Mohamed Mamlouk Newcastle University
Ian M. Head
Ian M. Head Newcastle University
Thomas P. Curtis
Thomas P. Curtis Newcastle University
Paul A. Christensen
Paul A. Christensen Newcastle University
Kai Sundmacher
Kai Sundmacher Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
James H. Clark
James H. Clark University of York
Makarand M. Ghangrekar
Makarand M. Ghangrekar Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Suddhasatwa Basu
Suddhasatwa Basu Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Jhuma Sadhukhan
Jhuma Sadhukhan University of Surrey
Thandavarayan Maiyalagan
Thandavarayan Maiyalagan SRM Institute of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Keith Scott

Trending Scientists