World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
7175
World Ranking
9685
National Ranking
86

Chin-Laung Lei publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chin-Laung Lei sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chin-Laung Lei D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chin-Laung Lei sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chin-Laung Lei is affiliated with National Taiwan University in Taiwan, focusing research primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their research topics cover a range of areas centered on security and system technologies. Key subjects include:

  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Software Engineering Research

Chin-Laung Lei has published articles in several reputable venues, with frequent publications in:

  • IEEE Access
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • Digital Threats Research and Practice
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • International Journal of Communication Systems

Their notable papers include:

  • PUF Based Authenticated Key Exchange Protocol for IoT Without Verifiers and Explicit CRPs (2021, IEEE Access)
  • Guided Malware Sample Analysis Based on Graph Neural Networks (2023, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security)
  • PowerDP: De-Obfuscating and Profiling Malicious PowerShell Commands With Multi-Label Classifiers (2022, IEEE Access)
  • Building Machine Learning-based Threat Hunting System from Scratch (2021, Digital Threats Research and Practice)
  • Joint Feature Disentanglement and Hallucination for Few-Shot Image Classification (2021, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing)

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Yun-Hsin Chuang
  • Chia-Ching Lin
  • Si-Chen Lin
  • Szu-Chun Huang
  • Chun-Ying Huang

Best Publications

  • EFFICIENT MODEL CHECKING IN FRAGMENTS OF THE PROPOSITIONAL MU-CALCULUS.

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin Laung Lei

  • Modalities for model checking: branching time logic strikes back

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Quantifying Skype user satisfaction

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Chun-Ying Huang;Polly Huang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Game traffic analysis: an MMORPG perspective

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Polly Huang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • An efficient and anonymous buyer-seller watermarking protocol

    Chin-Laung Lei;Pei-Ling Yu;Pan-Lung Tsai;Ming-Hwa Chan

  • A crowdsourceable QoE evaluation framework for multimedia content

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Chen-Chi Wu;Yu-Chun Chang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Measuring the latency of cloud gaming systems

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Yu-Chun Chang;Po-Han Tseng;Chun-Ying Huang

  • Modalities for Model Checking: Branching Time Strikes Back.

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Modalities for model checking (extended abstract): branching time strikes back

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin-Laung Lei

  • How sensitive are online gamers to network quality

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Polly Huang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Quadrant of euphoria: a crowdsourcing platform for QoE assessment

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Chi-Jui Chang;Chen-Chi Wu;Yu-Chun Chang

  • Game traffic analysis: an MMORPG perspective

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Polly Huang;Chun-Ying Huang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Are all games equally cloud-gaming-friendly?: an electromyographic approach

    Yeng-Ting Lee;Kuan-Ta Chen;Han-I Su;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Identifying MMORPG bots: a traffic analysis approach

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Jhih-Wei Jiang;Polly Huang;Hao-Hua Chu

  • Efficient Model Checking in Fragments of the Propositional Mu-Calculus (Extended Abstract)

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Effect of Network Quality on Player Departure Behavior in Online Games

    Kuan-Ta Chen;P. Huang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • High quantum efficiency, long wavelength InP/InGaAs microcavity photodiode

    A.G. Dentai;R. Kuchibhotla;J.C. Campbell;C. Tsai

  • Robust authentication and key agreement scheme preserving the privacy of secret key

    Ren-Chiun Wang;Wen-Shenq Juang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Crowdsourcing Multimedia QoE Evaluation: A Trusted Framework

    Chen-Chi Wu;Kuan-Ta Chen;Yu-Chun Chang;Chin-Laung Lei

  • How to detect a compromised SDN switch

    Po-Wen Chi;Chien-Ting Kuo;Jing-Wei Guo;Chin-Laung Lei

  • Identifying MMORPG Bots: A Traffic Analysis Approach (Extended)

    Kuan-Ta Chen;Jhih-Wei Jiang;Polly Huang;Hao-Hua Chu

Frequent Co-Authors

Kuan-Ta Chen
Kuan-Ta Chen Academia Sinica
Polly Huang
Polly Huang National Taiwan University
E. Allen Emerson
E. Allen Emerson The University of Texas at Austin
Hao-Hua Chu
Hao-Hua Chu National Taiwan University
Yennun Huang
Yennun Huang Research Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica
Victor Chang
Victor Chang Aston University
Ming-Yang Kao
Ming-Yang Kao Northwestern University
A.G. Dentai
A.G. Dentai Infinera (United States)
Joe C. Campbell
Joe C. Campbell University of Virginia
Sy-Yen Kuo
Sy-Yen Kuo National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many online learning options and career trajectories. Students who want flexibility or need to balance work commitments often choose online associate degree programs. These programs can be a great way to start your education, build foundational skills, and qualify for entry-level positions in technology.

For those aiming higher, pursuing one of the most useful masters degrees can significantly boost your employment prospects. In-demand master’s programs—especially in data science, artificial intelligence, and software engineering—open opportunities for rapid career advancement and higher earning potential.

Affordability and accessibility are key concerns for many students. Discovering the most affordable online colleges ensures you can pursue your studies without overwhelming financial stress. If your academic record isn’t perfect, don’t worry—there are still opportunities at the best colleges for low gpa, many of which offer quality online computer science degrees.

Whether you’re starting with an associate program, aiming for a master’s, or looking for flexible, cost-effective options, there’s a pathway in computer science to fit your needs and ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Chin-Laung Lei

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles