World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
31106
World Ranking
4424
National Ranking
2068

E. Allen Emerson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Allen Emerson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

E. Allen Emerson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Allen Emerson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - A. M. Turing Award Together with Edmund Clarke and Joseph Sifakis, for their role in developing Model-Checking into a highly effective verification technology that is widely adopted in the hardware and software industries.
  • 1998 - ACM Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award

Overview

E. Allen Emerson is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their primary area of research lies within Computer Science, with a focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their work covers several main topics related to computing, including:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Security and Verification in Computing

The academic output of E. Allen Emerson includes publications predominantly in the areas mentioned above, revealing a consistent concentration on formal methods and verification technologies.

Emerson has received significant recognition from the professional community, including two notable awards. In 2007, they were honored with the A. M. Turing Award for their collaborative role in developing Model-Checking as a verification technology widely adopted in hardware and software industries. Earlier, in 1998, they received the ACM Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award.

Their research demonstrates a clear contribution to the intersection of theoretical computer science and practical verification solutions used in computing security and software reliability.

Best Publications

  • DESIGN AND SYNTHESIS OF SYNCHRONIZATION SKELETONS USING BRANCHING TIME TEMPORAL LOGIC

    Edmund M. Clarke;E. Allen Emerson

  • Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications

    E. M. Clarke;E. A. Emerson;A. P. Sistla

  • Temporal and modal logic

    E. Allen Emerson

  • “Sometimes” and “not never” revisited: on branching versus linear time temporal logic

    E. Allen Emerson;Joseph Y. Halpern

  • Using branching time temporal logic to synthesize synchronization skeletons

    E.Allen Emerson;Edmund M. Clarke

  • EFFICIENT MODEL CHECKING IN FRAGMENTS OF THE PROPOSITIONAL MU-CALCULUS.

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin Laung Lei

  • Symmetry and model checking

    E. Allen Emerson;A. Prasad Sistla

  • Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching time

    E. A. Emerson;Joseph Y. Halpern

  • Modalities for model checking: branching time logic strikes back

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin-Laung Lei

  • The complexity of tree automata and logics of programs

    Unknown

  • Characterizing Correctness Properties of Parallel Programs Using Fixpoints

    E. Allen Emerson;Edmund M. Clarke

  • On Model-Checking for Fragments of µ-Calculus

    E. Allen Emerson;Charanjit S. Jutla;A. Prasad Sistla

  • Model checking: algorithmic verification and debugging

    Edmund M. Clarke;E. Allen Emerson;Joseph Sifakis

  • An automata theoretic decision procedure for the propositional mu-calculus

    Robert S. Streett;E. Allen Emerson

  • Tree Automata, Mu-Calculus and Determinacy (Extended Abstract)

    E. Allen Emerson;Charanjit S. Jutla

  • Reasoning about rings

    E. Allen Emerson;Kedar S. Namjoshi

  • Reducing Model Checking of the Many to the Few

    E. Allen Emerson;Vineet Kahlon

  • Quantitative Temporal Reasoning

    E. Allen Emerson;Aloysius K. Mok;A. Prasad Sistla;Jai Srinivasan

  • Symmetry Reductions inModel Checking

    Edmund M. Clarke;E. Allen Emerson;Somesh Jha;A. Prasad Sistla

  • Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching time

    E. Allen Emerson;Joseph Y. Halpern

  • Efficient Model Checking in Fragments of the Propositional Mu-Calculus (Extended Abstract)

    E. Allen Emerson;Chin-Laung Lei

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Prasad Sistla
A. Prasad Sistla University of Illinois at Chicago
Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Charanjit S. Jutla
Charanjit S. Jutla IBM (United States)
Chin-Laung Lei
Chin-Laung Lei National Taiwan University
Aloysius K. Mok
Aloysius K. Mok The University of Texas at Austin
David L. Dill
David L. Dill Stanford University
Joseph Y. Halpern
Joseph Y. Halpern Cornell University
Anish Arora
Anish Arora The Ohio State University
Jacob A. Abraham
Jacob A. Abraham The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary degrees can significantly expand your career options in the technology sector. Online programs make it easier and more affordable than ever to gain new expertise while maintaining your current commitments.

If you’re interested in broadening your scientific knowledge, consider looking into the cheapest online physics degree options available. These programs offer a solid foundation for tech roles that require critical thinking and quantitative skills.

For students who want to enter data-driven industries, affordable data science programs in the USA provide a gateway into fields like analytics and machine learning. Completing a online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can open doors to careers in electronics, automation, and telecommunications.

Additionally, earning easy certifications to get can quickly boost your employability and potentially lead to higher-paying jobs, especially when combined with your computer science background.

Best Scientists Citing E. Allen Emerson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles