World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
6196
World Ranking
7694
National Ranking
2116

Carey M. Rappaport publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey M. Rappaport sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 345 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Carey M. Rappaport D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey M. Rappaport sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to modeling electromagnetic wave propagation in complex media.

Overview

Carey M. Rappaport is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the field of engineering. Their work covers several subfields including electrical and electronic engineering, aerospace engineering, biomedical engineering, cognitive neuroscience, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their research topics focus on areas such as terahertz technology and applications, advanced SAR imaging techniques, microwave imaging and scattering analysis, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, geophysical methods and applications, radar systems and signal processing, and microwave and dielectric measurement techniques.

Recent publications by Carey M. Rappaport include:

  • Single-Frequency Fast Dielectric Characterization of Concealed Body-Worn Explosive Threats (2020), IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
  • Automatic Threat Prediction of Body-Worn Objects for Security Screening Purposes (2022), IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
  • Nominal Body Contour Reconstruction for Millimeter-Wave Characterization of Suicide Bomber Explosives (2021), IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
  • Pixel-Wise Localization of Concealed Objects on Millimeter-Wave Radar Images Using Deep Learning (2024), IEEE Transactions on Radar Systems
  • Fast, Fully-Automatic Characterization of Metallic and Water-Based Threat Objects for Millimeter-Wave Personnel Screening Systems (2023), IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation

Frequent co-authors in their work include Mahshid Asri, Mohammad M. Tajdini, Elizabeth Wig, Eric D. Robinsòn, and Sarah Hadipour.

Carey M. Rappaport has published multiple papers in various prominent venues, with a concentration in:

  • IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
  • IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation
  • 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems & Technology (PAST)
  • 2022 16th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist's research contributions also extend to modeling electromagnetic wave propagation in complex media, which was recognized by being named an IEEE Fellow in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Time reversal with the FDTD method for microwave breast cancer detection

    P. Kosmas;C.M. Rappaport

  • A shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic tomography using adjoint fields and level sets

    Oliver Dorn;Eric L Miller;Carey M Rappaport

  • Wide-aperture catheter-based microwave cardiac ablation antenna

    Carey M. Rappaport;Paul Wang;Zeji Gu

  • Perfectly matched absorbing boundary conditions based on anisotropic lossy mapping of space

    C.M. Rappaport

  • A general method for FDTD modeling of wave propagation in arbitrary frequency-dispersive media

    W.H. Weedon;C.M. Rappaport

  • Balloon angioplasty device

    Carey M. Rappaport

  • FDTD-based time reversal for microwave breast cancer Detection-localization in three dimensions

    P. Kosmas;C.M. Rappaport

  • A matched-filter FDTD-based time reversal approach for microwave breast cancer detection

    P. Kosmas;C.M. Rappaport

  • An FPGA implementation of the two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm

    Wang Chen;Panos Kosmas;Miriam Leeser;Carey Rappaport

  • Statistical method to detect subsurface objects using array ground-penetrating radar data

    Xiaoyin Xu;E.L. Miller;C.M. Rappaport;G.D. Sower

  • SAR Imaging of Suicide Bombers Wearing Concealed Explosive Threats

    Jose Angel Martinez-Lorenzo;Fernando Quivira;Carey M. Rappaport

  • Subsurface Sensing of Buried Objects Under a Randomly Rough Surface Using Scattered Electromagnetic Field Data

    R. Firoozabadi;E.L. Miller;C.M. Rappaport;A.W. Morgenthaler

  • Three-dimensional subsurface analysis of electromagnetic scattering from penetrable/PEC objects buried under rough surfaces: use of the steepest descent fast multipole method

    M. El-Shenawee;C. Rappaport;E.L. Miller;M.B. Silevitch

  • FDTD simulation of TE and TM plane waves at nonzero incidence in arbitrary Layered media

    S.C. Winton;P. Kosmas;C.M. Rappaport

  • Wave Scattering by Dielectric and Lossy Materials Using the Modified Equivalent Current Approximation (MECA)

    J G Meana;J Á Martinez-Lorenzo;F Las-Heras;C Rappaport

  • Minimum entropy regularization in frequency-wavenumber migration to localize subsurface objects

    Xiaoyin Xu;E.L. Miller;C.M. Rappaport

  • Modeling with the FDTD method for microwave breast cancer detection

    P. Kosmas;C.M. Rappaport;E. Bishop

  • A new shape-based method for object localization and characterization from scattered field data

    E.L. Miller;M. Kilmer;C. Rappaport

  • Physical Limitations on Detecting Tunnels Using Underground-Focusing Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar

    J A Martinez-Lorenzo;C M Rappaport;F Quivira

  • Improving Security Screening: A Comparison of Multistatic Radar Configurations for Human Body Imaging

    Borja Gonzalez-Valdes;Yuri Alvarez;Spiros Mantzavinos;Carey M. Rappaport

  • Interpreting and improving the PML absorbing boundary condition using anisotropic lossy mapping of space

    C.M. Rappaport

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric L. Miller
Eric L. Miller Tufts University
Fernando Las-Heras
Fernando Las-Heras University of Oviedo
Akram N. Alshawabkeh
Akram N. Alshawabkeh Northeastern University
Daniel B. Kopans
Daniel B. Kopans Harvard University
David A. Castanon
David A. Castanon Boston University
Paul J. Wang
Paul J. Wang Stanford University
Milica Stojanovic
Milica Stojanovic Northeastern University
Oscar Lopez
Oscar Lopez Universidade de Vigo
Michael B. Steer
Michael B. Steer North Carolina State University
Atef Z. Elsherbeni
Atef Z. Elsherbeni Colorado School of Mines

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology programs open diverse pathways, often intersecting with various industries. If you’re considering career mobility or specialization, pursuing online degrees can offer flexibility and affordability. For example, many engineering graduates explore business leadership by enrolling in the cheapest online mba aacsb programs to gain essential management skills.

The hospitality sector is also growing, with technology reshaping how hotels and restaurants operate. An online hotel and restaurant management degree online can complement a technical background, opening doors to management roles in hospitality technology or operations.

For those interested in law and compliance within engineering fields, completing aba-approved online paralegal programs can provide vital knowledge for roles related to patents, contracts, or regulatory affairs.

Similarly, engineers aiming to lead organizational talent and culture can benefit from a cheap online hr masters degree. This pathway equips graduates to manage workforce strategy and development in tech-driven companies.

Best Scientists Citing Carey M. Rappaport

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles