World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
11791
World Ranking
7299
National Ranking
3151

Bruce Luber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Luber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bruce Luber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Luber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce Luber is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions in cognitive neuroscience, neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry and mental health, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Bruce Luber has published extensively in multiple scientific venues. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Nature Protocols
  • Brain Sciences
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Luber encompass a range of themes in brain stimulation and neuroimaging. Selected works include:

  • "Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement," 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • "Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: Recommendations from an IFCN committee," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "A generalized workflow for conducting electric field-optimized, fMRI-guided, transcranial magnetic stimulation," 2020, Nature Protocols
  • "Using diffusion tensor imaging to effectively target TMS to deep brain structures," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Device-Based Modulation of Neurocircuits as a Therapeutic for Psychiatric Disorders," 2020, The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Bruce Luber include:

  • Sarah H. Lisanby
  • Zhi-De Deng
  • Lysianne Beynel
  • Simon W. Davis
  • Angel V. Peterchev

Best Publications

  • Handbook of psychophysiology

    John T. Cacioppo;Louis G. Tassinary;Gary G. Berntson

  • Parietal cortex and representation of the mental Self

    Hans C. Lou;Hans C. Lou;Hans C. Lou;Bruce Luber;Michael Crupain;Julian P. Keenan

  • Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials

    Sarah H Lisanby;David Gutman;Bruce Luber;Charles Schroeder

  • Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

    Bruce Luber;Sarah H. Lisanby

  • Safety and feasibility of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) in major depression: randomized within-subject comparison with electroconvulsive therapy.

    Sarah H Lisanby;Bruce Luber;Thomas E Schlaepfer;Harold A Sackeim

  • EEG manifestations during ECT : effects of electrode placement and stimulus intensity

    Mitchell S. Nobler;Harold A. Sackeim;Maria Solomou;Bruce Luber

  • The Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Quantitative Electroencephalograms: Relationship to Clinical Outcome

    Harold A. Sackeim;Bruce Luber;Gary P. Katzman;James R. Moeller

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement

    Unknown

  • The Dynamic Duo: Combining noninvasive brain stimulation with cognitive interventions.

    Aakash V. Sathappan;Bruce M. Luber;Sarah H. Lisanby

  • Facilitation of performance in a working memory task with rTMS stimulation of the precuneus: frequency- and time-dependent effects.

    B. Luber;L.H. Kinnunen;B.C. Rakitin;R. Ellsasser

  • Direct injection of noise to the visual cortex decreases accuracy but increases decision confidence

    Dobromir A. Rahnev;Brian Maniscalco;Bruce Luber;Hakwan Lau;Hakwan Lau

  • Seizure expression during electroconvulsive therapy: relationships with clinical outcome and cognitive side effects.

    Tarique D Perera;Bruce Luber;Mitchell S Nobler;Joan Prudic

  • Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input–output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Angel V. Peterchev;Stefan M. Goetz;Stefan M. Goetz;Gregory G. Westin;Bruce Luber

  • Quantitative EEG During Seizures Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy: Relations to Treatment Modality and Clinical Features. I. Global Analyses

    Mitchell S. Nobler;Bruce Luber;James R. Moeller;Gary P. Katzman

  • Deliberate seizure induction with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in nonhuman primates.

    Sarah H. Lisanby;Bruce Luber;Harold A. Sackeim;A. D. Finck

  • Different brain networks mediate task performance in normal aging and AD Defining compensation

    Y. Stern;J.R. Moeller;K.E. Anderson;B. Luber

  • Amphetamine disrupts P50 suppression in normal subjects.

    Gregory A Light;Dolores Malaspina;Mark A Geyer;Bruce M Luber

  • Electrophysiological correlates of the adverse cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy.

    Harold A. Sackeim;Bruce Luber;James R. Moeller;Joan Prudic

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation: applications in basic neuroscience and neuropsychopharmacology

    Sarah H. Lisanby;Bruce Luber;Tarique Perera;Harold A. Sackeim

  • Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

    Lysianne Beynel;Lawrence G. Appelbaum;Bruce Luber;Courtney A. Crowell

  • Remediation of Sleep-Deprivation–Induced Working Memory Impairment with fMRI-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    B. Luber;A. D. Stanford;P. Bulow;T. Nguyen

  • Using neuroimaging to individualize TMS treatment for depression: Toward a new paradigm for imaging-guided intervention.

    Bruce M. Luber;Simon Davis;Elisabeth Bernhardt;Andrada Neacsiu

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah H. Lisanby
Sarah H. Lisanby Arizona State University
Harold A. Sackeim
Harold A. Sackeim Columbia University
Devangere P. Devanand
Devangere P. Devanand Columbia University
Shawn M. McClintock
Shawn M. McClintock The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Steven P. Roose
Steven P. Roose Columbia University
Yaakov Stern
Yaakov Stern Columbia University
Dolores Malaspina
Dolores Malaspina Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Angel V. Peterchev
Angel V. Peterchev Duke University
Julian Paul Keenan
Julian Paul Keenan Montclair State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Neuroscience continues to grow, many students explore related degree options and lucrative career pathways. For those keen to maximize their earning potential, it's valuable to review some of the highest paying majors. Fields overlapping with Neuroscience—such as Biotechnology, Biomedical Engineering, and Computer Science—often lead to high-demand roles in healthcare, tech, and research sectors.

Flexible online programs make it easier for adults and working professionals to upskill or transition careers. Many institutions now offer convenient online classes for adults in psychology, biology, and related fields. For those seeking affordability and financial support, exploring online schools that accept fafsa can make higher education more accessible and budget-friendly.

Additionally, students can gain practical skills through online certification programs in areas like data analysis, clinical research, and neurotechnology. These certifications can complement a traditional degree, enhance employability, and open doors to a variety of dynamic, well-paying careers in the Neuroscience sphere.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Luber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles