World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 50 4496 4135 399 379 183 7642

Bryan Charleston publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bryan Charleston between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bryan Charleston published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 5 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bryan Charleston: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 0
1997 0
1998 5
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 9
2008 6
2009 6
2010 7
2011 10
2012 9
2013 11
2014 4
2015 6
2016 16
2017 8
2018 11
2019 8
2020 11
2021 19
2022 5
2023 4
2024 2
2025 3
Total 188
Download as CSV

Bryan Charleston publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Charleston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 183 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276 183
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Bryan Charleston D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Charleston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129 50
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Bryan Charleston is affiliated with The Pirbright Institute in the United Kingdom, contributing significantly to research within Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Immunology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research primarily focuses on several main topics such as Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology, Vector-Borne Animal Diseases, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Viral Infections and Immunology Research, Influenza Virus Research Studies, Viral Infections and Vectors, and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research.

Key recent publications by Bryan Charleston include the following:

  • A COVID-19 vaccine candidate using SpyCatcher multimerization of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain induces potent neutralising antibody responses (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Evaluation of the immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination with the replication-deficient viral vectored COVID-19 vaccine candidate ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (2020, npj Vaccines)
  • Neutralizing antibody activity against 21 SARS-CoV-2 variants in older adults vaccinated with BNT162b2 (2022, Nature Microbiology)
  • Endemic persistence of a highly contagious pathogen: Foot-and-mouth disease in its wildlife host (2021, Science)
  • A COVID-19 vaccine candidate using SpyCatcher multimerization of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain induces potent neutralising antibody responses (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

Bryan Charleston frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Veterinary Record
  • PLoS Pathogens
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • npj Vaccines

Common co-authors in their research include:

  • Elma Tchilian
  • Nazia Thakur
  • Joseph Newman
  • Dalan Bailey
  • Eva Pérez-Martín

Best Publications

  • Options for control of foot-and-mouth disease: knowledge, capability and policy

    David J. Paton;Keith J. Sumption;Bryan Charleston

  • A COVID-19 vaccine candidate using SpyCatcher multimerization of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain induces potent neutralising antibody responses.

    T K Tan;P Rijal;P Rijal;R Rahikainen;A H Keeble

  • Establishment of persistent infection with non-cytopathic bovine viral diarrhoea virus in cattle is associated with a failure to induce type I interferon.

    B. Charleston;M. D. Fray;S. Baigent;B. V. Carr

  • Relationship Between Clinical Signs and Transmission of an Infectious Disease and the Implications for Control

    Bryan Charleston;Bartlomies M. Bankowski;Simon Gubbins;Margo E. Chase-Topping

  • Rational Engineering of Recombinant Picornavirus Capsids to Produce Safe, Protective Vaccine Antigen

    Claudine Porta;Abhay Kotecha;Alison Burman;Terry Jackson

  • Bovine γδ T Cells Are a Major Regulatory T Cell Subset

    Efrain Guzman;Jayne Hope;Geraldine Taylor;Adrian L. Smith

  • Global FMD control : is it an option?

    Paul Kitching;Jef Hammond;Martyn Jeggo;Bryan Charleston

  • Evaluation of the immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination with the replication-deficient viral vectored COVID-19 vaccine candidate ChAdOx1 nCoV-19

    Simon P Graham;Rebecca K McLean;Alexandra J Spencer;Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer

  • Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus: Prevention of Persistent Fetal Infection by a Combination of Two Mutations Affecting Erns RNase and Npro Protease

    Gregor Meyers;Andreas Ege;Christiane Fetzer;Martina von Freyburg

  • Validation of an Mx/CAT reporter gene assay for the quantification of bovine type-I interferon

    M.D. Fray;G.E Mann;B. Charleston

  • The Npro product of classical swine fever virus and bovine viral diarrhea virus uses a conserved mechanism to target interferon regulatory factor-3.

    Julian Seago;Louise Hilton;Elizabeth Reid;Virginie Doceul

  • Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Can Induce a Specific and Rapid CD4+ T-Cell-Independent Neutralizing and Isotype Class-Switched Antibody Response in Naïve Cattle

    Nicholas Juleff;Miriam Windsor;Eric A. Lefevre;Simon Gubbins

  • Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells

    E J Glew;B V Carr;L.S Brackenbury;Jayne Hope

  • Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vaccine Provides Multispecies Protection against Rift Valley Fever

    G M Warimwe;J Gesharisha;B V Carr;S Otieno

  • Foot-and-mouth disease virus persists in the light zone of germinal centres.

    Nicholas Juleff;Miriam Windsor;Elizabeth Reid;Julian Seago

  • Structure-based energetics of protein interfaces guides foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine design.

    A Kotecha;J Seago;K Scott;A Burman

  • Neutralizing antibody activity against 21 SARS-CoV-2 variants in older adults vaccinated with BNT162b2

    Unknown

  • An MHC-restricted CD8+ T-cell response is induced in cattle by foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection and also following vaccination with inactivated FMDV

    Efrain Guzman;Geraldine Taylor;Bryan Charleston;Michael A. Skinner

  • Characterization of the porcine neonatal Fc receptor—potential use for trans-epithelial protein delivery

    Catrina M. A. Stirling;Bryan Charleston;Haru Takamatsu;Steven Claypool

  • Efficient production of foot-and-mouth disease virus empty capsids in insect cells following down regulation of 3C protease activity

    Claudine Porta;Xiaodong Xu;Silvia Loureiro;Saravanan Paramasivam

  • An interferon-induced Mx protein: cDNA sequence and high-level expression in the endometrium of pregnant sheep.

    Bryan Charleston;Harriet J. Stewart

  • A COVID-19 vaccine candidate using SpyCatcher multimerization of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain induces potent neutralising antibody responses

    Tiong Kit Tan;Pramila Rijal;Pramila Rijal;Rolle Rahikainen;Anthony H. Keeble

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Gubbins
Simon Gubbins The Pirbright Institute
Jayne Hope
Jayne Hope University of Edinburgh
Sarah C. Gilbert
Sarah C. Gilbert University of Oxford
David I. Stuart
David I. Stuart University of Oxford
Elizabeth E. Fry
Elizabeth E. Fry University of Oxford
Raymond J. Owens
Raymond J. Owens University of Oxford
Ian M. Jones
Ian M. Jones University of Reading
Luis L. Rodriguez
Luis L. Rodriguez United States Department of Agriculture
Mark E. J. Woolhouse
Mark E. J. Woolhouse University of Edinburgh
David J. Paton
David J. Paton The Pirbright Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors not only to research and clinical roles but also to interdisciplinary career pathways that integrate healthcare technology and data management. One promising area is medical coding, where professionals become experts in translating healthcare services into standardized codes. Aspiring individuals can explore the certified professional coder (CPC) credential, a valuable certification for entering this field.

Another related pathway is health information management, which plays a critical role in organizing and securing patient data. Those interested can learn about the field through detailed overviews like the health information management job description and salary, helping to understand the expectations and benefits of this career.

For students aiming to pursue formal education in this domain, selecting the right program is essential. Several institutions offer the best CAHIIM accredited HIM programs online, ensuring quality and industry recognition. Additionally, if accelerating entry into the workforce is a priority, exploring the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs is beneficial.

Overall, combining microbiology expertise with these allied health and information management skills can significantly enhance job prospects and career growth in the evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan Charleston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles