World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
3902
World Ranking
7147
National Ranking
3467

Monika Stodolska publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monika Stodolska sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 105 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Monika Stodolska D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monika Stodolska sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Monika Stodolska is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research focuses on social sciences and psychology, with particular attention to subfields such as sociology and political science, social psychology, general health professions, cultural studies, and demography.

The researcher's work spans several main topics including recreation, leisure, wilderness management, sport and mega-event impacts, psychosocial factors impacting youth, adventure sports and sensation seeking, Asian culture and media studies, the nonprofit sector and volunteering, and migration, ethnicity, and economy.

Stodolska has a number of recent papers published in notable academic journals. These include:

  • #QuarantineChallenge2k20: Leisure in the Time of the Pandemic (2020), Leisure Sciences
  • Leisure and China in the global context: Introduction to the special issue (2021), Journal of Leisure Research

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Guangzhou Chen, Jon Welty Peachey, KangJae Jerry Lee, Sunhwan Hwang, and Kimberly J. Shinew.

Their research has been published predominantly in venues such as Leisure Sciences and the Journal of Leisure Research, with multiple publications also appearing in Current Psychology, Journal of Global Sport Management, and Managing Sport and Leisure.

  • Leisure Sciences (11 publications)
  • Journal of Leisure Research (5 publications)
  • Current Psychology (1 publication)
  • Journal of Global Sport Management (1 publication)
  • Managing Sport and Leisure (1 publication)

Within the social sciences, Stodolska has contributed extensively to the fields of sociology and political science as well as social psychology, demonstrating interdisciplinary engagement with topics related to leisure, culture, and psychosocial phenomena.

Best Publications

  • The Role of Recreational Sport in the Adaptation of First Generation Immigrants in the United States

    Monika Stodolska;Konstantinos Alexandris

  • Assimilation and Leisure Constraints: Dynamics of Constraints on Leisure in Immigrant Populations

    Unknown

  • The effects of discrimination and constraints negotiation on leisure behavior of American Muslims in the post-September 11 America.

    Jennifer S. Livengood;Monika Stodolska

  • Impacts of Immigration on Ethnic Identity and Leisure Behavior of Adolescent Immigrants from Korea, Mexico and Poland

    Monika Stodolska;Jouyeon Yi

  • The influence of religion on the leisure behavior of immigrant Muslims in the United States.

    Monika Stodolska;Jennifer S. Livengood

  • Changes in Leisure Participation Patterns After Immigration

    Monika Stodolska

  • Perceptions of Urban Parks as Havens and Contested Terrains by Mexican-Americans in Chicago Neighborhoods

    Monika Stodolska;Kimberly J. Shinew;Juan Carlos Acevedo;Dina Izenstark

  • Race and Ethnicity in Leisure Behavior: Where Have We Been and Where Do We Need to Go?

    Kimberly J. Shinew;Monika Stodolska;Myron Floyd;Dan Hibbler

  • Transnationalism, leisure, and Chinese graduate students in the United States.

    Monica Z. Li;Monika Stodolska

  • Leisure time, leisure activities, and happiness in China: Evidence from a national survey

    Xiang Wei;Songshan Sam Huang;Monika Stodolska;Yihua Yu

  • Discrimination in Leisure and Work Experienced by a White Ethnic Minority Group

    Monika Stodolska;Edgar L. Jackson

  • TRANSNATIONALISM AND LEISURE: MEXICAN TEMPORARY MIGRANTS IN THE U.S.

    Monika Stodolska;Carla Almeida Santos

  • Constraints on Recreation Among People of Color: Toward a New Constraints Model

    Monika Stodolska;Kimberly J. Shinew;Leslie N. Camarillo

  • “I Was Born in the Hood”: Fear of Crime, Outdoor Recreation and Physical Activity Among Mexican-American Urban Adolescents

    Monika Stodolska;Kimberly J. Shinew;Juan Carlos Acevedo;Caterina G. Roman

  • Race, Ethnicity, and Leisure: Perspectives on Research, Theory, and Practice

    Monika Stodolska;Kimberly J Shinew;Myron Floyd;Gordon J. Walker

  • Perceived discrimination in leisure settings in Latino urban communities

    Iryna Sharaievska;Monika Stodolska;Kimberly J. Shinew;Jungeun Kim

  • Constraints experienced by elite athletes with disabilities in Kenya, with implications for the development of a new hierarchical model of constraints at the societal level.

    Janna L. Crawford;Monika Stodolska

  • The influence of perceived constraints on the attitudes toward recreational sport participation

    Konstantinos Alexandris;Monika Stodolska

  • Determinants of leisure time physical activity participation among Latina women.

    Maya A. Skowron;Monika Stodolska;Kimberly J. Shinew

  • Looking beyond the Invisible: Can Research on Leisure of Ethnic and Racial Minorities Contribute to Leisure Theory?

    Monika Stodolska

  • Ethnicity and leisure: Historical development, current status, and future directions

    Monika Stodolska;Gordon J. Walker

  • The role of natural environments in developing a sense of belonging: A comparative study of immigrants in the U.S., Poland, the Netherlands and Germany

    Karin Peters;Monika Stodolska;Anna Horolets

  • Leisure Matters:The State and Future of Leisure Studies

    Gordon J. Walker;David Scott;Monika Stodolska

Frequent Co-Authors

Myron F. Floyd
Myron F. Floyd North Carolina State University
Allison M. Ryan
Allison M. Ryan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William Stewart
William Stewart University of Glasgow
David Scott
David Scott Ascension Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities is now more accessible thanks to a range of flexible online degree options. Prospective students can choose from programs that suit different academic and professional goals, such as online psyd programs for those seeking advanced roles in psychology and clinical practice.

For individuals interested in family therapy, online masters mft programs offer specialized training to address diverse family and relationship issues. These options allow students to start their counseling careers in less time.

Affordability is an important factor, and the cheapest online master's in psychology programs can provide high-quality education without breaking the bank. These programs are ideal for cost-conscious learners.

Those aiming for leadership roles in education or administration can accelerate their plans by enrolling in edd online programs, which offer fast-track pathways to a Doctor of Education degree.

With a growing number of online options, students can now choose degrees that align with their career ambitions, learning styles, and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Monika Stodolska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles