World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 45 6963 6409 3003 2704 120 6987

Benjamin R. Arenkiel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin R. Arenkiel between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin R. Arenkiel published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2024. 38 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2024. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 16 publications
2003 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin R. Arenkiel: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 4
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 1
2011 4
2012 6
2013 5
2014 5
2015 6
2016 6
2017 7
2018 9
2019 15
2020 7
2021 12
2022 9
2023 14
2024 22
2025 16
Total 156
Download as CSV

Benjamin R. Arenkiel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin R. Arenkiel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 120 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 120
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Benjamin R. Arenkiel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin R. Arenkiel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 45
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin R. Arenkiel is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions in neuroscience marked by 114 publications and 43 in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their work is deeply involved in several subfields, including cellular and molecular neuroscience, endocrine and autonomic systems, molecular biology, sensory systems, and neurology. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the range of main topics covered in their studies, such as olfactory and sensory function, regulation of appetite and obesity, neurobiology and insect physiology, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, as well as circadian rhythm and melatonin research.

Benjamin R. Arenkiel's recent papers include:

  • Profound and redundant functions of arcuate neurons in obesity development, 2020, Nature Metabolism
  • Induction of astrocytic Slc22a3 regulates sensory processing through histone serotonylation, 2023, Science
  • Paraventricular hypothalamus mediates diurnal rhythm of metabolism, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Ventral striatal islands of Calleja neurons control grooming in mice, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Olfactory bulb astrocytes mediate sensory circuit processing through Sox9 in the mouse brain, 2021, Nature Communications

Frequent publication venues where this scientist's work has appeared include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Nature Metabolism, Cell Reports, and Frontiers in Neural Circuits. The highest number of publications has been in bioRxiv with 13 contributions, followed by Nature Communications with 5.

Collaboration is a key aspect of their research portfolio, with frequent co-authors including Joshua Ortiz-Guzman, Qingchun Tong, Yong Xu, Benjamin D. W. Belfort, and Snigdha Srivastava.

Best Publications

  • In Vivo Light-Induced Activation of Neural Circuitry in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2

    Benjamin R. Arenkiel;Joao Peca;Joao Peca;Ian G. Davison;Ian G. Davison;Catia Feliciano

  • Identification of diverse astrocyte populations and their malignant analogs.

    Chia-Ching John Lin;Kwanha Yu;Asante Hatcher;Teng-Wei Huang

  • Imaging Neural Activity Using Thy1-GCaMP Transgenic mice

    Qian Chen;Joseph Cichon;Wenting Wang;Li Qiu

  • The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth

    Anne M. Boulet;Anne M. Moon;Benjamin R. Arenkiel;Mario R. Capecchi

  • Single-Cell RNA-Seq of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Reveals Cellular Heterogeneity and Activity-Dependent Molecular Census of Adult-Born Neurons.

    Burak Tepe;Matthew C. Hill;Brandon T. Pekarek;Patrick J. Hunt

  • Dopamine Regulates Aversive Contextual Learning and Associated In Vivo Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampus.

    John I. Broussard;Kechun Yang;Amber T. Levine;Theodoros Tsetsenis

  • New Modules Are Added to Vibrissal Premotor Circuitry with the Emergence of Exploratory Whisking

    Jun Takatoh;Anders Nelson;Xiang Zhou;M. McLean Bolton

  • A cholinergic basal forebrain feeding circuit modulates appetite suppression

    Alexander M. Herman;Joshua Ortiz-Guzman;Mikhail Kochukov;Isabella Herman

  • Loss and Gain of MeCP2 Cause Similar Hippocampal Circuit Dysfunction that Is Rescued by Deep Brain Stimulation in a Rett Syndrome Mouse Model.

    Hui Lu;Hui Lu;Ryan T. Ash;Lingjie He;Lingjie He;Sara E. Kee

  • Synaptic Modifications in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Susceptibility and Resilience to Stress

    Minghui Wang;Zinaida Perova;Benjamin R. Arenkiel;Bo Li

  • Cell type-specific and time-dependent light exposure contribute to silencing in neurons expressing Channelrhodopsin-2

    Alexander M Herman;Longwen Huang;Dona K Murphey;Isabella Garcia

  • Mutations in ANKLE2, a ZIKA Virus Target, Disrupt an Asymmetric Cell Division Pathway in Drosophila Neuroblasts to Cause Microcephaly.

    Nichole Link;Nichole Link;Hyunglok Chung;Hyunglok Chung;Angad Jolly;Marjorie Withers

  • Glutamate mediates the function of melanocortin receptor 4 on Sim1 neurons in body weight regulation.

    Yuanzhong Xu;Zhaofei Wu;Hao Sun;Yaming Zhu

  • GABAergic projections from lateral hypothalamus to paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus promote feeding.

    Z. Wu;E. R. Kim;H. Sun;Y. Xu

  • Activity-Induced Remodeling of Olfactory Bulb Microcircuits Revealed by Monosynaptic Tracing

    Benjamin R. Arenkiel;Benjamin R. Arenkiel;Hiroshi Hasegawa;Jason J. Yi;Rylan S. Larsen

  • Genetic control of neuronal activity in mice conditionally expressing TRPV1

    Benjamin R Arenkiel;Marguerita E Klein;Ian G Davison;Lawrence C Katz

  • Profound and redundant functions of arcuate neurons in obesity development.

    Canjun Zhu;Canjun Zhu;Zhiying Jiang;Yuanzhong Xu;Zhao-Lin Cai;Zhao-Lin Cai

  • Identification of a neurocircuit underlying regulation of feeding by stress-related emotional responses

    Yuanzhong Xu;Yungang Lu;Ryan M. Cassidy;Leandra R. Mangieri

  • Molecular genetics and imaging technologies for circuit-based neuroanatomy.

    Benjamin R. Arenkiel;Michael D. Ehlers

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Like Induction Elevates β-Amyloid Levels, Which Directly Activates Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Neurons to Exacerbate Stress Responses

    Nicholas J. Justice;Longwen Huang;Longwen Huang;Jin Bin Tian;Allysa Cole

  • Reciprocal connectivity between mitral cells and external plexiform layer interneurons in the mouse olfactory bulb.

    Longwen Huang;Isabella Garcia;Hsin-I Jen;Benjamin R. Arenkiel

Frequent Co-Authors

Qingchun Tong
Qingchun Tong The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Yong Xu
Yong Xu University of South Florida
Michael D. Ehlers
Michael D. Ehlers MPM BioImpact
Mario R. Capecchi
Mario R. Capecchi University of Utah
Hugo J. Bellen
Hugo J. Bellen Baylor College of Medicine
Andreas S. Tolias
Andreas S. Tolias Baylor College of Medicine
Nevan J. Krogan
Nevan J. Krogan University of California, San Francisco
James R. Lupski
James R. Lupski Baylor College of Medicine
Philip L. De Jager
Philip L. De Jager Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors not only to research and academia, but also to diverse allied fields. Many students interested in brain science consider dual specialties or related further studies for broader career opportunities.

For those attracted to supporting individuals in community and clinical settings, affordable online msw programs are a flexible route to earn a degree in social work. These programs are ideal for neuroscience graduates interested in social services or mental health support roles. Learners seeking faster completion can explore accelerated msw programs that streamline the process.

If your passion lies in behavioral analysis, consider programs designed for certification, like bcba accredited programs online. These prepare you for Board Certified Behavior Analyst roles, crucial in autism care, developmental therapy, and applied behavioral research.

A broader look at the mind is also possible through a flexible online psychology degree. This pathway offers insight into cognition, therapy, research, and counseling—skills that perfectly complement neuroscience knowledge for versatile career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin R. Arenkiel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles