World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ben B. B. Booth

Ben B. B. Booth

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
10506
World Ranking
5700
National Ranking
442

Ben B. B. Booth publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ben B. B. Booth sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ben B. B. Booth D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ben B. B. Booth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ben B. B. Booth is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on earth and planetary sciences, with substantial contributions in environmental science as well.

The scientist's work covers several specialized subfields including global and planetary change, oceanography, geophysics, mechanics of materials, and atmospheric science. Their research topics address a range of areas such as climate variability and models, geophysics and gravity measurements, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Historical Simulations With HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Aerosol-Forced AMOC Changes in CMIP6 Historical Simulations, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Comparing Methods to Constrain Future European Climate Projections Using a Consistent Framework, 2020, Journal of Climate
  • A perturbed parameter ensemble of HadGEM3-GC3.05 coupled model projections: part 1: selecting the parameter combinations, 2021, Climate Dynamics
  • How does the CMIP6 ensemble change the picture for European climate projections?, 2021, Environmental Research Letters

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • C. McSweeney
  • Lukas Brunner
  • Andrew Ballinger
  • Erika Coppola
  • Glen Harris

Booth's work has appeared most often in publication venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Earth System Dynamics, Environmental Research Letters, Geoscientific Model Development, and Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Best Publications

  • Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability

    Ben B. B. Booth;Nick J. Dunstone;Paul R. Halloran;Timothy Andrews

  • UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change projections

    J.M. Murphy;D.M.H. Sexton;G.J. Jenkins;B.B.B. Booth

  • Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability

    Peter M. Cox;David Pearson;Ben B. Booth;Pierre Friedlingstein

  • Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO2-induced climate change

    Chris Huntingford;Przemyslaw Zelazowski;David Galbraith;David Galbraith;Lina M. Mercado

  • Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;Glen R. Harris;James M. Murphy

  • A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles

    J.M Murphy;B.B.B Booth;M Collins;G.R Harris

  • High sensitivity of future global warming to land carbon cycle processes

    Ben B B Booth;Chris D Jones;Mat Collins;Mat Collins;Ian J Totterdell

  • Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;B. Bhaskaran;Glen R. Harris

  • Reconciling Past and Future Rainfall Trends over East Africa

    David P. Rowell;Ben Bb B. Booth;Sharon E. Nicholson;Peter Good

  • Historical simulations with HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6

    Martin B. Andrews;Jeff K. Ridley;Richard A. Wood;Timothy Andrews

  • Towards quantifying uncertainty in predictions of Amazon dieback

    Chris Huntingford;Rosie A. Fisher;Lina Mercado;Ben B. B. Booth

  • Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions

    D. J. Frame;B. B. B. Booth;J. A. Kettleborough;D. A. Stainforth

  • Role of volcanic and anthropogenic aerosols in the recent global surface warming slowdown

    Doug M. Smith;Ben B. B. Booth;Nick J. Dunstone;Rosie Eade

  • Aerosol-Forced AMOC Changes in CMIP6 Historical Simulations

    Matthew B. Menary;Jon Robson;Richard Allan;Ben B. B. Booth

  • Selecting Ensemble Members to Provide Regional Climate Change Information

    Carol F. McSweeney;Richard G. Jones;Ben B. B. Booth

  • Anthropogenic aerosol forcing of Atlantic tropical storms

    N. J. Dunstone;D. M. Smith;B. B. B. Booth;L. Hermanson

  • Sensitivity of Twentieth-Century Sahel Rainfall to Sulfate Aerosol and CO2 Forcing

    Duncan Ackerley;Ben B. B. Booth;Sylvia H. E. Knight;Eleanor J. Highwood

  • Broad range of 2050 warming from an observationally constrained large climate model ensemble

    Daniel J Rowlands;Daniel J Rowlands;David J Frame;Duncan Ackerley;Duncan Ackerley;Tolu Aina

  • The Multidecadal Atlantic SST—Sahel Rainfall Teleconnection in CMIP5 Simulations

    Elinor R. Martin;Chris Thorncroft;Ben B. B. Booth

  • Avoiding dangerous climate change

    M. R. Allen;N. Andronova;B. Booth;S. Dessai

  • Reconciling Past and Future Rainfall Trends over East Africa

    B. Booth;D. Rowell;S. E. Nicholson;P. Good

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Betts
Richard Betts University of Exeter
Chris Huntingford
Chris Huntingford Natural Environment Research Council
Matthew Collins
Matthew Collins University of Exeter
Peter M. Cox
Peter M. Cox University of Exeter
Chris D. Jones
Chris D. Jones Met Office
Kenneth S. Carslaw
Kenneth S. Carslaw University of Leeds
Nick Dunstone
Nick Dunstone Met Office
Stephen Sitch
Stephen Sitch University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students look for programs that balance academic rigor with flexibility, leading some to consider the easiest bachelor degree to get options as a way to begin their educational journey with confidence.

Geoscience and geology are closely connected disciplines that deepen understanding of Earth's processes. Pursuing an online geology degree can provide valuable insights into environmental challenges while offering flexible learning schedules ideal for working professionals.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) holds significant importance in environmental studies, as spatial data analysis is crucial for effective environmental management. Students can explore the best GIS programs in the US to gain practical skills that are highly sought after in various environmental careers.

For those aiming to transition into leadership roles within public administration related to environmental policy, a 1 year MPA online program offers an accelerated pathway to develop essential management expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Ben B. B. Booth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles