World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6241 5802 3377 3061 131 7432

Lauri A. Pasch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lauri A. Pasch between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lauri A. Pasch published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2008. 4 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2008. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 12 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lauri A. Pasch: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 5
2003 2
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 1
2008 12
2009 4
2010 5
2011 5
2012 9
2013 9
2014 7
2015 9
2016 6
2017 12
2018 10
2019 2
2020 5
2021 12
2022 10
2023 9
2024 7
2025 3
2026 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

Lauri A. Pasch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lauri A. Pasch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 131
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lauri A. Pasch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lauri A. Pasch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lauri A. Pasch is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable emphasis on reproductive medicine, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

The scientist has a significant number of publications in the area of reproductive health and technologies, with related research topics including assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy, ovarian function and disorders, reproductive biology and fertility, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, ethics and legal issues in pediatric healthcare, as well as eating disorders and behaviors.

Pasch has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • Obesity and depression are risk factors for future eating disorder-related attitudes and behaviors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 2020, Fertility and Sterility
  • Social Anxiety Disorder and Social Support Behavior in Friendships, 2020, Behavior Therapy
  • Association of obstructive sleep apnea risk with depression and anxiety symptoms in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 2021, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
  • Effect of acupuncture on IVF-related anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • The development of a comprehensive multidisciplinary endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain center, 2020, Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders

Pasch frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
  • F&S Reports
  • Behavior Therapy

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pasch include:

  • Heather G. Huddleston
  • Marcelle I. Cedars
  • Eleni A. Greenwood
  • Patricia E. Hershberger
  • Agatha M. Gallo

Best Publications

  • Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction.

    Lauri A. Pasch;Thomas N. Bradbury

  • Perceived Discrimination, Perceived Stress, and Mental and Physical Health Among Mexican-Origin Adults

    Elena Flores;Jeanne M. Tschann;Juanita M. Dimas;Elizabeth A. Bachen

  • Social support, problem solving, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage.

    Kieran T. Sullivan;Lauri A. Pasch;Matthew D. Johnson;Thomas N. Bradbury

  • Perceived racial/ethnic discrimination, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and health risk behaviors among Mexican American adolescents.

    Elena Flores;Jeanne M. Tschann;Juanita M. Dimas;Lauri A. Pasch

  • Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study

    Patricia Katz;Jonathan Showstack;James F. Smith;Robert D. Nachtigall

  • The use of complementary and alternative fertility treatment in couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective cohort in the United States

    James F. Smith;Michael L. Eisenberg;Susan G. Millstein;Robert D. Nachtigall

  • Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital interaction

    Lauri A. Pasch;Thomas N. Bradbury;Joanne Davila

  • Differences between husbands' and wives' approach to infertility affect marital communication and adjustment.

    Lauri A. Pasch;Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Andrew Christensen

  • Psychological distress and in vitro fertilization outcome

    Lauri A. Pasch;Steven E. Gregorich;Patricia K. Katz;Susan G. Millstein

  • Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis.

    James F. Smith;Thomas J. Walsh;Alan W. Shindel;Paul J. Turek

  • Addressing the needs of fertility treatment patients and their partners: are they informed of and do they receive mental health services?

    Lauri A. Pasch;Sarah R. Holley;Maria E. Bleil;Dena Shehab

  • Partner support and marital satisfaction: Support amount, adequacy, provision, and solicitation

    Erika E. Lawrence;Mali Bunde;Robin A. Barry;Rebecca L. Brock

  • Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States

    James F. Smith;Michael L. Eisenberg;David Glidden;Susan G. Millstein

  • Violence Perpetration Across Peer and Partner Relationships: Co-occurrence and Longitudinal Patterns Among Adolescents

    Emily J Ozer;Jeanne M Tschann;Lauri A Pasch;Elena Flores

  • Parental feeding practices in Mexican American families: initial test of an expanded measure

    Jeanne M Tschann;Steven E Gregorich;Carlos Penilla;Lauri A Pasch

  • To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation

    Eleni A. Greenwood;Lauri A. Pasch;Jordan Hastie;Marcelle I. Cedars

  • Parental feeding practices and child weight status in Mexican American families: a longitudinal analysis

    Jeanne M. Tschann;Suzanna M. Martinez;Carlos Penilla;Steven E. Gregorich

  • Prevalence and Predictors of Major Depressive Disorder for Fertility Treatment Patients and their Partners

    Sarah R. Holley;Lauri A. Pasch;Maria E. Bleil;Steven Gregorich

  • How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics.

    Dena Shehab;Julia Duff;Lauri A. Pasch;Kirstin Mac Dougall

  • Predicting participation in premarital prevention programs: the health belief model and social norms.

    Kieran T. Sullivan;Lauri A. Pasch;Tara Cornelius;Ellen Cirigliano

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne M. Tschann
Jeanne M. Tschann University of California, San Francisco
Nancy E. Adler
Nancy E. Adler University of California, San Francisco
Patricia P. Katz
Patricia P. Katz University of California, San Francisco
Julianna Deardorff
Julianna Deardorff University of California, Berkeley
Thomas N. Bradbury
Thomas N. Bradbury University of California, Los Angeles
Emily J. Ozer
Emily J. Ozer University of California, Berkeley
Thomas J. Walsh
Thomas J. Walsh Weill Cornell Medicine
Richard S. Legro
Richard S. Legro Pennsylvania State University
Barbara VanOss Marin
Barbara VanOss Marin University of California, San Francisco
Barbara Sternfeld
Barbara Sternfeld Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways, especially in mental health counseling and therapy. Online programs now make it easier to earn qualifications at your own pace, whether aiming for a broad foundation or a specialized focus like Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT).

Becoming an MFT requires careful consideration of certification requirements, which vary significantly by location. For example, aspiring therapists should review details for how to become an mft in Lubbock, as well as understand the Madison mft certification requirements. Each state and city may have unique coursework, supervised experience, and examination expectations.

If you’re considering working in different regions, it’s essential to look into both Memphis mft certification requirements and Mesa mft certification requirements to understand geographic differences. By exploring related online psychology degrees and their associated pathways, you'll better prepare for a successful, flexible career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Lauri A. Pasch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles