World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James M. Murphy

James M. Murphy

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 53 4130 3952 318 309 101 30191

James M. Murphy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James M. Murphy between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James M. Murphy published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2010. 5 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2010. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James M. Murphy: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 6
2007 8
2008 2
2009 7
2010 14
2011 1
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 2
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 2
2020 9
2021 5
2022 4
2023 1
2024 1
2025 4
2026 1
Total 114
Download as CSV

James M. Murphy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 101 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 101
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

James M. Murphy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217 53
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

James M. Murphy is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within environmental and earth sciences, with a focus on climate variability and models as well as meteorological phenomena and simulations.

The main fields of study in Murphy's work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broader fields, their research further covers several subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology
  • Media Technology

The core topics they have worked on include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

James M. Murphy has published in several frequent venues, reflecting the thematic focus of their research. They have contributed notably to:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Climate
  • Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Murphy include:

  • The Recent Decline and Recovery of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall: Relative Roles of External Forcing and Internal Variability, 2020, Journal of Climate
  • Eastward shift and extension of ENSO-induced tropical precipitation anomalies under global warming, 2020, Science Advances
  • A perturbed parameter ensemble of HadGEM3-GC3.05 coupled model projections: part 1: selecting the parameter combinations, 2021, Climate Dynamics
  • A perturbed parameter ensemble of HadGEM3-GC3.05 coupled model projections: part 2: global performance and future changes, 2021, Climate Dynamics
  • Response of Pink salmon to climate warming in the northern Bering Sea, 2020, Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography

Their frequent collaborators include Elizabeth Kendon, Robin Clark, John W. Rostron, Ben Booth, and Glen Harris, with collaboration counts ranging from three to four co-authored works.

Best Publications

  • Global climate projections. Chapter 10

    G A Meehl;T F Stocker;W D Collins;P Friedlingstein

  • Global climate projections

    G.A. Meehl;T. F. Stocker;W. D. Collins;P. Friedlingstein

  • Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations

    James M. Murphy;David M. H. Sexton;David N. Barnett;Gareth S. Jones

  • Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases.

    David A. Stainforth;T. Aina;C. Christensen;M. Collins

  • UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change projections

    J.M. Murphy;D.M.H. Sexton;G.J. Jenkins;B.B.B. Booth

  • Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model.

    Doug M. Smith;Stephen Cusack;Andrew W. Colman;Chris K. Folland

  • Decadal Prediction: Can It Be Skillful?

    Gerald A. Meehl;Lisa M. Goddard;James Murphy;Ronald J. Stouffer

  • An Evaluation of Statistical and Dynamical Techniques for Downscaling Local Climate

    James Murphy

  • A Summary of the CMIP5 Experiment Design

    Karl E. Taylor;Ronald J. Stouffer;Gerald A. Meehl;Peter Cox

  • HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology. II. Damage and Loss Assessment

    Charles Scawthorn;Paul Flores;Neil Blais;Hope Seligson

  • UK Climate Projections Briefing Report

    Geoff J Jenkins;James M Murphy;David M Sexton;Jason A Lowe

  • Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;Glen R. Harris;James M. Murphy

  • A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles

    J.M Murphy;B.B.B Booth;M Collins;G.R Harris

  • Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part 1: Control Climate and Flux Adjustment

    J. M. Murphy

  • Skilful multi-year predictions of Atlantic hurricane frequency

    Doug M. Smith;Rosie Eade;Nick J. Dunstone;David Fereday

  • Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;B. Bhaskaran;Glen R. Harris

  • Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part II: Spatial and Temporal Structure of Response

    J. M. Murphy;J. F. B. Mitchell

  • Simulation of climate change over europe using a nested regional‐climate model. II: Comparison of driving and regional model responses to a doubling of carbon dioxide

    R. G. Jones;J. M. Murphy;M. Noguer;A. B. Keen

  • A Review of Uncertainties in Global Temperature Projections over the Twenty-First Century

    R. Knutti;M. R. Allen;P. Friedlingstein;J. M. Gregory;J. M. Gregory

  • HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology. I: Overview and Flood Hazard Characterization

    Charles Scawthorn;Neil Blais;Hope Seligson;Eric Tate

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew D. Collins
Matthew D. Collins University of Reading
Doug Smith
Doug Smith Met Office
Mark J. Webb
Mark J. Webb Met Office
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
Gerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
Adam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife Met Office
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career paths. Many students seek affordable options, and programs like the fully funded dsw programs online offer financial relief for advanced studies that intersect with environmental policy and social work.

If you prefer a broader academic foundation, pursuing one of the cheapest online general studies degree programs can help you gain essential skills with flexibility and affordability. This approach suits those undecided about a specific focus but still eager to contribute to environmental fields.

For students interested in geology and earth systems, an online geoscience degree provides specialized knowledge vital for careers ranging from natural resource management to environmental consulting.

Also, considering ease of completion is important. Exploring what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get online can help identify programs that balance rigor with accessibility, supporting those transitioning into environmental careers efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles