World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
12605
World Ranking
18232
National Ranking
7451

Denise M. Tieman publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denise M. Tieman sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 87 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Denise M. Tieman D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denise M. Tieman sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Denise M. Tieman is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and specializes in research within Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Insect Science, and Genetics.

The primary focus of their research includes topics such as Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management, Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis, Plant Gene Expression Analysis, Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies, Horticultural and Viticultural Research, Plant Reproductive Biology, and Plant Virus Research Studies.

Denise M. Tieman has published extensively, with frequent appearances in such venues as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Plant Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Plant Journal, and PLoS Genetics. The scholar has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Harry J. Klee, Esther van der Knaap, Patricio Muñoz, Lara Pereira, and Ana L. Caicedo.

Recent significant publications include:

  • Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato, 2020, Cell
  • Metabolomic selection for enhanced fruit flavor, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • A Review of the Fruit Volatiles Found in Blueberry and Other Vaccinium Species, 2020, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
  • A multi-omics framework reveals strawberry flavor genes and their regulatory elements, 2022, New Phytologist
  • Terpene volatiles mediates the chemical basis of blueberry aroma and consumer acceptability, 2022, Food Research International

Best Publications

  • A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor

    Denise Tieman;Guangtao Zhu;Marcio F. R. Resende;Tao Lin

  • Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato.

    Michael Alonge;Xingang Wang;Matthias Benoit;Matthias Benoit;Sebastian Soyk

  • The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes and a rare allele regulating fruit flavor.

    Lei Gao;Itay Gonda;Itay Gonda;Honghe Sun;Qiyue Ma

  • Tomato aromatic amino acid decarboxylases participate in synthesis of the flavor volatiles 2-phenylethanol and 2-phenylacetaldehyde

    Denise Tieman;Mark Taylor;Nicolas Schauer;Alisdair R. Fernie

  • The tomato ethylene receptors NR and LeETR4 are negative regulators of ethylene response and exhibit functional compensation within a multigene family

    Denise M. Tieman;Mark G. Taylor;Joseph A. Ciardi;Harry J. Klee

  • Ethylene receptor degradation controls the timing of ripening in tomato fruit.

    Brian M. Kevany;Denise M. Tieman;Mark G. Taylor;Valeriano Dal Cin

  • The chemical interactions underlying tomato flavor preferences.

    Denise Tieman;Peter Bliss;Lauren M. McIntyre;Adilia Blandon-Ubeda

  • Combined transcriptome, genetic diversity and metabolite profiling in tomato fruit reveals that the ethylene response factor SlERF6 plays an important role in ripening and carotenoid accumulation

    Je Min Lee;Je-Gun Joung;Ryan McQuinn;Mi-Young Chung

  • An Antisense Pectin Methylesterase Gene Alters Pectin Chemistry and Soluble Solids in Tomato Fruit.

    Denise M. Tieman;Robert W. Harriman;G. Ramamohan;Avtar K. Handa

  • Differential regulation of the tomato ETR gene family throughout plant development.

    Coralie C. Lashbrook;Denise M. Tieman;Harry J. Klee

  • Members of the tomato LeEIL (EIN3-like) gene family are functionally redundant and regulate ethylene responses throughout plant development.

    Denise M. Tieman;Joseph A. Ciardi;Mark G. Taylor;Harry J. Klee

  • Chilling-induced tomato flavor loss is associated with altered volatile synthesis and transient changes in DNA methylation

    Bo Zhang;Bo Zhang;Denise M. Tieman;Chen Jiao;Yimin Xu

  • Strawberry Flavor: Diverse Chemical Compositions, a Seasonal Influence, and Effects on Sensory Perception

    Michael L. Schwieterman;Thomas A. Colquhoun;Elizabeth A. Jaworski;Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Identification of loci affecting flavour volatile emissions in tomato fruits

    Denise M. Tieman;Michelle Zeigler;Eric A. Schmelz;Mark G. Taylor

  • Response to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in tomato involves regulation of ethylene receptor gene expression.

    Joseph A. Ciardi;Denise M. Tieman;Steven T. Lund;Jeffrey B. Jones

  • Differential Expression of Two Novel Members of the Tomato Ethylene-Receptor Family

    Denise M. Tieman;Harry J. Klee

  • Reduction in Pectin Methylesterase Activity Modifies Tissue Integrity and Cation Levels in Ripening Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Fruits.

    Denise M. Tieman;Avtar K. Handa

  • The genetics of fruit flavour preferences.

    Harry J Klee;Denise M Tieman

  • Ethylene-Regulated Floral Volatile Synthesis in Petunia Corollas

    Beverly A. Underwood;Denise M. Tieman;Kenichi Shibuya;Richard J. Dexter

  • Flavour compounds in tomato fruits: identification of loci and potential pathways affecting volatile composition

    Sandrine Mathieu;Valeriano Dal Cin;Zhangjun Fei;Hua Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry J. Klee
Harry J. Klee University of Florida
James J. Giovannoni
James J. Giovannoni Boyce Thompson Institute
Zhangjun Fei
Zhangjun Fei Cornell University
Avtar K. Handa
Avtar K. Handa Purdue University West Lafayette
Eric A. Schmelz
Eric A. Schmelz University of California, San Diego
Alisdair R. Fernie
Alisdair R. Fernie Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology
Charles A. Sims
Charles A. Sims University of Florida
Sanwen Huang
Sanwen Huang Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Dani Zamir
Dani Zamir Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jeffrey B. Jones
Jeffrey B. Jones University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to many exciting health and science careers. For those looking to advance their qualifications, online degrees can provide flexible study options tailored to your professional goals.

If you are interested in nursing leadership without the clinical component, consider online dnp programs. These programs focus on leadership, policy, and administration, perfect for aspiring healthcare managers.

For a broader administrative trajectory within healthcare, online doctoral programs healthcare administration offer in-depth knowledge of healthcare systems, leadership, and policy planning.

Those keen on pharmaceutical sciences can find opportunity in online pharm d programs. These advanced online programs prepare students for high-level pharmacy roles, research, and teaching.

Additionally, if your interest lies at the intersection of biology and human performance, look into online exercise science degree offerings. These programs equip graduates for dynamic careers in fitness, wellness, and rehabilitation.

Best Scientists Citing Denise M. Tieman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles