World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
67
Citations
13502
World Ranking
2310
National Ranking
950

Arnold L. Smith publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 210 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Arnold L. Smith D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arnold L. Smith is affiliated with the Center for Infectious Disease Research in the United States. The affiliation indicates a focus on infectious diseases, suggesting involvement in research that addresses pathogens, disease mechanisms, or public health challenges related to infections.

There are no recent papers available to detail the specific topics or findings of their research. Similarly, no information on frequent co-authors or publication venues has been provided, leaving the collaborative context and preferred outlets for dissemination unspecified.

The lack of details regarding main fields and subfields of study, as well as specific topics of work, limits the ability to further categorize Arnold L. Smith's expertise or areas of scientific inquiry. No book publications or awards have been recorded.

Despite the limited data, the association with a research center focusing on infectious diseases positions this scientist within the biomedical and clinical research communities involved in studying infectious agents and possibly development of related therapies or diagnostics.

Best Publications

  • Intermittent Administration of Inhaled Tobramycin in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

    B W Ramsey;M S Pepe;J M Quan;K L Otto

  • Longitudinal assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in young children with cystic fibrosis.

    Jane L. Burns;Ronald L. Gibson;Sharon McNamara;Darlene Yim

  • Early pulmonary infection, inflammation, and clinical outcomes in infants with cystic fibrosis.

    Margaret Rosenfeld;Ronald L. Gibson;Sharon McNamara;Julia Emerson

  • Susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and clinical response to parenteral antibiotic administration: lack of association in cystic fibrosis.

    Arnold L. Smith;Stanley B. Fiel;Nicole Mayer-Hamblett;Bonnie Ramsey

  • Effect of Chronic Intermittent Administration of Inhaled Tobramycin on Respiratory Microbial Flora in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

    Jane L. Burns;Jill M. Van Dalfsen;Ribhi M. Shawar;Kelly L. Otto

  • Aminoglycoside penetration, inactivation, and efficacy in cystic fibrosis sputum

    Paul M. Mendelman;Arnold L. Smith;Jack Levy;Allan Weber

  • Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: understanding virulence and commensal behavior

    Alice L. Erwin;Arnold L. Smith

  • Safety of aerosol tobramycin administration for 3 months to patients with cystic fibrosis

    Arnold L. Smith;Bonnie W. Ramsey;Donna L. Hedges;Barbara Hack

  • Antibiotic pharmacokinetics in cystic fibrosis. Differences and clinical significance.

    de Groot R;Smith Al;Smith Al

  • Use of fluoroquinolones in pediatrics: consensus report of an International Society of Chemotherapy commission.

    Urs B. Schaad;Mohammed Abdus Salam;Yannick Aujard;Ron Dagan

  • In vitro antibacterial activity of fluorinated analogs of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol.

    V P Syriopoulou;A L Harding;D A Goldmann;A L Smith

  • Macromolecular mechanisms of sputum inhibition of tobramycin activity.

    B E Hunt;A Weber;A Berger;B Ramsey

  • Disposition of tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis: A prospective controlled study

    Jack Levy;Arnold L. Smith;Jeffrey R. Koup;Judy Williams-Warren

  • A Comparison of Peak Sputum Tobramycin Concentration in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Using Jet and Ultrasonic Nebulizer Systems

    Jay Eisenberg;Margaret Pepe;Michael Vasiliev;A. Bruce Montgomery

  • Effect of nebulizer type and antibiotic concentration on device performance.

    Allan Weber;Greg Morlin;Morty Cohen;Judy Williams-Warren

  • Comparison of a β-lactam alone versus β-lactam and an aminoglycoside for pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis

    Arnold L. Smith;Carl Doershuk;Donald Goldmann;Edward Gore

  • The Effect of Respiratory Viral Infections on Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

    Bonnie W. Ramsey;Edmond J. Gore;Arnold L. Smith;Marion K. Cooney

  • Characterization of Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Invasive Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae

    Alice L. Erwin;Kevin L. Nelson;Tendai Mhlanga-Mutangadura;Paul J. Bonthuis

  • A biphasic epigenetic switch controls immunoevasion, virulence and niche adaptation in non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae.

    John M. Atack;Yogitha N. Srikhanta;Yogitha N. Srikhanta;Kate L. Fox;Joseph A. Jurcisek

  • Sequence and functional analyses of Haemophilus spp. genomic islands

    Mario Juhas;Peter M. Power;Rosalind M. Harding;David J P Ferguson

  • Use of Bacterial Antigen Detection in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

    Bonnie W. Ramsey;Edgar K. Marcuse;Hjordis M. Foy;Marion K. Cooney

  • Selective media for the quantitation of bacteria in cystic fibrosis sputum

    K. Wong;M. C. Roberts;L. Owens;M. Fife

  • Early phase II trial of human rotavirus vaccine candidate RV3.

    Graeme L Barnes;Jennifer S Lund;Susan V Mitchell;Leonie De Bruyn

  • A virulent nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae.

    Victor Nizet;Kenneth F. Colina;Jon R. Almquist;Craig E. Rubens

  • Characterization of Haemophilus influenzae type b fimbriae.

    T L Stull;P M Mendelman;J E Haas;M A Schoenborn

  • Hypermutable Haemophilus influenzae with mutations in mutS are found in cystic fibrosis sputum

    Michael E. Watson;Michael E. Watson;Jane L. Burns;Arnold L. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Bonnie W. Ramsey
Bonnie W. Ramsey University of Washington
Jashvant D. Unadkat
Jashvant D. Unadkat University of Washington
Christopher B. Wilson
Christopher B. Wilson Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Marilyn C. Roberts
Marilyn C. Roberts University of Washington
Jane L. Burns
Jane L. Burns University of Washington
Paul M. Mendelman
Paul M. Mendelman Takeda (Japan)
David W. Scheifele
David W. Scheifele University of British Columbia
Donald A. Goldmann
Donald A. Goldmann Boston Children's Hospital
Robert S. Daum
Robert S. Daum University of Chicago
Bernhard O. Palsson
Bernhard O. Palsson University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Microbiology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities, especially in healthcare and data management. Programs like the certified professional coder certification offer specialized credentials for those interested in medical coding, a critical role in healthcare billing and documentation.

Health information management is another promising field. Graduates can pursue degrees such as the accredited online health information management degree cahiim, which ensures a recognized standard in managing patient data and healthcare systems efficiently.

Entry-level positions, including health information management roles, often come with competitive pay. For specific insight, review the health information management salary entry-level data to better understand this career’s earning potential and growth.

For those looking to quickly enter the healthcare workforce, the fast track medical billing and coding certificate online programs offer an efficient pathway. These certificates can accelerate your career start and complement a microbiology background with essential healthcare administrative skills.

Best Scientists Citing Arnold L. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles