World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 46 19001 17413 447 403 75 6106

Arko Gorter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arko Gorter between 1987 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arko Gorter published across 36 years, from 1987 to 2022, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2015. 1 of the 76 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2015. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1987 2022

76 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arko Gorter: publications per year, 1987 to 2022
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 2
1999 4
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 5
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 3
2013 1
2014 2
2015 7
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 76
Download as CSV

Arko Gorter publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arko Gorter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 67–76 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 75 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106 75
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Arko Gorter D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arko Gorter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504 46
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Arko Gorter is affiliated with the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research is concentrated primarily within the fields of Medicine and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, with specific subfields including Hepatology, Epidemiology, and Pharmacology.

Their scholarly work focuses mainly on topics related to liver health, with emphasis on Liver Disease and Transplantation, Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, and Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection.

Gorter's recent publication includes the paper titled Distinct responses between healthy and cirrhotic human livers upon lipopolysaccharide challenge: possible implications for acute-on-chronic liver failure, published in 2022 in the American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. This publication has accrued citations reflecting academic engagement with the work.

Their academic collaborations involve frequent co-authors such as Su Suriguga, Mei Li, Theerut Luangmonkong, Miriam Boersema, and Koert P. de Jong.

Arko Gorter has published predominantly in the American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, indicating a specialized interest in this journal's focus areas.

  • Medicine
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

  • Hepatology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pharmacology

  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

  • Distinct responses between healthy and cirrhotic human livers upon lipopolysaccharide challenge: possible implications for acute-on-chronic liver failure (2022), American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology

  • Su Suriguga
  • Mei Li
  • Theerut Luangmonkong
  • Miriam Boersema
  • Koert P. de Jong

  • American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology

Best Publications

  • Blockade of the granzyme B/perforin pathway through overexpression of the serine protease inhibitor PI-9/SPI-6 constitutes a mechanism for immune escape by tumors

    J. P. Medema;J. de Jong;L. T. C. Peltenburg;E. M. E. Verdegaal

  • M2 macrophages induced by prostaglandin E2 and IL-6 from cervical carcinoma are switched to activated M1 macrophages by CD4+ Th1 cells.

    Moniek Heusinkveld;Peggy J. de Vos van Steenwijk;Renske Goedemans;Tamara H. Ramwadhdoebe

  • Complement function in mAb-mediated cancer immunotherapy

    Kyra A. Gelderman;Stephen Tomlinson;Gordon D. Ross;Arko Gorter

  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I, MHC Class I Chain-Related Molecule A, and CD8+/Regulatory T-Cell Ratio: Which Variable Determines Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients?

    Ekaterina S. Jordanova;Arko Gorter;Ouissam Ayachi;Frans Prins

  • Immune evasion of tumor cells using membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins

    Arko Gorter;Seppo Meri

  • Activation of the alternative pathway of complement by human serum IgA.

    P S Hiemstra;A Gorter;M E Stuurman;L A Van Es

  • Overexpression of the alpha v beta 6 integrin in cervical squamous cell carcinoma is a prognostic factor for decreased survival

    S Hazelbag;GG Kenter;A Gorter;EJ Dreef

  • Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.

    Judith N Kloth;Jan Oosting;Tom van Wezel;Karoly Szuhai

  • Systemic and local human papillomavirus 16‐specific T‐cell immunity in patients with head and neck cancer

    M. Heusinkveld;R. Goedemans;R.J.P. Briet;H. Gelderblom

  • Angels and demons: Th17 cells represent a beneficial response, while neutrophil IL-17 is associated with poor prognosis in squamous cervical cancer.

    Simone Punt;Gert Jan Fleuren;Eva Kritikou;Erik Lubberts

  • Selective transfer of a lipophilic prodrug of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine from immunoliposomes to colon cancer cells

    Gerben A. Koning;Henriëtte W.M. Morselt;Maria J. Velinova;Jan Donga

  • Cytokine profile of cervical cancer cells

    Suzanne Hazelbag;Gert Jan Fleuren;J.J. Baelde;Ed Schuuring

  • The correlations between IL-17 vs. Th17 cells and cancer patient survival: a systematic review

    Simone Punt;Jessica M. Langenhoff;H. Putter;Gert Jan Fleuren

  • The inhibitory effect of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on complement activation after immunotherapeutic treatment of cervical carcinoma cells with monoclonal antibodies or bispecific monoclonal antibodies.

    Kyra A Gelderman;Vanessa T Blok;Gert Jan Fleuren;Arko Gorter

  • Tumor-infiltrating CD14-positive myeloid cells and CD8-positive T-cells prolong survival in patients with cervical carcinoma.

    P.J. de Vos van Steenwijk;T.H. Ramwadhdoebe;R. Goedemans;E.M. Doorduijn

  • A beneficial tumor microenvironment in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is characterized by a high T cell and low IL-17(+) cell frequency

    Simone Punt;Emilie A. C. Dronkers;Marij J. P. Welters;Renske Goedemans

  • Critical role of endoglin in tumor cell plasticity of Ewing sarcoma and melanoma

    E Pardali;van der Dwj Daisy Schaft;E Wiercinska;A Gorter

  • The absence of CCL2 expression in cervical carcinoma is associated with increased survival and loss of heterozygosity at 17q11.2.

    H J M A A Zijlmans;G J Fleuren;H J Baelde;P H C Eilers

  • Cervical cancer cell-derived interleukin-6 impairs CCR7-dependent migration of MMP-9-expressing dendritic cells.

    Jennifer Pahne-Zeppenfeld;Nadine Schröer;Barbara Walch-Rückheim;Monika Oldak

  • Expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on renal tumor cell lines and their role in preventing complement-mediated tumor cell lysis

    A. Gorter;V. T. Blok;W. H. B. Haasnoot;N. G. Ensink

Frequent Co-Authors

Gert Jan Fleuren
Gert Jan Fleuren Leiden University Medical Center
Ekaterina S. Jordanova
Ekaterina S. Jordanova Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gemma G. Kenter
Gemma G. Kenter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mohamed R. Daha
Mohamed R. Daha Leiden University
Gerrit L. Scherphof
Gerrit L. Scherphof University of Groningen
Pieter S. Hiemstra
Pieter S. Hiemstra Leiden University Medical Center
Sjoerd H. van der Burg
Sjoerd H. van der Burg Leiden University Medical Center
Theresa M. Allen
Theresa M. Allen University of Alberta
Arjan W. Griffioen
Arjan W. Griffioen University of Amsterdam
Seppo Meri
Seppo Meri University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to many in-demand careers, especially in healthcare and biotechnology. Advanced programs like an MBA in Healthcare Management blend science with business, enhancing career prospects. If you’re concerned about tuition, consider comparing healthcare mba cost to find affordable options.

Looking for specialized roles outside of research or labs? Medical coding and billing are popular career pathways for biology graduates. Credentials such as cpc certification can enhance your employability and salary prospects. If you’re curious about the earning potential, learn how much do medical coders make and what factors impact income.

Before starting, weigh the is medical billing and coding worth it pros and cons. This can help you decide if a flexible, remote-friendly healthcare career aligns with your goals. Whichever path you choose, your background in Biology or Biochemistry will provide a strong foundation for success.

Best Scientists Citing Arko Gorter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles