World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
15026
World Ranking
7890
National Ranking
2798

Andrew G. Slater publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. Slater sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 71 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew G. Slater D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. Slater sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew G. Slater was affiliated with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences in the United States. Their professional career was connected to this institution, contributing to the scientific research community focused on environmental sciences.

Throughout their career, Slater did not have any recorded recent papers or publications with specified titles, years, or venues available in the provided data. Additionally, there are no listed frequent co-authors or common publication venues in which they regularly published.

Their main areas of study, including primary fields, subfields, and main research topics, are not detailed in the available information. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards attributed to them in the data provided.

While specific details on their body of work are limited in this context, their association with a prominent environmental research institute suggests involvement in environmental and atmospheric sciences research activities during their career.

Best Publications

  • Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM)

    W. Oleson;M. Lawrence;B. Bonan;G. Flanner

  • The Community Land Model version 5 : description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty

    David M. Lawrence;Rosie A. Fisher;Charles D. Koven;Keith W. Oleson

  • Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model

    David M Lawrence;Keith W Oleson;Mark G Flanner;Peter E Thornton

  • The large-scale freshwater cycle of the Arctic

    Mark C. Serreze;Andrew P. Barrett;Andrew G. Slater;Rebecca A. Woodgate

  • Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models

    Martyn P. Clark;Andrew G. Slater;David E. Rupp;Ross A. Woods

  • A projection of severe near‐surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century

    David M. Lawrence;Andrew G. Slater

  • Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model

    Martyn P. Clark;David E. Rupp;Ross A. Woods;Xiaogu Zheng

  • Representing spatial variability of snow water equivalent in hydrologic and land-surface models: A review

    Martyn P. Clark;Jordy Hendrikx;Andrew G. Slater;Dmitri Kavetski

  • Incorporating organic soil into a global climate model

    David M. Lawrence;Andrew G. Slater

  • The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)

    A. G. Slater;A. G. Slater;C. A. Schlosser;C. E. Desborough;A. J. Pitman

  • Diagnosing Present and Future Permafrost from Climate Models

    Andrew G. Slater;David M. Lawrence

  • Accelerated Arctic land warming and permafrost degradation during rapid sea ice loss

    David M. Lawrence;Andrew G. Slater;Robert A. Tomas;Marika M. Holland

  • Sensitivity of a model projection of near‐surface permafrost degradation to soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter

    David M. Lawrence;Andrew G. Slater;Vladimir E. Romanovsky;Dmitry J. Nicolsky

  • Simulation of Present-Day and Future Permafrost and Seasonally Frozen Ground Conditions in CCSM4

    David M. Lawrence;Andrew G. Slater;Sean C. Swenson

  • The large‐scale energy budget of the Arctic

    Mark C. Serreze;Andrew P. Barrett;Andrew G. Slater;Michael Steele

  • Snow Data Assimilation via an Ensemble Kalman Filter

    Andrew G. Slater;Martyn P. Clark

  • Assimilation of snow covered area information into hydrologic and land-surface models

    Martyn P. Clark;Andrew G. Slater;Andrew P. Barrett;Lauren E. Hay

  • Permafrost thaw and resulting soil moisture changes regulate projected high-latitude CO2 and CH4 emissions

    D. M. Lawrence;C. D. Koven;S. C. Swenson;W. J. Riley

  • Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS phase 2(d).

    C. Adam Schlosser;Andrew G. Slater;Alan Robock;Andrew J. Pitman

  • Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in Complex Terrain

    Martyn P. Clark;Andrew G. Slater

  • Hydrological Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Use of Streamflow Observations to Update States in a Distributed Hydrological Model

    R. P. Ibbitt;M. P. Clark;R. A. Woods;X. Zheng

  • Near-term climate change:Projections and predictability

    Nathaniel L. Bindoff;Paul J. Durack;Andrew Slater;Philip Cameron-Smith

  • Diagnosing Present and Future Permafrost from Climate Models

    D. M. Lawrence;A. G. Slater

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Lawrence
David M. Lawrence National Center for Atmospheric Research
Martyn P. Clark
Martyn P. Clark University of Saskatchewan
Sean Swenson
Sean Swenson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Mark C. Serreze
Mark C. Serreze University of Colorado Boulder
Andrew J. Pitman
Andrew J. Pitman University of New South Wales
Ross Woods
Ross Woods University of Bristol
Charles D. Koven
Charles D. Koven Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Alan Robock
Alan Robock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Zong-Liang Yang
Zong-Liang Yang The University of Texas at Austin
David Lawrence
David Lawrence University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Environmental Sciences often leads to diverse academic and professional opportunities. For those interested in earth processes and natural resource management, pursuing the best online geology degree can provide a solid foundation in understanding the planet's physical structure and processes.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly vital for environmental professionals focused on spatial data and mapping. Students can advance their expertise through renowned programs like those highlighted in the best GIS undergraduate programs.

For leadership and policy impact within environmental sectors, an online Master of Public Administration (MPA) offers strategic skills in governance and management. Prospective students can identify top credentials with resources such as the best online MPA programs.

Understanding the social aspects of environmental issues is equally important. Degrees like an online sociology bachelor's can equip future professionals to analyze human-environment interactions, as detailed by the sociology bachelor degree online options.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew G. Slater

Recently Published Articles