World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
38
Citations
9738
World Ranking
1822
National Ranking
15

Amanda Shantz publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Shantz sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 100 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Amanda Shantz D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Shantz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model

    Kerstin Alfes;Amanda Shantz;Catherine Truss;Emma Soane

  • The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model

    Kerstin Alfes;Amanda Shantz;Catherine Truss;Emma Soane

  • Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory

    Catherine Truss;Amanda Shantz;Emma Soane;Kerstin Alfes

  • Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: the ISA engagement scale

    Emma Soane;Catherine Truss;Kerstin Alfes;Amanda Shantz

  • Development and Application of a New Measure of Employee Engagement: the ISA Engagement Scale

    Emma Soane;Catherine Truss;Kerstin Alfes;Amanda Shantz

  • The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours

    Amanda Shantz;Kerstin Alfes;Catherine Truss;Emma Soane

  • The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours

    Amanda Shantz;Kerstin Alfes;Catherine Truss;Emma Soane

  • Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory

    Catherine Truss;Amanda Shantz;Emma Soane;Kerstin Alfes

  • Employee engagement in multinational organizations

    Catherine Truss;Kerstin Alfes;Rick Delbridge;Amanda Shantz

  • The association of meaningfulness, wellbeing and engagement with absenteeism: a moderated mediation model

    Emma Soane;Amanda Shantz;Kerstin Alfes;Catherine Truss

  • Attribution theories in human resource management research: a review and research agenda

    Rebecca R. Hewett;Amanda A. Shantz;Julia J. Mundy;Kerstin K. Alfes

  • The link between HR practices, performance and wellbeing: the moderating role of organisational trust

    Kerstin Alfes;Amanda Shantz;Catherine Truss

  • The Buffering Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Behavioral Outcomes

    Amanda Shantz;Kerstin Alfes;Gary P. Latham

  • An exploratory field experiment of the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance

    Amanda Shantz;Gary P. Latham

  • The mismanaged soul: Existential labor and the erosion of meaningful work

    Catherine Bailey;Adrian Madden;Kerstin Alfes;Amanda Shantz

  • The effect of HRM attributions on emotional exhaustion and the mediating roles of job involvement and work overload

    Amanda Shantz;Lilith Arevshatian;Kerstin Alfes;Catherine Bailey

  • The management of volunteers – what can human resources do? A review and research agenda

    Kerstin Alfes;Bethania Antunes;Amanda D. Shantz

  • Service employees and self-verification: The roles of occupational stigma consciousness and core self-evaluations:

    Amanda Shantz;Jonathan E Booth

  • Service employees and self-verification: the roles of occupational stigma consciousness and core self-evaluations

    Amanda Shantz;Jonathan E. Booth

  • The effect of primed goals on employee performance: Implications for human resource management

    Amanda Shantz;Gary Latham

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine Truss
Catherine Truss King's College London
Gary P. Latham
Gary P. Latham University of Toronto
Rick Delbridge
Rick Delbridge Cardiff University
Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales
Michelle Duffy
Michelle Duffy University of Newcastle Australia
Theresa M. Glomb
Theresa M. Glomb University of Minnesota
David Guest
David Guest King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Shantz

Recently Published Articles