World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Animal Science and Veterinary
Egypt
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 43 968 895 5 5 132 4872

Ahmed E. Kholif publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ahmed E. Kholif between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ahmed E. Kholif published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2024. 22 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2024. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 12 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ahmed E. Kholif: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 0
2013 1
2014 12
2015 22
2016 20
2017 16
2018 5
2019 4
2020 23
2021 14
2022 18
2023 12
2024 28
2025 21
2026 1
Total 198
Download as CSV

Ahmed E. Kholif publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed E. Kholif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 129–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 132 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89 132
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Ahmed E. Kholif D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed E. Kholif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62 43
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in Egypt Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in Egypt Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in Egypt Leader Award

Overview

Ahmed E. Kholif is affiliated with the National Research Centre in Egypt. Their research activity primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong emphasis on subfields such as Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science, Food Science, and Genetics. The main topics investigated by this researcher include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology, Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, Moringa oleifera research and applications, Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health, Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems, Reproductive Physiology in Livestock, and Animal Nutrition and Physiology.

Several papers authored by Ahmed E. Kholif reflect their research interests and contributions across various scientific venues. Notable works include:

  • Essential oils and phytogenic feed additives in ruminant diet: chemistry, ruminal microbiota and fermentation, feed utilization and productive performance, 2021, Phytochemistry Reviews
  • Phytogenic feed additives mixture enhances the lactational performance, feed utilization and ruminal fermentation of Friesian cows, 2020, Animal Biotechnology
  • A Review of Effect of Saponins on Ruminal Fermentation, Health and Performance of Ruminants, 2023, Veterinary Sciences

Other frequently cited papers relevant to their research field but authored by different researchers include:

  • Ultrasound-assisted preparation of anise extract nanoemulsion and its bioactivity against different pathogenic bacteria, 2020, Food Chemistry
  • Moringa Oleifera Oil Modulates Rumen Microflora to Mediate In Vitro Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis in Total Mix Rations, 2020, Current Microbiology

Ahmed E. Kholif has collaborated extensively with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors involved in multiple publications include:

  • Uchenna Y. Anele
  • Olurotimi A. Olafadehan
  • Gouda A. Gouda
  • Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez
  • Tarek A. Morsy

The researcher has contributed numerous articles to prominent scientific journals, showing recurring publication activity in several venues such as:

  • Annals of Animal Science
  • Animals
  • Small Ruminant Research
  • Journal of Animal Science
  • Animal Biotechnology

Best Publications

  • Moringa oleifera leaf meal as a protein source in lactating goat's diets: Feed intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, milk yield and composition, and its fatty acids profile

    A. E. Kholif;G. A. Gouda;T. A. Morsy;A. Z. M. Salem

  • Effect of feeding diets with processed Moringa oleifera meal as protein source in lactating Anglo-Nubian goats

    A.E. Kholif;T.A. Morsy;G.A. Gouda;U.Y. Anele

  • Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization of low quality roughages in ruminants

    Mona M Y Elghandour;Abdelfattah Z M Salem;Jose S Martínez Castañeda;Luis M Camacho

  • Essential oils and phytogenic feed additives in ruminant diet: chemistry, ruminal microbiota and fermentation, feed utilization and productive performance

    Ahmed E. Kholif;Olurotimi A. Olafadehan

  • Effect of Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus) ensilaging with two developed enzyme cocktails on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation in sheep.

    Haidy Alsersy;Abdelfattah Z. M. Salem;Abdelfattah Z. M. Salem;Borhami E. Borhami;Jaime Olivares

  • Effects of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae at Direct Addition or Pre-incubation on in Vitro Gas Production Kinetics and Degradability of Four Fibrous Feeds

    Mona M.Y. Elghandour;Juan C.Vázquez Chagoyán;Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem;Ahmed E. Kholif

  • Effects of replacement of Moringa oleifera for berseem clover in the diets of Nubian goats on feed utilisation, and milk yield, composition and fatty acid profile.

    A.E. Kholif;G.A. Gouda;O.A. Olafadehan;M.M. Abdo

  • Nutrient Digestibility, Ruminal Fermentation Activities, Serum Parameters and Milk Production and Composition of Lactating Goats Fed Diets Containing Rice Straw Treated with Pleurotus ostreatus

    A. E. Kholif;H. M. Khattab;A. A. El-Shewy;A. Z. M. Salem

  • Influence of exogenous enzymes in presence of Salix babylonica extract on digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and performance of lambs fed maize silage

    K. I. Valdés;A. Z. M. Salem;Secundino López;M. U. Alonso

  • Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, and ruminal fermentation activities in sheep fed Atriplex halimus ensiled with three developed enzyme cocktails

    A.Z.M. Salem;H. Alsersy;Luisa M. Camacho;M.M. El-Adawy

  • Effects of two enzyme feed additives on digestion and milk production in lactating Egyptian buffaloes

    Tarek A. Morsy;Ahmed E. Kholif;Sobhy M. Kholif;Abdelkader M. Kholif

  • Ultrasound-assisted preparation of anise extract nanoemulsion and its bioactivity against different pathogenic bacteria.

    O.A. Ghazy;M.T. Fouad;H.H. Saleh;A.E. Kholif

  • Effect of exogenous xylanase on rumen in vitro gas production and degradability of wheat straw

    Norovsambuu Togtokhbayar;María A. Cerrillo;Germán Buendía Rodríguez;Mona M. M. Y. Elghandour

  • The effect of garlic oil, xylanase enzyme and yeast on biomethane and carbon dioxide production from 60-d old Holstein dairy calves fed a high concentrate diet

    A. Hernandez;A.E. Kholif;R. Lugo-Coyote;M.M.Y. Elghandour

  • Extract of Moringa oleifera leaves improves feed utilization of lactating Nubian goats

    A.E. Kholif;G.A. Gouda;U.Y. Anele;M.L. Galyean

  • Influence of Sunflower Whole Seeds or Oil on Ruminal Fermentation, Milk Production, Composition, and Fatty Acid Profile in Lactating Goats

    T.A. Morsy;S. M. Kholif;Ahmed Kholif;O. H. Matloup

  • Rosemary and lemongrass herbs as phytogenic feed additives to improve efficient feed utilization, manipulate rumen fermentation and elevate milk production of Damascus goats

    A.E. Kholif;O.H. Matloup;T.A. Morsy;M.M. Abdo

  • Influence of individual or mixed cellulase and xylanase mixture on in vitro rumen gas production kinetics of total mixed rations with different maize silage and concentrate ratios

    Mona Mohamed Mohamed Yasseen Elghandour;Ahmed Eid Kholif;Ofelia Mãrquez-Molina;Josã Fernando Vãzquez-Armijo

  • Performance of lactating Friesian cows fed a diet supplemented with coriander oil: feed intake, nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation, blood chemistry, and milk production.

    O.H. Matloup;A.M. Abd El Tawab;A.A. Hassan;F.I. Hadhoud

  • Anaerobic ensiling of raw agricultural waste with a fibrolytic enzyme cocktail as a cleaner and sustainable biological product

    Ahmed E. Kholif;Mona Mohamed Mohamed Yasseen Elghandour;German Buendia Rodriguez;Olurotimi Olafadehan

  • Influence of oral administration of Salix babylonica extract on milk production and composition in dairy cows

    Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem;Ahmed E. Kholif;Mona M.Y. Elghandour;German Buendía

  • Effect of Supplementing Diets of Anglo-Nubian Goats with Soybean and Flaxseed Oils on Lactational Performance

    Ahmed E. Kholif;Tarek A. Morsy;Ahmed M. Abd El Tawab;Uchenna Y. Anele

  • Moringa Oleifera Oil Modulates Rumen Microflora to Mediate In Vitro Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis in Total Mix Rations.

    Hossam M. Ebeid;Li Mengwei;Ahmed E. Kholif;Faiz-ul Hassan

  • Crushed flaxseed versus flaxseed oil in the diets of Nubian goats: Effect on feed intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, blood chemistry, milk production, milk composition and milk fatty acid profile

    A.E. Kholif;T.A. Morsy;M.M. Abdo

Frequent Co-Authors

Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem
Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem Autonomous University of Mexico State
Uchenna Y. Anele
Uchenna Y. Anele North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
Nicholas E. Odongo
Nicholas E. Odongo Pwani University
Sobhy M. A. Sallam
Sobhy M. A. Sallam Alexandria University
Secundino López
Secundino López University of Leon
M. L. Galyean
M. L. Galyean Texas Tech University
Kendall C Swanson
Kendall C Swanson North Dakota State University
Joel S. Caton
Joel S. Caton North Dakota State University
Adibe Luiz Abdalla
Adibe Luiz Abdalla Universidade de São Paulo
Amlan Kumar Patra
Amlan Kumar Patra West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Animal Science and Veterinary fields, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Psychology, counseling, and therapy programs provide valuable skills for understanding behavior and improving well-being, which are beneficial in many animal care and research contexts.

Students looking to advance in educational or clinical psychology might explore nasp approved online programs. These programs ensure quality training for school psychologists and professionals working with youth, which complements animal welfare initiatives involving children and families.

For those aiming for clinical practice, online psyd programs accredited by apa offer accredited doctoral-level options without the GRE, making advanced psychology degrees more accessible. Such training supports roles in mental health that intersect with veterinary behavioral science.

Additionally, degrees in counseling like addiction counseling online degree programs prepare professionals to address substance abuse issues, which can relate to veterinary community outreach and support services.

Similarly, online marriage and family therapy graduate programs focus on family dynamics and mental health, skills valuable for animal science professionals working in therapeutic or educational roles involving families and pets.

Best Scientists Citing Ahmed E. Kholif

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles