World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Yasuo Tano

Yasuo Tano

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9686 266 678 32961

Yasuo Tano publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yasuo Tano between 1977 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yasuo Tano published across 45 years, from 1977 to 2021, averaging 15.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 73 publications in 2008. 1 of the 688 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 73. Peak 73 publications in 2008. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 24 publications 1997: 26 publications 1998: 29 publications 1999: 24 publications 2000: 38 publications 2001: 29 publications 2002: 39 publications 2003: 56 publications 2004: 47 publications 2005: 45 publications 2006: 63 publications 2007: 71 publications 2008: 73 publications 2009: 55 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1977 2021

688 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yasuo Tano: publications per year, 1977 to 2021
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 0
1979 1
1980 4
1981 5
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 3
1993 1
1994 11
1995 12
1996 24
1997 26
1998 29
1999 24
2000 38
2001 29
2002 39
2003 56
2004 47
2005 45
2006 63
2007 71
2008 73
2009 55
2010 17
2011 3
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 688
Download as CSV

Yasuo Tano publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yasuo Tano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 678 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 678
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Yasuo Tano D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yasuo Tano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yasuo Tano was affiliated with Osaka University in Japan during their career. The information available does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or awards won. This lack of detailed data limits an extensive overview of their academic contributions and research focus.

Despite the absence of specific publications or collaborative information, being connected to Osaka University suggests involvement in Japan's academic environment. The university is known for various scientific disciplines, but no further details are provided about the scientist's specialization or research interests.

The absence of known recent papers prevents identification of specific research outputs or areas explored by Yasuo Tano. Similarly, the lack of known co-authors and publication venues means their collaborative and dissemination networks remain unspecified.

There is no record available regarding possible book publications or contributions to textbooks or monographs. Nor is there data on awards or recognitions, which if present, might have illuminated key achievements in their career.

Yasuo Tano is now deceased. The sparse information implies a need for further archival or academic resource consultation to build a more comprehensive profile of their scientific work and influence.

Best Publications

  • Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium.

    Kohji Nishida;Masayuki Yamato;Yasutaka Hayashida;Katsuhiko Watanabe

  • An SV40-immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line and its characterization.

    K Araki-Sasaki;Y Ohashi;T Sasabe;K Hayashi

  • Otx2 homeobox gene controls retinal photoreceptor cell fate and pineal gland development

    Akihiro Nishida;Akiko Furukawa;Akiko Furukawa;Chieko Koike;Yasuo Tano

  • FUNCTIONAL BIOENGINEERED CORNEAL EPITHELIAL SHEET GRAFTS FROM CORNEAL STEM CELLS EXPANDED EX VIVO ON A TEMPERATURE - RESPONSIVE CELL CULTURE SURFACE

    Kohji Nishida;Masayuki Yamato;Yasutaka Hayashida;Katsuhiko Watanabe

  • Retinal and choroidal biometry in highly myopic eyes with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

    Yasushi Ikuno;Yasuo Tano

  • Foveal Microstructure and Visual Acuity after Retinal Detachment Repair: Imaging Analysis by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

    Taku Wakabayashi;Yusuke Oshima;Hisataka Fujimoto;Yoko Murakami

  • Nestin-EGFP transgenic mice: visualization of the self-renewal and multipotency of CNS stem cells.

    Ayano Kawaguchi;Takaki Miyata;Takaki Miyata;Kazunobu Sawamoto;Noriko Takashita

  • Ranibizumab (Lucentis) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: evidence from clinical trials

    Paul Mitchell;Jean-François Korobelnik;P Lanzetta;Frank G Holz

  • Math3 and NeuroD regulate amacrine cell fate specification in the retina.

    Tomoyuki Inoue;Masato Hojo;Yasumasa Bessho;Yasuo Tano

  • A 27–Gauge Instrument System for Transconjunctival Sutureless Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery

    Yusuke Oshima;Taku Wakabayashi;Tatsuhiko Sato;Masahito Ohji

  • Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

    Fumi Gomi;Miki Sawa;Hirokazu Sakaguchi;Motokazu Tsujikawa

  • One-Year Outcomes of Photodynamic Therapy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in Japanese Patients

    Fumi Gomi;Masahito Ohji;Kaori Sayanagi;Miki Sawa

  • Pikachurin, a dystroglycan ligand, is essential for photoreceptor ribbon synapse formation

    Shigeru Sato;Yoshihiro Omori;Kimiko Katoh;Mineo Kondo

  • Inhibition of Intraocular Proliferations with Intravitreal Corticosteriods

    Yasuo Tano;Yasuo Tano;Yasuo Tano;Gentaro Sugita;Gentaro Sugita;Gentaro Sugita;Gary Abrams;Gary Abrams;Gary Abrams;Robert Machemer;Robert Machemer;Robert Machemer

  • Intravitreal Bevacizumab to Treat Iris Neovascularization and Neovascular Glaucoma Secondary to Ischemic Retinal Diseases in 41 Consecutive Cases

    Taku Wakabayashi;Yusuke Oshima;Hirokazu Sakaguchi;Yasushi Ikuno

  • Human limbal epithelium contains side population cells expressing the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2.

    Katsuhiko Watanabe;Kohji Nishida;Masayuki Yamato;Terumasa Umemoto

  • Functional human corneal endothelial cell sheets harvested from temperature-responsive culture surfaces

    Taizo Sumide;Kohji Nishida;Masayuki Yamato;Takeshi Ide

  • Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus

    Naoyuki Maeda;Takashi Fujikado;Teruhito Kuroda;Toshifumi Mihashi

  • Complications in patients after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.

    Chiharu Shima;Hirokazu Sakaguchi;Fumi Gomi;Motohiro Kamei

  • Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.

    Yasushi Ikuno;Kaori Sayanagi;Masahito Ohji;Motohiro Kamei

Frequent Co-Authors

Masayuki Yamato
Masayuki Yamato Tokyo Women's Medical University
Jun Ohta
Jun Ohta Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Yutaka Fukuda
Yutaka Fukuda Osaka University
Akihiko Kikuchi
Akihiko Kikuchi Tokyo University of Science
Shigeru Kinoshita
Shigeru Kinoshita Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Teruo Okano
Teruo Okano Tokyo Women's Medical University
Hiroshi Watanabe
Hiroshi Watanabe Kyoto University
Masaya Tohyama
Masaya Tohyama Kindai University
Takahisa Furukawa
Takahisa Furukawa Osaka University
Hiroyuki Itabe
Hiroyuki Itabe Showa University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to many related online degrees and career pathways that support and enhance healthcare delivery. One popular choice is a health administration degree, which prepares graduates for leadership roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations. These programs often focus on management, policy, and organizational skills essential in today’s complex healthcare systems.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their careers, accredited rn to np programs online offer an efficient bridge to becoming nurse practitioners, with flexible formats designed for working professionals. If you are passionate about wellness and preventive care, a nutrition degree online can lead to opportunities in dietetics, clinical nutrition, or health education, where demand continues to grow.

When considering any healthcare administration program, it’s critical to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Accreditation, curriculum quality, faculty expertise, and graduate outcomes are all key factors to ensure your degree will be respected and valuable in the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Yasuo Tano

Recently Published Articles