World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
5501
World Ranking
9284
National Ranking
3330

William J. Teague publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Teague sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 143 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

William J. Teague D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Teague sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Teague is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their primary research area lies within Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a specialized focus on Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their scholarly contributions encompass a diverse range of oceanographic and atmospheric topics, including:

  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Marine and Fisheries Research
  • Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics

Teague has published multiple articles in a variety of scientific journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Oceanography
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Representative recent publications include:

  • "Observations of Flow Separation and Mixing around the Northern Palau Island/Ridge" (2020) in Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • "Observations of Eddy-Modulated Turbulent Mixing in the Southern Bay of Bengal" (2021) in Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • "Tidally Driven Mixing "Hot Spot" at the Entrance of the Japan/East Sea" (2022) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Intraseasonal Variability of Upper-Ocean Heat Fluxes in the Central Bay of Bengal" (2021) in Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • "Current observations on and around a deep-ocean island/reef: northern Palau and Velasco Reef" (2022) in Journal of Oceanography

William J. Teague frequently collaborates with various researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • H. W. Wijesekera
  • David W. Wang
  • Conrad A. Luecke
  • Ewa Jarosz
  • Zachariah R. Hallock

The body of work demonstrates a focus on ocean mixing processes, heat flux variability, and observational studies around island and reef environments. The research integrates multidisciplinary approaches to investigate oceanographic and atmospheric phenomena relevant to marine ecosystems and climate variability.

Best Publications

  • A Comparison Between the Generalized Digital Environmental Model and Levitus climatologies

    William J. Teague;Michael J. Carron;Patrick J. Hogan

  • The Modular Ocean Data Assimilation System (MODAS)

    D. N. Fox;W. J. Teague;C. N. Barron;M. R. Carnes

  • Decade-scale trans-Pacific propagation and warming effects of an El Niño anomaly

    G. A. Jacobs;H. E. Hurlburt;J. C. Kindle;E. J. Metzger

  • Bottom-up determination of air-sea momentum exchange under a major tropical cyclone

    Ewa Jarosz;Douglas A. Mitchell;David W. Wang;William J. Teague

  • Circulation and currents in the southwestern East/Japan Sea: Overview and review

    K.-I. Chang;W.J. Teague;S.J. Lyu;H.T. Perkins

  • A statistical comparison of wind speed, wave height, and wave period derived from satellite altimeters and ocean buoys in the Gulf of Mexico region

    Paul A. Hwang;William J. Teague;Gregg A. Jacobs;David W. Wang

  • Low-Frequency Current Observations in the Korea/Tsushima Strait

    W. J. Teague;G. A. Jacobs;H. T. Perkins;J. W. Book

  • Extreme Waves Under Hurricane Ivan

    David W. Wang;Douglas A. Mitchell;William J. Teague;Ewa Jarosz

  • Connectivity of the Taiwan, Cheju, and Korea straits

    W.J. Teague;G.A. Jacobs;D.S. Ko;T.Y. Tang

  • Monthly Variations of Water Masses in the Yellow and East China Seas, November 6, 1998

    H. B. Hur;G. A. Jacobs;W. J. Teague

  • Current observations on the development of the Yellow Sea Warm Current

    W. J. Teague;G. A. Jacobs

  • Observations of Kuroshio flow variations in the East China Sea

    Magdalena Andres;M Wimbush;J H Park;K I Chang

  • Inference of Subsurface Thermohaline Structure from Fields Measurable by Satellite

    Michael R. Carnes;William J. Teague;Jim L. Mitchell

  • Observed Oceanic Response over the Upper Continental Slope and Outer Shelf during Hurricane Ivan

    William J. Teague;Ewa Jarosz;David W. Wang;Douglas A. Mitchell

  • Upper Circulation Patterns in the Ulleung Basin

    D.A. Mitchell;D.R. Watts;M. Wimbush;W.J. Teague

  • On Flow Variability in the Bosphorus Strait

    Ewa Jarosz;William J. Teague;Jeffrey W. Book;Şükrü Beşiktepe

  • Current and tide observations in the southern Yellow Sea

    W. J. Teague;H. T. Perkins;Z. R. Hallock;G. A. Jacobs

  • Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis of an Ocean Model Response to Hurricane Ivan

    G. R. Halliwell;Lynn K. Shay;J. K. Brewster;William J. Teague

  • ASIRI: An Ocean–Atmosphere Initiative for Bay of Bengal

    Hemantha W. Wijesekera;Emily Shroyer;Amit Tandon;M. Ravichandran

  • Transport variability across the Korea/Tsushima Strait and the Tsushima Island wake

    William J. Teague;Paul A. Hwang;Gregg A. Jacobs;Jeffrey W. Book

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Hwang
Paul A. Hwang United States Naval Research Laboratory
Luca Centurioni
Luca Centurioni University of California, San Diego
Alan M. Shiller
Alan M. Shiller University of Southern Mississippi
Kuh Kim
Kuh Kim Seoul National University
D. Randolph Watts
D. Randolph Watts University of Rhode Island
Craig M. Lee
Craig M. Lee University of Washington
Patrick J. Hogan
Patrick J. Hogan United States Naval Research Laboratory
James N. Moum
James N. Moum Oregon State University
Harley E. Hurlburt
Harley E. Hurlburt United States Naval Research Laboratory
Daniel L. Rudnick
Daniel L. Rudnick Scripps Institution of Oceanography

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, often complemented by degrees in related fields. For professionals interested in public administration within environmental policy, exploring the easiest online MPA programs can provide flexible, accelerated education options.

For those looking at the societal impacts of environmental issues, pursuing an online bachelors degree programs in sociology offers valuable insights into human-environment interactions and community dynamics.

Advanced educators or researchers in environmental studies might consider doctoral options that streamline their path, such as a doctorate degree online no dissertation, minimizing traditional hurdles and focusing on applied research.

For educators aiming to deepen their expertise, transitioning through an EdS to EdD program provides structured advancement from specialist to doctoral levels, often with online flexibility.

These interdisciplinary and advanced degree pathways enhance one's ability to impact environmental science careers across education, policy, and social sectors.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Teague

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles