World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William H. Starbuck

William H. Starbuck

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
16672
World Ranking
3497
National Ranking
1684

William H. Starbuck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Starbuck sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 170 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

William H. Starbuck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Starbuck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management

Overview

William H. Starbuck is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. The research focuses primarily on topics related to scientometrics and bibliometrics research, management and organizational studies, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, scientific computing and data management, accounting education and careers, advanced radiotherapy techniques, and radiation therapy and dosimetry.

William H. Starbuck has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • "Oh Grandmother, what big teeth you have!" Incentives to spur scientific research at business schools have been treacherous, 2024, Scandinavian Journal of Management
  • How replication studies can improve doctoral student education, 2023, Journal of Management Scientific Reports
  • Biologically Equivalent Dose Comparison Between Magnetic Resonance-Guided Adaptive and Computed Tomography-Guided Internal Target Volume-Based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Liver Tumors, 2023, Cureus
  • How Muriel's Tea Stained Management Research Through Statistical Significance Tests, 2024, Journal of Management Inquiry
  • PP20.14 SCRIPTING AUTOPLANNING APPROACH FOR EARLY-STAGE PROSTATE CANCERVMAT PLANNING UNDER RTOG 415 RECOMMENDATIONS IN MONACO, 2024, Physica Medica

Frequent co-authors of William H. Starbuck include:

  • Andreas Schwab
  • David Krackhardt
  • Gerard P. Hodgkinson
  • Herman Aguinis
  • Peter Bamberger

Publication venues where William H. Starbuck has frequently appeared include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management Scientific Reports
  • Scandinavian Journal of Management
  • Cureus
  • Journal of Management Inquiry

The main subfields of study in William H. Starbuck's research are:

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Accounting
  • Radiation

William H. Starbuck has been recognized as a Fellow of the British Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • LEARNING BY KNOWLEDGE‐INTENSIVE FIRMS*

    William H. Starbuck

  • Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization

    Bo L. T. Hedberg;Paul C. Bystrom;William H. Starbuck

  • To avoid organizational crises, unlearn

    Paul C. Nystrom;William H. Starbuck

  • ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTION GENERATORS

    William H. Starbuck

  • Executives’ Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense

    William H. Starbuck;William H. Starbuck;Frances J. Milliken

  • CHALLENGER: FINE-TUNING THE ODDS UNTIL SOMETHING BREAKS

    William H. Starbuck;Frances J. Milliken

  • How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication

    William H. Starbuck

  • Learning from failures: Why it May Not Happen

    Philippe Baumard;William H. Starbuck

  • Studying the Accuracy of Managers' Perceptions: A Research Odyssey

    John M. Mezias;William H. Starbuck

  • CONGEALING OIL: INVENTING IDEOLOGIES TO JUSTIFY ACTING IDEOLOGIES OUT

    William H. Starbuck

  • Organization at the limit : lessons from the Columbia disaster

    William H. Starbuck;Moshe Farjoun

  • The production of knowledge : the challenge of social science research

    William H. Starbuck

  • KEEPING A BUTTERFLY AND AN ELEPHANT IN A HOUSE OF CARDS: THE ELEMENTS OF EXCEPTIONAL SUCCESS*

    William H. Starbuck

  • Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization

    Bo L. T. Hedberg;Paul C. Nystrom;William H. Starbuck;William H. Starbuck

  • Unlearning ineffective or obsolete technologies

    William H. Starbuck

  • Opening Pandora's box: studying the accuracy of managers' perceptions

    William H. Starbuck;John M. Mezias

  • Responding to Crises

    William H. Starbuck;William H. Starbuck;Arent Greve;Bo Hedberg

  • Learning to Design Organizations and Learning from Designing Them

    Roger L. M. Dunbar;William H. Starbuck

  • Turning Lemons into Lemonade Where Is the Value in Peer Reviews

    William H. Starbuck

  • The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making

    Gerard P. Hodgkinson;William H. Starbuck

  • Level of aspiration.

    William H. Starbuck

Frequent Co-Authors

Cary L. Cooper
Cary L. Cooper University of Manchester
Michael L. Barnett
Michael L. Barnett Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Frances J. Milliken
Frances J. Milliken New York University
Stewart Clegg
Stewart Clegg University of Sydney
Yehuda Baruch
Yehuda Baruch University of Southampton
Violina P. Rindova
Violina P. Rindova University of California, Irvine
Gerard P. Hodgkinson
Gerard P. Hodgkinson University of Manchester
Alison M. Konrad
Alison M. Konrad University of Western Ontario
Dean Tjosvold
Dean Tjosvold Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and flexible learning opportunities. Many students consider cost as a key factor, especially in high-demand fields such as psychology. If you’re planning to pursue graduate studies, understanding how much does a masters in psychology cost can help you budget effectively and choose an affordable path.

For working professionals aiming to advance quickly, accelerated online degree programs offer condensed schedules that can lead to a qualification in less time. These programs are ideal for learners eager to enter the job market or change careers swiftly.

Individuals interested in educational leadership may consider edd programs online, which provide flexible options for earning an advanced degree while balancing other commitments. Similarly, finishing your graduate studies in a shorter timeframe is possible with the online masters degree options designed for rapid completion.

Whether your goal is to enhance your credentials or pivot your career, online and accelerated programs offer convenient pathways to success in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Starbuck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles