World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
12384
World Ranking
9821
National Ranking
4304

Ulrich Steidl publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Steidl sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 303 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ulrich Steidl D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Steidl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Steidl is affiliated with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the United States. Their research contributions span the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on several subfields including molecular biology, hematology, immunology, oncology, and genetics.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

Ulrich Steidl has published extensively in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Blood
  • Experimental Hematology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Nature Cancer

Among their recent papers are the following notable works:

  • "Phase 1 Trial of ALRN-6924, a Dual Inhibitor of MDMX and MDM2, in Patients with Solid Tumors and Lymphomas Bearing Wild-type TP53" (2021) published in Clinical Cancer Research
  • "A small-molecule allosteric inhibitor of BAX protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy" (2020) in Nature Cancer
  • "Delayed clearance of SARS-CoV2 in male compared to female patients: High ACE2 expression in testes suggests possible existence of gender-specific viral reservoirs" (2020) in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Single-molecule imaging of transcription dynamics in somatic stem cells" (2020) in Nature
  • "H1 linker histones silence repetitive elements by promoting both histone H3K9 methylation and chromatin compaction" (2020) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Ulrich Steidl has collaborated frequently with a set of coauthors, including:

  • Aditi Shastri
  • Kith Pradhan
  • Amit Verma
  • Kira Gritsman
  • Mendel Goldfinger

Best Publications

  • MHC class II transactivator CIITA is a recurrent gene fusion partner in lymphoid cancers

    Christian Steidl;Sohrab P. Shah;Bruce W. Woolcock;Lixin Rui

  • Chronic interleukin-1 exposure drives haematopoietic stem cells towards precocious myeloid differentiation at the expense of self-renewal

    Eric M. Pietras;Cristina Mirantes-Barbeito;Sarah Fong;Dirk Loeffler

  • Lymphoid cell growth and transformation are suppressed by a key regulatory element of the gene encoding PU.1

    Frank Rosenbauer;Frank Rosenbauer;Bronwyn M. Owens;Li Yu;Joseph R. Tumang

  • Stem and progenitor cells in myelodysplastic syndromes show aberrant stage-specific expansion and harbor genetic and epigenetic alterations.

    Britta Will;Li Zhou;Thomas O. Vogler;Susanna Ben-Neriah

  • Deregulation of innate immune and inflammatory signaling in myelodysplastic syndromes.

    I Gañán-Gómez;Y Wei;D T Starczynowski;S Colla

  • Mutational cooperativity linked to combinatorial epigenetic gain of function in acute myeloid leukemia.

    Alan H. Shih;Yanwen Jiang;Cem Meydan;Kaitlyn Shank

  • Overexpression of IL-1 receptor accessory protein in stem and progenitor cells and outcome correlation in AML and MDS.

    Laura Barreyro;Britta Will;Boris Bartholdy;Li Zhou

  • Dual inhibition of MDMX and MDM2 as a therapeutic strategy in leukemia

    Luis A. Carvajal;Daniela Ben Neriah;Adrien Senecal;Lumie Benard

  • Gene expression profiling identifies significant differences between the molecular phenotypes of bone marrow-derived and circulating human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells.

    Ulrich Steidl;Ralf Kronenwett;Ralf Kronenwett;Ulrich Peter Rohr;Ulrich Peter Rohr;Roland Fenk;Roland Fenk

  • U2AF1 mutations induce oncogenic IRAK4 isoforms and activate innate immune pathways in myeloid malignancies.

    Molly A. Smith;Molly A. Smith;Gaurav S. Choudhary;Andrea Pellagatti;Kwangmin Choi

  • PU.1 expression is modulated by the balance of functional sense and antisense RNAs regulated by a shared cis-regulatory element

    Alexander K. Ebralidze;Florence C. Guibal;Ulrich Steidl;Pu Zhang

  • Essential role of Jun family transcription factors in PU.1 knockdown-induced leukemic stem cells

    Ulrich Steidl;Frank Rosenbauer;Frank Rosenbauer;Roel G W Verhaak;Xuesong Gu

  • Myelodysplastic syndrome progression to acute myeloid leukemia at the stem cell level.

    Jiahao Chen;Yun Ruei Kao;Daqian Sun;Tihomira I. Todorova

  • Fast and reliable titration of recombinant adeno-associated virus type-2 using quantitative real-time PCR.

    Ulrich Peter Rohr;Marc Andre Wulf;Susanne Stahn;Ulrich Steidl

  • IL8-CXCR2 pathway inhibition as a therapeutic strategy against MDS and AML stem cells

    Carolina Schinke;Orsolya Giricz;Weijuan Li;Aditi Shastri

  • A theoretical approach to select effective antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides at high statistical probability

    Volker Patzel;Ulrich Steidl;Ralf Kronenwett;Rainer Haas

  • New IDH1 mutant inhibitors for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

    Ujunwa C. Okoye-Okafor;Boris Bartholdy;Jessy Cartier;Enoch N. Gao

  • Transcriptional profiling identifies cyclin D1 as a critical downstream effector of mutant epidermal growth factor receptor signaling.

    Susumu Kobayashi;Takeshi Shimamura;Stefano Monti;Ulrich Steidl

  • Primary human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells express functionally active receptors of neuromediators.

    Ulrich Steidl;Simone Bork;Sebastian Schaub;Oliver Selbach

  • Eltrombopag inhibits the proliferation of leukemia cells via reduction of intracellular iron and induction of differentiation

    Michael Roth;Michael Roth;Britta Will;Guillermo Simkin;Swathi Narayanagari

Frequent Co-Authors

Amit Verma
Amit Verma Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Andrea Pellagatti
Andrea Pellagatti University of Oxford
Amittha Wickrema
Amittha Wickrema University of Chicago
John M. Greally
John M. Greally Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Daniel G. Tenen
Daniel G. Tenen National University of Singapore
Christian Steidl
Christian Steidl University of British Columbia
Ari Melnick
Ari Melnick Cornell University
Ross L. Levine
Ross L. Levine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Alan F. List
Alan F. List Precision BioSciences
Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski
Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens up various online degree and career opportunities in the healthcare sector. Related fields such as health information management and medical coding are in demand, offering strong job stability and growth.

An increasingly popular degree option is the health information management degree online, ideal for those interested in the administrative side of healthcare. With this credential, graduates can pursue roles that bridge biological knowledge and data management.

Certification is another major aspect, especially for those aspiring to work as medical coders. Understanding the differences between certified coding specialist (ccs) and other credentials helps tailor your career path to specialized clinical coding areas.

Careers in coding and billing also prompt questions about potential income and job satisfaction. To learn more about how much do medical coders make, it’s helpful to review salary trends, typical qualifications, and industry demand.

If you’re wondering is medical billing and coding a good career, consider factors like flexibility, work-from-home options, and the ability to leverage your biology or biochemistry background in a fast-growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Steidl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles