World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
7886
World Ranking
7624
National Ranking
577

Ulrich Salzmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Salzmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 181 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ulrich Salzmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Salzmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Salzmann is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom and has a substantial publication record in Earth and Planetary Sciences, as well as Environmental Science. Their research encompasses various subfields including Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, and Forestry.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics with a focus on Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Evolution and Paleontology Studies, Plant Diversity and Evolution, Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils, Climate variability and models, Pasture and Agricultural Systems, and Cryospheric studies and observations.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Climate of the past
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature Communications
  • Communications Earth & Environment

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Ulrich Salzmann are:

  • The Eocene-Oligocene transition: a review of marine and terrestrial proxy data, models and model-data comparisons (2021) - Climate of the past
  • Temperate rainforests near the South Pole during peak Cretaceous warmth (2020) - Nature
  • Alpine permafrost could account for a quarter of thawed carbon based on Plio-Pleistocene paleoclimate analogue (2022) - Nature Communications
  • Safeguarding Imperiled Biodiversity and Evolutionary Processes in the Wallacea Center of Endemism (2022) - PubMed
  • Vegetation change across the Drake Passage region linked to late Eocene cooling and glacial disturbance after the Eocene-Oligocene transition (2022) - Climate of the past

Ulrich Salzmann collaborates regularly with multiple researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Nick Thompson
  • Daniel J. Lunt
  • Matthew J. Pound
  • Michael Amoo
  • Alan M. Haywood

Best Publications

  • Large-scale features of Pliocene climate: results from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project

    Alan Haywood;Daniel Hill;Daniel Hill;Aisling Dolan;Bette Otto-Bliesner

  • Global vegetation dynamics and latitudinal temperature gradients during the mid to Late Miocene (15.97-5.33 Ma)

    Matthew J. Pound;Matthew J. Pound;Matthew J. Pound;Alan M. Haywood;Ulrich Salzmann;James B. Riding

  • A new global biome reconstruction and data-model comparison for the Middle Pliocene

    Ulrich Salzmann;Alan Haywood;Daniel Lunt;Daniel Lunt;Paul Valdes

  • The Dahomey Gap: an abrupt climatically induced rain forest fragmentation in West Africa during the late Holocene.

    Ulrich Salzmann;Philipp Hoelzmann

  • Earth system sensitivity inferred from Pliocene modelling and data

    Daniel J. Lunt;Daniel J. Lunt;Alan M. Haywood;Gavin A. Schmidt;Ulrich Salzmann;Ulrich Salzmann

  • The PRISM3D paleoenvironmental reconstruction

    Harry Dowsett;Marci Robinson;Alan Haywood;Ulrich Salzmann

  • The PRISM4 (mid-Piacenzian) paleoenvironmental reconstruction

    Harry J. Dowsett;Aisling M. Dolan;David Rowley;Robert Moucha

  • A global synthesis of the marine and terrestrial evidence for glaciation during the Pliocene Epoch

    Stijn De Schepper;Philip L. Gibbard;Ulrich Salzmann;Jürgen Ehlers

  • The Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) Phase 2: scientific objectives and experimental design

    Alan M. Haywood;Harry J. Dowsett;Aisling M. Dolan;David Rowley

  • The DeepMIP contribution to PMIP4: methodologies for selection, compilation and analysis of latest Paleocene and early Eocene climate proxy data, incorporating version 0.1 of the DeepMIP database

    Christopher J Hollis;Tom Dunkley Jones;Eleni Anagnostou;Eleni Anagnostou;Peter K Bijl

  • The Eocene–Oligocene transition: a review of marine and terrestrial proxy data, models and model–data comparisons

    David K. Hutchinson;Helen K. Coxall;Daniel J. Lunt;Margret Steinthorsdottir;Margret Steinthorsdottir

  • Climate and environment of a Pliocene warm world

    Ulrich Salzmann;Mark Williams;Mark Williams;Alan M. Haywood;Andrew L.A. Johnson

  • A Tortonian (Late Miocene, 11.61–7.25Ma) global vegetation reconstruction

    Matthew J. Pound;Matthew J. Pound;Alan M. Haywood;Ulrich Salzmann;James B. Riding

  • Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP): experimental design and boundary conditions (Experiment 1)

    Alan Haywood;Harry Dowsett;Bette Otto-Bliesner;Mark Chandler;Mark Chandler

  • Palaeoenvironmental changes in the arid and sub arid belt (Sahara-Sahel-Arabian Peninsula) from 150 kyr to present

    Philipp Hoelzmann;Françoise Gasse;Lydie M. Dupont;Ulrich Salzmann

  • Sea Surface Temperature of the mid-Piacenzian Ocean: A Data-Model Comparison

    Harry J. Dowsett;Kevin M. Foley;Danielle K. Stoll;Mark A. Chandler

  • Challenges in quantifying Pliocene terrestrial warming revealed by data–model discord

    Ulrich Salzmann;Aisling M. Dolan;Alan M. Haywood;Wing-Le Chan

  • Heterogeneity in global vegetation and terrestrial climate change during the late Eocene to early Oligocene transition.

    Matthew J. Pound;Ulrich Salzmann

  • On the causes of mid-Pliocene warmth and polar amplification

    Daniel J. Lunt;Alan M. Haywood;Gavin A. Schmidt;Ulrich Salzmann

  • Southern Ocean warming and Wilkes Land ice sheet retreat during the mid-Miocene

    Francesca Sangiorgi;Peter K. Bijl;Sandra Passchier;Ulrich Salzmann

  • The DeepMIP contribution to PMIP4: experimental design for model simulations of the EECO, PETM, and pre-PETM (version 1.0)

    Daniel J. Lunt;Matthew Huber;Eleni Anagnostou;Michiel L. J. Baatsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan M. Haywood
Alan M. Haywood University of Leeds
Daniel J. Lunt
Daniel J. Lunt University of Bristol
Karsten Gohl
Karsten Gohl Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Harry J. Dowsett
Harry J. Dowsett United States Geological Survey
Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand
Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand British Antarctic Survey
Gabriele Uenzelmann-Neben
Gabriele Uenzelmann-Neben Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Gerrit Lohmann
Gerrit Lohmann University of Bremen
Gerhard Kuhn
Gerhard Kuhn University of Bremen
Robert D Larter
Robert D Larter British Antarctic Survey
Werner Ehrmann
Werner Ehrmann Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Many students seek programs that balance quality with affordability; options like low cost online general studies degree offerings can provide a flexible and budget-friendly foundation for further specialization.

Additionally, individuals looking to make a smooth transition into environmental fields might consider some of the easiest bachelors degree programs. These allow for quicker completion times while still covering essential concepts applicable across environmental careers.

Specialized disciplines such as geology also play a critical role in understanding environmental systems. Numerous reputable geology degrees online offer in-depth study of earth processes, resource management, and sustainability — all crucial elements in environmental science careers.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), vital for environmental data analysis and mapping. The best gis programs in the us provide cutting-edge training in spatial technologies that help shape policy and conservation efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Salzmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles