World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Mark A. Chandler publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Chandler sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Mark A. Chandler D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Chandler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of climate forcings

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;L. Nazarenko

  • Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates.

    Kevin Burke;John Williams;Mark Chandler;Alan Haywood

  • Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;P. Kharecha

  • Large-scale features of Pliocene climate: results from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project

    Alan Haywood;Daniel Hill;Daniel Hill;Aisling Dolan;Bette Otto-Bliesner

  • The PRISM4 (mid-Piacenzian) paleoenvironmental reconstruction

    Harry J. Dowsett;Aisling M. Dolan;David Rowley;Robert Moucha

  • The Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) Phase 2: scientific objectives and experimental design

    Alan M. Haywood;Harry J. Dowsett;Aisling M. Dolan;David Rowley

  • Increased ocean heat transports and warmer climate

    D. Rind;M. Chandler

  • Pangaean climate during the Early Jurassic: GCM simulations and the sedimentary record of paleoclimate

    Mark A. Chandler;David Rind;Reto Ruedy

  • Assessing confidence in Pliocene sea surface temperatures to evaluate predictive models

    Harry J. Dowsett;Marci M. Robinson;Alan M. Haywood;Daniel J. Hill;Daniel J. Hill

  • The Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: large-scale climate features and climate sensitivity

    Alan M. Haywood;Julia C. Tindall;Harry J. Dowsett;Aisling M. Dolan

  • Mid-Pliocene sea level and continental ice volume based on coupled benthic Mg/Ca palaeotemperatures and oxygen isotopes.

    Gary S Dwyer;Mark A Chandler

  • Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP): experimental design and boundary conditions (Experiment 1)

    Alan Haywood;Harry Dowsett;Bette Otto-Bliesner;Mark Chandler;Mark Chandler

  • Joint investigations of the middle Pliocene climate II: GISS GCM Northern Hemisphere results

    Mark Chandler;David Rind;Robert Thompson

  • Sea Surface Temperature of the mid-Piacenzian Ocean: A Data-Model Comparison

    Harry J. Dowsett;Kevin M. Foley;Danielle K. Stoll;Mark A. Chandler

  • Challenges in quantifying Pliocene terrestrial warming revealed by data–model discord

    Ulrich Salzmann;Aisling M. Dolan;Alan M. Haywood;Wing-Le Chan

  • Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP): experimental design and boundary conditions (Experiment 2)

    A.M. Haywood;Harry J. Dowsett;Marci M. Robinson;Danielle K. Stoll

  • Climate forcings and the initiation of low-latitude ice sheets during the Neoproterozoic Varanger glacial interval

    Unknown

  • Resolving Orbital and Climate Keys of Earth and Extraterrestrial Environments with Dynamics (ROCKE-3D) 1.0: A General Circulation Model for Simulating the Climates of Rocky Planets

    Michael J. Way;Michael J. Way;I. Aleinov;I. Aleinov;David S. Amundsen;David S. Amundsen;M. A. Chandler;M. A. Chandler

  • Effects of stratigraphic heterogeneity on permeability in eolian sandstone sequence, Page Sandstone, northern Arizona

    Mark A. Chandler;Gary Kocurek;David J. Goggin;Larry W. Lake

  • Patterns of Permeability in Eolian Deposits: Page Sandstone (Jurassic), Northeastern Arizona

    D.J. Goggin;M.A. Chandler;G. Kocurek;L.W. Lake

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhongshi Zhang
Zhongshi Zhang NORCE Research
Ayako Abe-Ouchi
Ayako Abe-Ouchi University of Tokyo
Alan M. Haywood
Alan M. Haywood University of Leeds
Daniel J. Lunt
Daniel J. Lunt University of Bristol
Harry J. Dowsett
Harry J. Dowsett United States Geological Survey
Gerrit Lohmann
Gerrit Lohmann University of Bremen
Daniel J. Hill
Daniel J. Hill University of Leeds
David Rind
David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Aisling M. Dolan
Aisling M. Dolan University of Leeds
Nan Rosenbloom
Nan Rosenbloom National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career paths. For those interested in information management and research, exploring online mlis programs accredited ala can provide valuable skills in library and information science. These programs are designed to meet professional standards while offering the flexibility of online learning.

Additionally, many students pursue a library science masters degree to deepen their expertise in organizing and preserving scientific data, which is crucial in Earth Science research. This advanced education equips graduates for diverse roles in libraries, archives, and digital resource centers.

Creative professionals interested in visual documentation of Earth phenomena may consider online photography degrees. These affordable programs teach essential skills in digital imaging and photography, which are invaluable for environmental monitoring and public outreach.

Veterans looking to transition to Earth Science-related careers can benefit from specific support and tailored curricula. Exploring the best online photography degree programs for veterans ensures they receive quality education with resources aimed at their unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Chandler

Recently Published Articles