World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
25055
World Ranking
16099
National Ranking
8101

Thomas Krausz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Krausz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 297 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas Krausz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Krausz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Krausz is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a specific emphasis on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, surgery, infectious diseases, and cancer research. The main topics explored in their work include occupational and environmental lung diseases, pleural and pulmonary diseases, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, colorectal and anal carcinomas, cancer genomics and diagnostics, CAR-T cell therapy research, and immunotherapy and immune responses.

They have contributed to several publications, particularly in notable academic journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • American Journal of Clinical Pathology
  • Cancer Discovery

Thomas Krausz has collaborated regularly with a number of coauthors including Aliya N. Husain, David B. Chapel, Jefree J. Schulte, Richard Attanoos, and Luka Brčić.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Significance of BAP1 Mutations in Human Cancer, 2020, Cancer Discovery
  • Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab Following Anti-PD-1/L1 Failure in Melanoma, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Application of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis and management of malignant mesothelioma, 2020, Translational Lung Cancer Research
  • Medical and Surgical Care of Patients With Mesothelioma and Their Relatives Carrying Germline BAP1 Mutations, 2022, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Improved Survival Associated with Local Tumor Response Following Multisite Radiotherapy and Pembrolizumab: Secondary Analysis of a Phase I Trial, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research

Their work intersects clinical cancer research, immunotherapy, and surgical care for thoracic and pulmonary diseases, contributing to the understanding of cancer mechanisms and treatment responses, particularly in mesothelioma and melanoma.

Best Publications

  • Coordinated Induction by IL15 of a TCR-Independent NKG2D Signaling Pathway Converts CTL into Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cells in Celiac Disease

    Bertrand Meresse;Zhangguo Chen;Cezary Ciszewski;Maria Tretiakova

  • C-Reactive Protein and Complement Are Important Mediators of Tissue Damage in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    M. Griselli;J. Herbert;W.L. Hutchinson;K.M. Taylor

  • BAP1 and cancer

    Michele Carbone;Haining Yang;Harvey I. Pass;Thomas Krausz

  • Intratumor depletion of CD4+ cells unmasks tumor immunogenicity leading to the rejection of late-stage tumors

    Ping Yu;Youjin Lee;Wenhua Liu;Thomas Krausz

  • Levels of Matrix Metalloproteases in Bladder Cancer Correlate with Tumor Grade and Invasion

    Bernard Davies;Jonathan Waxman;Harpret Wasan;Paul Abel

  • "Proximal-type" epithelioid sarcoma, a distinctive aggressive neoplasm showing rhabdoid features. Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of a series

    Louis Guillou;Catherine Wadden;Jean-Michel Coindre;Thomas Krausz

  • Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma: 2017 Update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group

    Aliya Noor Husain;Thomas V. Colby;Nelson G. Ordóñez;Timothy Craig Allen

  • Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: 2012 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.

    Aliya N. Husain;Thomas Colby;Nelson Ordonez;Thomas Krausz

  • Genetic requirements for Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation and persistence in host tissues

    Alice G. Cheng;Hwan Keun Kim;Monica L. Burts;Thomas Krausz

  • Novel YAP1-TFE3 fusion defines a distinct subset of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

    Cristina R. Antonescu;Francois Le Loarer;Juan-Miguel Mosquera;Andrea Sboner

  • Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue using dimethylsulphoxide and propanediol-sucrose as cryoprotectants

    Outi Hovatta;Rene Silye;Thomas Krausz;Ronit Abir

  • Glucose utilization in vivo by human pulmonary neoplasms.

    Keith B. Nolop;Christopher G. Rhodes;Lars H. Brudin;Ronald P. Beaney

  • Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: a consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.

    Aliya N. Husain;Thomas V. Colby;Nelson G. Ordóñez;Thomas Krausz

  • Extracellular matrix improves survival of both stored and fresh human primordial and primary ovarian follicles in long-term culture.

    O. Hovatta;R. Silye;R. Abir;T. Krausz

  • HPV testing in primary screening of older women.

    J Cuzick;E Beverley;L Ho;G Terry

  • BAP1 cancer syndrome: malignant mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, and MBAITs.

    Michele Carbone;Michele Carbone;Laura Korb Ferris;Francine Baumann;Andrea Napolitano

  • Expression and Mutational Analysis of MET in Human Solid Cancers

    Patrick C. Ma;Maria S. Tretiakova;Alexander C. MacKinnon;Nithya Ramnath

  • Renal medullary carcinoma: rhabdoid features and the absence of INI1 expression as markers of aggressive behavior

    Jason X Cheng;Maria Tretiakova;Can Gong;Saptarshi Mandal

  • Differential diagnosis of cardiac masses using contrast echocardiographic perfusion imaging.

    James N. Kirkpatrick;Tiffany Wong;James E. Bednarz;Kirk T. Spencer

  • Programmed necrosis induced by asbestos in human mesothelial cells causes high-mobility group box 1 protein release and resultant inflammation

    Haining Yang;Zeyana Rivera;Sandro Jube;Masaki Nasu

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher D.M. Fletcher
Christopher D.M. Fletcher Brigham and Women's Hospital
Theodore Karrison
Theodore Karrison University of Chicago
Ravi Salgia
Ravi Salgia City Of Hope National Medical Center
Michele Carbone
Michele Carbone University of Hawaii at Manoa
Ernst Lengyel
Ernst Lengyel University of Chicago
Harvey I. Pass
Harvey I. Pass New York University
Andrew Churg
Andrew Churg University of British Columbia
Christopher Haslett
Christopher Haslett University of Edinburgh
Jason J. Luke
Jason J. Luke University of Pittsburgh
Shiranee Sriskandan
Shiranee Sriskandan Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine in the USA doesn't always mean following the traditional MD route. Many students consider online learning options within the healthcare field for flexibility and affordability. For those aiming to become registered nurses, the cheapest online bsn programs can be a practical choice, making nursing education accessible without a heavy financial burden.

Licensed RNs looking to advance can explore an rn to bsn online pathway, which helps bridge the educational gap and opens doors to greater responsibilities and higher pay. For those interested in leadership or academic roles, doctorate in nursing education online programs offer advanced training, supporting a transition into teaching, administration, or research.

Even those without a prior nursing background can shift into healthcare by considering online msn programs for non nurses. This option provides a fast track into nursing at the master’s level, enabling career changers to join the field efficiently. Exploring these alternative pathways can help you find the right fit for your healthcare career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Krausz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles