World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
4769
World Ranking
9440
National Ranking
123

Svetlana Tsyro publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Svetlana Tsyro sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Svetlana Tsyro D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Svetlana Tsyro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Svetlana Tsyro is affiliated with the Norwegian Meteorological Institute in Norway and has contributed substantially to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research focuses primarily on atmospheric science, with particular emphasis on atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, global and planetary change, and related environmental dynamics.

The scientist's work spans several subfields including atmospheric science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, automotive engineering, and environmental engineering. This diversity reflects a comprehensive approach to understanding atmospheric processes and their effects on climate and health.

Their main topics of research coverage include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Air quality and health impacts
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • COVID-19 impact on air quality

Svetlana Tsyro's recent publications demonstrate collaboration within the atmospheric science community, with frequent co-authors including Michael Gauss, Kostas Tsigaridis, Jesper Heile Christensen, Joakim Langner, and Cynthia Whaley.

Significant recent papers include:

  • "AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations" (2021), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Estimating lockdown-induced European NO 2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models" (2021), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III" (2021), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study" (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Clean air policies are key for successfully mitigating Arctic warming" (2022), published in Communications Earth & Environment

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, which has published ten of their papers. They have also published in Communications Earth & Environment, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Geophysical Research Letters, and Aerosol and Air Quality Research.

Best Publications

  • The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model -- technical description

    David Simpson;David Simpson;Anna Benedictow;Halldis Berge;Robert Bergström;Robert Bergström

  • Global and Regional Trends of Atmospheric Sulfur

    Wenche Aas;Augustin Mortier;Van C. Bowersox;Ribu Cherian

  • AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations

    Jonas Gliß;Augustin Mortier;Michael Schulz;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment

    Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian;Mian Chin;Didier A. Hauglustaine;Michael Schulz

  • Presentation of the EURODELTA III intercomparison exercise-evaluation of the chemistry transport models' performance on criteria pollutants and joint analysis with meteorology

    Bertrand Bessagnet;Guido Pirovano;Mihaela Mircea;Cornelius Cuvelier

  • Multi-model simulations of aerosol and ozone radiative forcing due to anthropogenic emission changes during the period 1990-2015

    Gunnar Myhre;Wenche Aas;Ribu Cherian;W Collins

  • To what extent can aerosol water explain the discrepancy between model calculated and gravimetric PM 10 and PM 2.5

    S. G. Tsyro

  • On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations

    Nick Schutgens;Nick Schutgens;Svetlana Tsyro;Edward Gryspeerdt;Edward Gryspeerdt;Daisuke Goto

  • Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling

    Nick A. J. Schutgens;Edward Gryspeerdt;Natalie Weigum;Svetlana Tsyro

  • Modelling of sea salt concentrations over Europe: key uncertainties and comparison with observations

    S Tsyro;Wenche Aas;Joana Soares;M Sofiev

  • Nitrogen deposition in Spain: Modeled patterns and threatened habitats within the Natura 2000 network

    H. García-Gómez;J.L. Garrido;M.G. Vivanco;L. Lassaletta

  • Estimating lockdown-induced European NO 2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models

    Jérôme Barré;Hervé Petetin;Augustin Colette;Marc Guevara

  • Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components

    Hilde Fagerli;Svetlana Tsyro;Jan Eiof Jonson;Ágnes Nyíri

  • Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III

    Maria Sand;Bjørn H. Samset;Gunnar Myhre;Jonas Gliß

  • Lessons learnt from the first EMEP intensive measurement periods

    Wenche Aas;Svetlana Tsyro;Elke Bieber;Robert Bergström;Robert Bergström

  • Modeling of elemental carbon over Europe

    S. Tsyro;D. Simpson;L. Tarrason;Z. Klimont

  • A multi-model comparison of meteorological drivers of surface ozone over Europe

    Noelia Otero;Jana Sillmann;Kathleen Mar;Henning W. Rust

  • Can further mitigation of ammonia emissions reduce exceedances of particulate matter air quality standards

    Bertrand Bessagnet;Maxime Beauchamp;Cristina Guerreiro;Frank de Leeuw

  • An evaluation of European nitrogen and sulfur wet deposition and their trends estimated by six chemistry transport models for the period 1990–2010

    Mark R. Theobald;Marta G. Vivanco;Wenche Aas;Camilla Andersson

  • A monodisperse aerosol dynamics module, a promising candidate for use in long-range transport models: Box model tests

    L. Pirjola;S. Tsyro;L. Tarrason;M. Kulmala

  • Modeled deposition of nitrogen and sulfur in Europe estimated by 14 air quality model systems: evaluation, effects of changes in emissions and implications for habitat protection.

    Marta G. Vivanco;Mark R. Theobald;Héctor García-Gómez;Juan Luis Garrido

  • EURODELTA-Trends, a multi-model experiment of air quality hindcast in Europe over 1990-2010

    Augustin Colette;Camilla Andersson;Astrid Manders;Kathleen Mar

  • Transboundary acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe in 2011

    Michael Schulz;Michael Gauss;Anna Benedictow;Jan Eiof Jonson

  • Air pollution trends in the EMEP region between 1990 and 2012. Joint Report of the EMEP Task Force on Measurements and Modelling (TFMM), Chemical Co-ordinating Centre (CCC), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East (MSC-E), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W).

    Augustin Colette;Wenche Aas;Lindsay Banin;Christine F. Braban

Frequent Co-Authors

Hilde Fagerli
Hilde Fagerli Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Mihaela Mircea
Mihaela Mircea National Agency For New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development
Robert Bergström
Robert Bergström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Augustin Colette
Augustin Colette Stanford University
Michael Schulz
Michael Schulz Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Bertrand Bessagnet
Bertrand Bessagnet École Normale Supérieure
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Kostas Tsigaridis
Kostas Tsigaridis Columbia University
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Huisheng Bian
Huisheng Bian University of Maryland, Baltimore County

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can broaden career opportunities. Many students complement their environmental knowledge with social sciences. Programs like the best online sociology bachelor degree offer insights into human-environment interactions, crucial for roles in policy and community engagement.

Advanced degrees can also boost expertise and career growth. Online doctoral options that focus on practical skills without extensive research allow professionals to advance efficiently. Consider exploring doctoral programs online no dissertation for flexible pathways to higher qualifications.

Many educators in environmental fields benefit from continuing their training through online bridges. The eds to edd bridge program is a popular route for professionals aiming to deepen leadership and research skills in education and policy.

For those focused on social work intersecting with environmental justice, affordable and accredited options are available. Investigating the dsw programs can open doors to specialized roles supporting communities affected by environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Svetlana Tsyro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles