World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 34 9442 9040 123 120 78 4769

Svetlana Tsyro publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Svetlana Tsyro between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Svetlana Tsyro published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 13 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 10 publications
1998 2025

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Svetlana Tsyro: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 3
2008 3
2009 0
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 1
2014 3
2015 2
2016 11
2017 10
2018 6
2019 5
2020 4
2021 8
2022 17
2023 4
2024 3
2025 10
Total 106
Download as CSV

Svetlana Tsyro publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Svetlana Tsyro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257 78
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Svetlana Tsyro D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Svetlana Tsyro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123 34
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Svetlana Tsyro is affiliated with the Norwegian Meteorological Institute in Norway and has contributed substantially to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research focuses primarily on atmospheric science, with particular emphasis on atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, global and planetary change, and related environmental dynamics.

The scientist's work spans several subfields including atmospheric science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, automotive engineering, and environmental engineering. This diversity reflects a comprehensive approach to understanding atmospheric processes and their effects on climate and health.

Their main topics of research coverage include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Air quality and health impacts
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • COVID-19 impact on air quality

Svetlana Tsyro's recent publications demonstrate collaboration within the atmospheric science community, with frequent co-authors including Michael Gauss, Kostas Tsigaridis, Jesper Heile Christensen, Joakim Langner, and Cynthia Whaley.

Significant recent papers include:

  • "AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations" (2021), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Estimating lockdown-induced European NO 2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models" (2021), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III" (2021), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study" (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Clean air policies are key for successfully mitigating Arctic warming" (2022), published in Communications Earth & Environment

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, which has published ten of their papers. They have also published in Communications Earth & Environment, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Geophysical Research Letters, and Aerosol and Air Quality Research.

Best Publications

  • The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model -- technical description

    David Simpson;David Simpson;Anna Benedictow;Halldis Berge;Robert Bergström;Robert Bergström

  • Global and Regional Trends of Atmospheric Sulfur

    Wenche Aas;Augustin Mortier;Van C. Bowersox;Ribu Cherian

  • AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations

    Jonas Gliß;Augustin Mortier;Michael Schulz;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment

    Huisheng Bian;Huisheng Bian;Mian Chin;Didier A. Hauglustaine;Michael Schulz

  • Presentation of the EURODELTA III intercomparison exercise-evaluation of the chemistry transport models' performance on criteria pollutants and joint analysis with meteorology

    Bertrand Bessagnet;Guido Pirovano;Mihaela Mircea;Cornelius Cuvelier

  • Multi-model simulations of aerosol and ozone radiative forcing due to anthropogenic emission changes during the period 1990-2015

    Gunnar Myhre;Wenche Aas;Ribu Cherian;W Collins

  • To what extent can aerosol water explain the discrepancy between model calculated and gravimetric PM 10 and PM 2.5

    S. G. Tsyro

  • On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations

    Nick Schutgens;Nick Schutgens;Svetlana Tsyro;Edward Gryspeerdt;Edward Gryspeerdt;Daisuke Goto

  • Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling

    Nick A. J. Schutgens;Edward Gryspeerdt;Natalie Weigum;Svetlana Tsyro

  • Modelling of sea salt concentrations over Europe: key uncertainties and comparison with observations

    S Tsyro;Wenche Aas;Joana Soares;M Sofiev

  • Nitrogen deposition in Spain: Modeled patterns and threatened habitats within the Natura 2000 network

    H. García-Gómez;J.L. Garrido;M.G. Vivanco;L. Lassaletta

  • Estimating lockdown-induced European NO 2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models

    Jérôme Barré;Hervé Petetin;Augustin Colette;Marc Guevara

  • Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components

    Hilde Fagerli;Svetlana Tsyro;Jan Eiof Jonson;Ágnes Nyíri

  • Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III

    Maria Sand;Bjørn H. Samset;Gunnar Myhre;Jonas Gliß

  • Lessons learnt from the first EMEP intensive measurement periods

    Wenche Aas;Svetlana Tsyro;Elke Bieber;Robert Bergström;Robert Bergström

  • Modeling of elemental carbon over Europe

    S. Tsyro;D. Simpson;L. Tarrason;Z. Klimont

  • A multi-model comparison of meteorological drivers of surface ozone over Europe

    Noelia Otero;Jana Sillmann;Kathleen Mar;Henning W. Rust

  • Can further mitigation of ammonia emissions reduce exceedances of particulate matter air quality standards

    Bertrand Bessagnet;Maxime Beauchamp;Cristina Guerreiro;Frank de Leeuw

  • An evaluation of European nitrogen and sulfur wet deposition and their trends estimated by six chemistry transport models for the period 1990–2010

    Mark R. Theobald;Marta G. Vivanco;Wenche Aas;Camilla Andersson

  • A monodisperse aerosol dynamics module, a promising candidate for use in long-range transport models: Box model tests

    L. Pirjola;S. Tsyro;L. Tarrason;M. Kulmala

  • Modeled deposition of nitrogen and sulfur in Europe estimated by 14 air quality model systems: evaluation, effects of changes in emissions and implications for habitat protection.

    Marta G. Vivanco;Mark R. Theobald;Héctor García-Gómez;Juan Luis Garrido

  • EURODELTA-Trends, a multi-model experiment of air quality hindcast in Europe over 1990-2010

    Augustin Colette;Camilla Andersson;Astrid Manders;Kathleen Mar

  • Transboundary acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe in 2011

    Michael Schulz;Michael Gauss;Anna Benedictow;Jan Eiof Jonson

  • Air pollution trends in the EMEP region between 1990 and 2012. Joint Report of the EMEP Task Force on Measurements and Modelling (TFMM), Chemical Co-ordinating Centre (CCC), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East (MSC-E), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W).

    Augustin Colette;Wenche Aas;Lindsay Banin;Christine F. Braban

Frequent Co-Authors

Hilde Fagerli
Hilde Fagerli Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Mihaela Mircea
Mihaela Mircea National Agency For New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development
Robert Bergström
Robert Bergström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Augustin Colette
Augustin Colette Stanford University
Michael Schulz
Michael Schulz Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Bertrand Bessagnet
Bertrand Bessagnet École Normale Supérieure
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Kostas Tsigaridis
Kostas Tsigaridis Columbia University
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Huisheng Bian
Huisheng Bian University of Maryland, Baltimore County

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can broaden career opportunities. Many students complement their environmental knowledge with social sciences. Programs like the best online sociology bachelor degree offer insights into human-environment interactions, crucial for roles in policy and community engagement.

Advanced degrees can also boost expertise and career growth. Online doctoral options that focus on practical skills without extensive research allow professionals to advance efficiently. Consider exploring doctoral programs online no dissertation for flexible pathways to higher qualifications.

Many educators in environmental fields benefit from continuing their training through online bridges. The eds to edd bridge program is a popular route for professionals aiming to deepen leadership and research skills in education and policy.

For those focused on social work intersecting with environmental justice, affordable and accredited options are available. Investigating the dsw programs can open doors to specialized roles supporting communities affected by environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Svetlana Tsyro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles