World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 43 7458 6876 219 207 125 6248

Stephen Tisch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen Tisch between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen Tisch published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2018. 13 of the 144 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2018. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
2003 2025

144 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen Tisch: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 7
2006 10
2007 9
2008 7
2009 9
2010 3
2011 4
2012 2
2013 0
2014 4
2015 2
2016 2
2017 4
2018 32
2019 2
2020 5
2021 6
2022 7
2023 12
2024 7
2025 6
Total 144
Download as CSV

Stephen Tisch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Tisch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 125
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen Tisch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Tisch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen Tisch is affiliated with St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on neurological disorders, with a strong emphasis on the mechanisms and treatments of Parkinson's disease and other genetic neurodegenerative diseases. Their work also engages with advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and genetics associated with neurological conditions.

The main fields of study of Stephen Tisch include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Their subfields of study highlight a specialized interest in:

  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

The principal topics covered in their research are:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases

Stephen Tisch has coauthored multiple papers with frequent collaborators including Kain Kyle, Yael Barnett, Kishore R. Kumar, Joel Maamary, and Benjamin Jonker.

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Stephen Tisch are:

  • Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Monogenic Dystonia: The Effect of Gene on Outcome, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Deep brain stimulation in dystonia: factors contributing to variability in outcome in short and long term follow-up, 2022, Current Opinion in Neurology
  • An intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 causes the autosomal-dominant adult-onset ataxia SCA27B/ATX-FGF14, 2022, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • An intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 causes the autosomal-dominant adult-onset ataxia SCA27B/ATX-FGF14, 2023, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Loss-of-Function Variants in HOPS Complex Genes VPS16 and VPS41 Cause Early Onset Dystonia Associated with Lysosomal Abnormalities, 2020, Annals of Neurology

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Movement Disorders
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Annals of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Cortico-cortical coupling in Parkinson's disease and its modulation by therapy.

    Paul Silberstein;Alek Pogosyan;Andrea A. Kühn;Gary Hotton

  • Excessive synchronization of basal ganglia neurons at 20 Hz slows movement in Parkinson's disease.

    Chiung Chu Chen;Vladimir Litvak;Thomas Gilbertson;Andrea Kühn

  • Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoimmunity with brainstem, extrapyramidal, and spinal cord dysfunction

    Sean J. Pittock;Hiroaki Yoshikawa;J. Eric Ahlskog;Stephen H. Tisch

  • Dopamine dysregulation syndrome, impulse control disorders and punding after deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease

    Shen-Yang Lim;Sean S. O'Sullivan;Katya Kotschet;David A. Gallagher

  • Intra-operative recordings of local field potentials can help localize the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease surgery

    Chiung Chu Chen;Alek Pogosyan;Ludvic U. Zrinzo;Stephen Tisch

  • Deep brain stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area in the treatment of essential tremor

    Patric Blomstedt;Ulrika Sandvik;Stephen Tisch

  • Effect of electrode contact location on clinical efficacy of pallidal deep brain stimulation in primary generalised dystonia

    Stephen Tisch;Ludvic Zrinzo;Patricia Limousin;Kailash P Bhatia

  • Dystonia in neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation: outcome of bilateral pallidal stimulation

    L. Timmermann;K. A. M. Pauls;K. Wieland;R. Jech

  • An intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 causes the autosomal-dominant adult-onset ataxia SCA50/ATX-FGF14.

    Unknown

  • Stereotactic localization of the human pedunculopontine nucleus : atlas-based coordinates and validation of a magnetic resonance imaging protocol for direct localization

    Ludvic Zrinzo;Laurence V. Zrinzo;Stephen Tisch;Patricia Dowsey Limousin

  • Effects of contact location and voltage amplitude on speech and movement in bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

    Elina Tripoliti;Ludvic Zrinzo;Irene Martinez-Torres;Stephen Tisch

  • Severe tongue protrusion dystonia: clinical syndromes and possible treatment.

    S. A. Schneider;A. Aggarwal;M. Bhatt;E. Dupont

  • Deep brain stimulation effects in dystonia: time course of electrophysiological changes in early treatment.

    Diane Ruge;Stephen Tisch;Stephen Tisch;Marwan I. Hariz;Ludvic Zrinzo

  • The posterior subthalamic area in the treatment of movement disorders: past, present, and future.

    Patric Blomstedt;Ulrika Sandvik;Anders Fytagoridis;Stephen Tisch

  • Activation of the subthalamic region during emotional processing in Parkinson disease.

    A. A. Kühn;M. I. Hariz;P. Silberstein;S. Tisch

  • Oscillatory activity in the pedunculopontine area of patients with Parkinson's disease

    Alexandros G. Androulidakis;Paolo Mazzone;Vladimir Litvak;Vladimir Litvak;Will Penny

  • Variability of the subthalamic nucleus: the case for direct MRI guided targeting.

    K Ashkan;P Blomstedt;L Zrinzo;S Tisch

  • The basal ganglia: anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology

    Stephen Tisch;Paul Silberstein;Patricia Limousin-Dowsey;Marjan Jahanshahi

  • Pallidal stimulation modifies after-effects of paired associative stimulation on motor cortex excitability in primary generalised dystonia

    Stephen Tisch;John C. Rothwell;Kailash P. Bhatia;Niall Quinn

  • Hospitalisation and comorbidities in Parkinson's disease: a large Australian retrospective study

    Michal Lubomski;R Louise Rushworth;Stephen Tisch

  • Stimulation through electrodes implanted near the subthalamic nucleus activates projections to motor areas of cerebral cortex in patients with Parkinson's disease

    Colum D. MacKinnon;Ruth M. Webb;Paul Silberstein;Steven Tisch

Frequent Co-Authors

Marwan Hariz
Marwan Hariz Umeå University
Patricia Limousin
Patricia Limousin University College London
Ludvic Zrinzo
Ludvic Zrinzo University College London
Kailash P. Bhatia
Kailash P. Bhatia University College London
Marjan Jahanshahi
Marjan Jahanshahi University College London
Peter Brown
Peter Brown University of Oxford
John C. Rothwell
John C. Rothwell University College London
Niall Quinn
Niall Quinn University College London
Bruce J. Brew
Bruce J. Brew University of New South Wales
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often goes hand-in-hand with related fields like psychology, social work, and counseling. Students interested in the science of the mind can find flexible and cost-effective learning options, such as bachelors in psychology online. These programs provide a solid foundation for neuroscience or mental health careers.

For those drawn to clinical practice or community outreach, online msw programs offer pathways to become professional social workers, with content that sometimes overlaps with neuroscience.

Aspiring clinical psychologists can consider psy d programs, which focus on practical psychology training and may include courses in neuropsychology. Similarly, a career in marriage and family therapy can begin with the best online mft programs, helping graduates address relationships and behavioral health.

Many of these online programs are designed for flexibility and accessibility. By choosing related degrees or interdisciplinary pathways, students can tailor their studies to specialized areas in neuroscience and unlock a range of meaningful career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Tisch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles