World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 103 683 613 84 78 417 40308
Medicine 103 7343 6899 714 680 418 40309

Patricia Limousin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia Limousin between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia Limousin published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2017. 24 of the 439 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2017. 1993: 5 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications
1993 2025

439 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia Limousin: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 5
1994 2
1995 4
1996 10
1997 10
1998 7
1999 9
2000 4
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 5
2005 8
2006 18
2007 13
2008 14
2009 17
2010 19
2011 26
2012 27
2013 27
2014 24
2015 21
2016 28
2017 34
2018 13
2019 15
2020 17
2021 17
2022 9
2023 10
2024 10
2025 14
Total 439
Download as CSV

Patricia Limousin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Limousin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 408–417 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 417 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49 417
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia Limousin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Limousin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43 103
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia Limousin is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on neurology and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on neurological disorders and treatments, especially Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments.

Their extensive body of work spans 144 publications in medicine and 49 in neuroscience. Subfields include neurology with 138 publications, cellular and molecular neuroscience with 21, cognitive neuroscience with 13, as well as physiology and clinical psychology with 4 publications each.

Limousin's frequent publication venues include:

  • Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • Movement Disorders
  • npj Parkinson's Disease

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Parkinson's Disease and Spinal Disorders

Patricia Limousin has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Thomas Foltynie (56 joint publications)
  • Ludvic Zrinzo (44 joint publications)
  • Harith Akram (36 joint publications)
  • Jonathan Hyam (14 joint publications)
  • Nirosen Vijiaratnam (11 joint publications)

Selected recent publications include:

  • Ambroxol for the Treatment of Patients With Parkinson Disease With and Without Glucocerebrosidase Gene Mutations, 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • Neural signatures of hyperdirect pathway activity in Parkinson's disease, 2021, Nature Communications
  • How Does Deep Brain Stimulation Change the Course of Parkinson's Disease?, 2022, Movement Disorders
  • Exenatide once weekly over 2 years as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson's disease: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial: The 'Exenatide-PD3' study, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Exenatide once a week versus placebo as a potential disease-modifying treatment for people with Parkinson's disease in the UK: a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 2025, The Lancet

Best Publications

  • Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease.

    Paul Krack;Alina Batir;Nadège Van Blercom;Stephan Chabardes

  • Electrical Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced Parkinson's Disease

    Patricia Limousin;Paul Krack;Pierre Pollak;Abdelhamid Benazzouz

  • Effect on parkinsonian signs and symptoms of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation

    P. Limousin;P. Pollak;A. Benazzouz;D. Hoffmann

  • Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders

    Alim Louis Benabid;Pierre Pollak;Dongming Gao;Dominique Hoffmann

  • Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease

    Simon Little;Alex Pogosyan;Spencer Neal;Baltazar Zavala

  • Event-related beta desynchronization in human subthalamic nucleus correlates with motor performance.

    Andrea A. Kühn;David Williams;Andreas Kupsch;Patricia Limousin

  • Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Dilan Athauda;Kate Maclagan;Simon S Skene;Martha Bajwa-Joseph

  • Subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidal stimulation in young onset Parkinson's disease.

    Paul Krack;Pierre Pollak;P Limousin;D Hoffmann

  • Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation in parkinsonian and essential tremor.

    P Limousin;J D Speelman;F Gielen;M Janssens

  • Changes in cerebral activity pattern due to subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

    Patricia Limousin;John Greene;Pierre Pollak;John Rothwell

  • Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease

    Iciar Aviles-Olmos;John Dickson;Zinovia Kefalopoulou;Atbin Djamshidian

  • Bilateral subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson's disease affects neither memory nor executive functions: A consecutive series of 62 patients

    C. Ardouin;B. Pillon;E. Peiffer;P. Bejjani

  • α-Synucleinopathy associated with G51D SNCA mutation: a link between Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy?

    Aoife P. Kiely;Yasmine T. Asi;Eleanna Kara;Patricia Limousin;Patricia Limousin

  • Resting oscillatory cortico-subthalamic connectivity in patients with Parkinson's disease

    Vladimir Litvak;Vladimir Litvak;Ashwani Jha;Ashwani Jha;Alexandre Eusebio;Robert Oostenveld

  • Long-Term Electrical Inhibition of Deep Brain Targets in Movement Disorders

    A L Benabid;A Benazzouz;D Hoffmann;P Limousin

  • Excessive burden of lysosomal storage disorder gene variants in Parkinson's disease

    L.A. Robak;L.A. Robak;I.E. Jansen;I.E. Jansen;J van Rooij;A.G. Uitterlinden

  • Loss of VPS13C Function in Autosomal-Recessive Parkinsonism Causes Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Increases PINK1/Parkin-Dependent Mitophagy.

    Suzanne Lesage;Valérie Drouet;Elisa Majounie;Vincent Deramecourt

  • Long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease

    Patricia Limousin;Tom Foltynie

  • Unbiased screen for interactors of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 supports a common pathway for sporadic and familial Parkinson disease

    A. Beilina;I. N. Rudenko;A. Kaganovich;L. Civiero

  • Reducing hemorrhagic complications in functional neurosurgery: a large case series and systematic literature review.

    Ludvic Zrinzo;Thomas Foltynie;Patricia Limousin;Marwan I. Hariz;Marwan I. Hariz

  • Opposite motor effects of pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

    Paul Krack;Pierre Pollak;P Limousin;D Hoffmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Marwan Hariz
Marwan Hariz Umeå University
Thomas Foltynie
Thomas Foltynie University College London
Ludvic Zrinzo
Ludvic Zrinzo University College London
Peter Brown
Peter Brown University of Oxford
Marjan Jahanshahi
Marjan Jahanshahi University College London
Kailash P. Bhatia
Kailash P. Bhatia University College London
Andrew J. Lees
Andrew J. Lees University College London
Huiling Tan
Huiling Tan University of Oxford
Alek Pogosyan
Alek Pogosyan University of Oxford
Alexander L. Green
Alexander L. Green University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, you may also want to explore related online degrees and diverse career pathways in mental health and behavioral sciences. Many students opt for online programs such as marriage and family masters programs, which offer a direct route to working with families and couples in clinical settings.

A masters in psychology online can open doors to a wide variety of roles, from research to counseling. Cost is an important factor—prospective students should compare the psychology degree cost across accredited programs to find an option that fits their budget.

Additionally, those interested in social work can consider msw programs with high acceptance rate. These programs may offer a more accessible pathway for career entry while still providing valuable training for a range of clinical and community roles.

Exploring these options can help you find the best fit for your professional goals in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia Limousin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles