World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
6266
World Ranking
9094
National Ranking
115

Hilde Fagerli publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilde Fagerli sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Hilde Fagerli D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilde Fagerli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hilde Fagerli is affiliated with the Norwegian Meteorological Institute in Norway. Their research spans several fields, primarily focused on Environmental Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Engineering. The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields including Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Automotive Engineering, Environmental Engineering, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research covers multiple main topics, emphasizing Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Vehicle emissions and performance, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency, and Plant responses to elevated CO2.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hilde Fagerli include:

  • Reducing global air pollution: the scope for further policy interventions (2020), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Effects of global ship emissions on European air pollution levels (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Description of the uEMEP_v5 downscaling approach for the EMEP MSC-W chemistry transport model (2020), Geoscientific model development
  • Prediction of source contributions to urban background PM 10 concentrations in European cities: a case study for an episode in December 2016 using EMEP/MSC-W rv4.15 and LOTOS-EUROS v2.0 - Part 1: The country contributions (2020), Geoscientific model development
  • Airborne nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea: Past trends, source allocation and future projections (2021), Atmospheric Environment

Frequent co-authors of Hilde Fagerli are:

  • Zbigniew Klimont
  • Á. Nyíri
  • Svetlana Tsyro
  • Michael Gauss
  • Álvaro Valdebenito

Key publication venues where Hilde Fagerli has contributed include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science

In addition to articles, Hilde Fagerli has contributed to book publications, including a work published by TemaNord titled Revising PM2.5 emissions from residential combustion, 2005-2019 (2022).

Best Publications

  • The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model -- technical description

    David Simpson;David Simpson;Anna Benedictow;Halldis Berge;Robert Bergström;Robert Bergström

  • Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions

    D. Fowler;Kim Pilegaard;M.A. Sutton;Per Ambus

  • Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe

    Vigdis Vestreng;Gunnar Myhre;Hilde Fagerli;Stefan Reis

  • Global and Regional Trends of Atmospheric Sulfur

    Wenche Aas;Augustin Mortier;Van C. Bowersox;Ribu Cherian

  • Can we explain the trends in European ozone levels

    J. E. Jonson;D. Simpson;H. Fagerli;S. Solberg

  • Trends of nitrogen in air and precipitation: model results and observations at EMEP sites in Europe, 1980--2003.

    Hilde Fagerli;Wenche Aas

  • Reducing global air pollution: the scope for further policy interventions

    Markus Amann;Gregor Kiesewetter;Wolfgang Schöpp;Zbigniew Klimont

  • Long Term Trends in Sulphur and Nitrogen Deposition in Europe and the Cause of Non-linearities

    David Fowler;Rognvald Smith;Jennifer Muller;John Neil Cape

  • Presentation of the EURODELTA III intercomparison exercise-evaluation of the chemistry transport models' performance on criteria pollutants and joint analysis with meteorology

    Bertrand Bessagnet;Guido Pirovano;Mihaela Mircea;Cornelius Cuvelier

  • Spatial and temporal variations in ammonia emissions – a freely accessible model code for Europe

    Carsten Ambelas Skjøth;Camilla Geels;H Berge;Steen Gyldenkærne

  • Performance of European chemistry transport models as function of horizontal resolution

    Martijn Schaap;Cornelis Cuvelier;Carlijn Hendriks;Bertrand Bessagnet

  • Modelling street level PM 10 concentrations across Europe: source apportionment and possible futures

    G. Kiesewetter;J. Borken-Kleefeld;W. Schöpp;C. Heyes

  • Modeling historical long-term trends of sulfate, ammonium, and elemental carbon over Europe: A comparison with ice core records in the Alps

    Hilde Fagerli;Michel Legrand;Susanne Preunkert;Vigdis Vestreng

  • Comparison of modelled and monitored deposition fluxes of sulphur and nitrogen to ICP-forest sites in Europe

    David Simpson;David Simpson;H. Fagerli;S. Hellsten;J. C. Knulst

  • Deposition and emissions of reactive nitrogen over European forests: A modelling study

    D. Simpson;K. Butterbach-Bahl;H. Fagerli;M. Kesik

  • Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components

    Hilde Fagerli;Svetlana Tsyro;Jan Eiof Jonson;Ágnes Nyíri

  • Parameterization of vertical diffusion and the atmospheric boundary layer height determination in the EMEP model

    Amela Jeričević;Lukša Kraljević;Branko Grisogono;Hilde Fagerli

  • Lessons learnt from the first EMEP intensive measurement periods

    Wenche Aas;Svetlana Tsyro;Elke Bieber;Robert Bergström;Robert Bergström

  • Effects of global ship emissions on European air pollution levels

    Jan Eiof Jonson;Michael Gauss;Michael Schulz;Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen

  • An evaluation of European nitrogen and sulfur wet deposition and their trends estimated by six chemistry transport models for the period 1990–2010

    Mark R. Theobald;Marta G. Vivanco;Wenche Aas;Camilla Andersson

  • EURODELTA-Trends, a multi-model experiment of air quality hindcast in Europe over 1990-2010

    Augustin Colette;Camilla Andersson;Astrid Manders;Kathleen Mar

  • Transboundary acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe in 2011

    Michael Schulz;Michael Gauss;Anna Benedictow;Jan Eiof Jonson

  • Air pollution trends in the EMEP region between 1990 and 2012. Joint Report of the EMEP Task Force on Measurements and Modelling (TFMM), Chemical Co-ordinating Centre (CCC), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East (MSC-E), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W).

    Augustin Colette;Wenche Aas;Lindsay Banin;Christine F. Braban

Frequent Co-Authors

Svetlana Tsyro
Svetlana Tsyro Norwegian Meteorological Institute
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Harry Harmens
Harry Harmens Bangor University
Robert Bergström
Robert Bergström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Augustin Colette
Augustin Colette Stanford University
Bertrand Bessagnet
Bertrand Bessagnet École Normale Supérieure
Mihaela Mircea
Mihaela Mircea National Agency For New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development
Michael Schulz
Michael Schulz Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Michael Gauss
Michael Gauss Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Harald G. Zechmeister
Harald G. Zechmeister University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open additional career opportunities. Many learners seek affordable options, making an affordable online general studies degree a practical starting point. These programs offer flexibility and a broad foundation, helping students tailor their education to various environmental fields.

Additionally, some students look for programs that balance rigor with accessibility. Understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in choosing a path that fits personal learning styles while still advancing career goals in environmental sectors.

Specialized degrees like a geology online degree provide in-depth knowledge of earth processes, essential for roles in conservation and natural resource management. Similarly, geographic information systems (GIS) are crucial tools in environmental analysis, making the best GIS undergraduate programs valuable for students aiming to enhance technical expertise in spatial data and mapping.

Exploring these diverse online degree options can help aspiring environmental professionals find pathways that align with their interests, schedules, and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Hilde Fagerli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles