World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
22955
World Ranking
7272
National Ranking
559

Stephen S. Taylor publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen S. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 168 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stephen S. Taylor D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen S. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen S. Taylor is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on areas spanning Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, contributing to a total of 42 and 23 publications in these fields respectively.

The scientist has concentrated on several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research, Reproductive Medicine, and Plant Science. Their work addresses topics such as PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment, cancer genomics and diagnostics, DNA repair mechanisms, genomics and chromatin dynamics, CRISPR and genetic engineering, and RNA modifications related to cancer.

Recent notable publications by Stephen S. Taylor include:

  • Distinct transcriptional programs stratify ovarian cancer cell lines into the five major histological subtypes, 2021, Genome Medicine
  • A living biobank of ovarian cancer ex vivo models reveals profound mitotic heterogeneity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Human spermbots for patient-representative 3D ovarian cancer cell treatment, 2020, Nanoscale
  • DNA replication stress and emerging prospects for PARG inhibitors in ovarian cancer therapy, 2021, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • TP53 loss initiates chromosomal instability in fallopian tube epithelial cells, 2021, Disease Models & Mechanisms

Stephen S. Taylor frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Annals of Oncology, NAR Cancer, Genome Medicine, and Nature Communications.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Robert D. Morgan
  • Louisa Nelson
  • Joanne C. McGrail
  • Bethany M. Barnes
  • Anthony Tighe

Best Publications

  • Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores

    Claire Ditchfield;Victoria L. Johnson;Anthony Tighe;Rebecca Ellston

  • Cancer Cells Display Profound Intra- and Interline Variation following Prolonged Exposure to Antimitotic Drugs

    Karen E. Gascoigne;Stephen S. Taylor

  • The spindle assembly checkpoint.

    Pablo Lara-Gonzalez;Frederick G. Westhorpe;Stephen S. Taylor

  • Aurora-kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents.

    Nicholas Keen;Stephen Taylor

  • Polo-like kinase-1 is activated by aurora A to promote checkpoint recovery

    Libor Macůrek;Arne Lindqvist;Dan Lim;Michael A. Lampson

  • Kinetochore Localization of Murine Bub1 Is Required for Normal Mitotic Timing and Checkpoint Response to Spindle Damage

    Stephen S Taylor;Frank McKeon

  • RYBP-PRC1 Complexes Mediate H2A Ubiquitylation at Polycomb Target Sites Independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3

    Lígia Tavares;Emilia Dimitrova;David Oxley;Judith Webster

  • The Human Homologue of Bub3 Is Required for Kinetochore Localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related Protein Kinase

    Stephen S. Taylor;Edward Ha;Frank McKeon

  • Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine

    Stefano Santaguida;Anthony Tighe;Anna Morena D'Alise;Stephen S. Taylor

  • Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment.

    Jim R Hughes;Nigel Roberts;Simon McGowan;Deborah Hay

  • How do anti-mitotic drugs kill cancer cells?

    Karen E. Gascoigne;Stephen S. Taylor

  • ATR-X Syndrome Protein Targets Tandem Repeats and Influences Allele-Specific Expression in a Size-Dependent Manner

    Martin J. Law;Karen M. Lower;Hsiao P.J. Voon;Jim R. Hughes

  • The kinase haspin is required for mitotic histone H3 Thr 3 phosphorylation and normal metaphase chromosome alignment

    Jun Dai;Sammy Sultan;Stephen S. Taylor;Jonathan M.G. Higgins

  • Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression

    Victoria L. Johnson;Maria I. F. Scott;Sarah V. Holt;Deema Hussein

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes Are Propagated by Rare and Distinct Human Cancer Stem Cells In Vivo

    Petter S. Woll;Una Kjällquist;Onima Chowdhury;Helen Doolittle

  • Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex.

    Laura Hewitt;Anthony Tighe;Stefano Santaguida;Anne M. White

  • Validating Aurora B as an anti-cancer drug target.

    Fiona Girdler;Karen E. Gascoigne;Patrick A. Eyers;Sonya Hartmuth

  • Recognizing and exploiting differences between RNAi and small-molecule inhibitors.

    William A Weiss;Stephen S Taylor;Kevan M Shokat

  • Intragenic Enhancers Act as Alternative Promoters

    Monika S. Kowalczyk;Jim R. Hughes;David Garrick;Magnus D. Lynch

  • Suppression of the alternative lengthening of telomere pathway by the chromatin remodelling factor ATRX

    David Clynes;Clare Jelinska;Barbara Xella;Helena Ayyub

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon J. McGowan
Simon J. McGowan University of Oxford
Paresh Vyas
Paresh Vyas University of Oxford
James Hughes
James Hughes Emory University
Douglas R. Higgs
Douglas R. Higgs University of Oxford
Richard J. Gibbons
Richard J. Gibbons University of Oxford
Andrea Musacchio
Andrea Musacchio Max Planck Society
Sarah Rowland-Jones
Sarah Rowland-Jones University of Sheffield
Claus Nerlov
Claus Nerlov University of Oxford
Sten Eirik W. Jacobsen
Sten Eirik W. Jacobsen University of Oxford
Grace John-Stewart
Grace John-Stewart University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond traditional Biology and Biochemistry degrees, online education provides many flexible options. Students looking for entry-level healthcare roles may consider medical assistant courses online, which can help launch a career in patient care and healthcare administration.

If you’re already a medical assistant seeking advancement, a medical assistant to lpn bridge program can be a strategic step toward becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). These bridge programs allow for upward mobility and greater hands-on responsibility within clinical environments.

Those interested in scientific research or laboratory careers may want to pursue a biology degree online. These accelerated programs can help you earn your credentials faster, making it easier to balance education with personal and work commitments.

Additionally, you might consider an asn program online to qualify for nursing licensure and patient care roles. With online options, you can train for a rewarding healthcare career while enjoying flexibility in your studies.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen S. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles