World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
20507
World Ranking
14316
National Ranking
7240

Stephen M. Factor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Factor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 234 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen M. Factor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Factor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen M. Factor is affiliated with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the United States. The profile reflects an academic career focused on medical research conducted within this institution.

No specific recent papers, coauthors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, or awards have been provided for this researcher. Therefore, there is no detailed information available regarding their scientific publications, collaborative network, or areas of specialized investigation.

As a medical researcher, Stephen M. Factor's professional activities likely involve contributions to the broader biomedical field, although specific details about their research focus or academic output are not present in the data.

Best Publications

  • TBX1 Is Responsible for Cardiovascular Defects in Velo-Cardio-Facial/DiGeorge Syndrome

    Sandra Merscher;Birgit Funke;Jonathan A. Epstein;Joerg Heyer

  • A mechanistic role for cardiac myocyte apoptosis in heart failure

    Detlef Wencker;Madhulika Chandra;Khanh Nguyen;Wenfeng Miao

  • GLUT4 heterozygous knockout mice develop muscle insulin resistance and diabetes

    Antine E. Stenbit;Tsu Shuen Tsao;Jing Li;Rémy Burcelin

  • A comparison of the pathological spectrum of hypertensive, diabetic, and hypertensive-diabetic heart disease.

    K H van Hoeven;S M Factor

  • Cardiac defects and renal failure in mice with targeted mutations in Pkd2.

    Guanqing Wu;G. S. Markowitz;Li Li;V. D. D'agati

  • Microvascular spasm in the cardiomyopathic Syrian hamster: a preventable cause of focal myocardial necrosis.

    S M Factor;T Minase;S Cho;R Dominitz

  • Capillary microaneurysms in the human diabetic heart.

    Stephen M. Factor;Ellen M. Okun;Takashi Minase

  • Hippocampal sclerosis : a common pathological feature of dementia in very old (≥80 years of age) humans

    D. W. Dickson;P. Davies;C. Bevona;K. H. Van Hoeven

  • Caveolin-3 knock-out mice develop a progressive cardiomyopathy and show hyperactivation of the p42/44 MAPK cascade

    Scott Eric Woodman;David S. Park;Alex W. Cohen;Michelle W C Cheung

  • Clinical and morphological features of human hypertensive-diabetic cardiomyopathy

    Stephen M. Factor;Takashi Minase;Edmund H. Sonnenblick

  • The heart as a suction pump.

    Thomas F. Robinson;Stephen M. Factor;Edmund H. Sonnenblick

  • Profound structural alterations of the extracellular collagen matrix in postischemic dysfunctional (stunned) but viable myocardium

    Mengjia Zhao;Hong Zhang;Thomas F. Robinson;Stephen M. Factor

  • Caveolin-1 null mice develop cardiac hypertrophy with hyperactivation of p42/44 MAP kinase in cardiac fibroblasts

    Alex W. Cohen;David S. Park;Scott E. Woodman;Terrence M. Williams

  • Results of endomyocardial biopsy in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia but without apparent structural heart disease.

    J E Strain;R M Grose;S M Factor;J D Fisher

  • Fas pathway is a critical mediator of cardiac myocyte death and MI during ischemia-reperfusion in vivo.

    Peiyee Lee;Masataka Sata;David J. Lefer;Stephen M. Factor

  • Current understanding of immunity to Trypanosoma cruzi infection and pathogenesis of Chagas disease.

    Fabiana S. Machado;Walderez O. Dutra;Walderez O. Dutra;Lisia Esper;Kenneth J. Gollob;Kenneth J. Gollob

  • Cardiac troponin T mutations result in allele-specific phenotypes in a mouse model for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Jil C. Tardiff;Timothy E. Hewett;Bradley M. Palmer;Charlotte Olsson

  • Caveolin-1/3 double-knockout mice are viable, but lack both muscle and non-muscle caveolae, and develop a severe cardiomyopathic phenotype.

    David S. Park;Scott E. Woodman;William Schubert;Alex W. Cohen

  • A truncated cardiac troponin T molecule in transgenic mice suggests multiple cellular mechanisms for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Jil C. Tardiff;Stephen M. Factor;Brian D. Tompkins;Timothy E. Hewett

  • Mice Expressing Mutant Myosin Heavy Chains Are a Model for Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Karen L. Vikstrom;Stephen M. Factor;Leslie A. Leinwand

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert B. Tanowitz
Herbert B. Tanowitz Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Louis M. Weiss
Louis M. Weiss Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Murray Wittner
Murray Wittner Yeshiva University
Edmund H. Sonnenblick
Edmund H. Sonnenblick Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Michael P. Lisanti
Michael P. Lisanti University of Salford
Leslie A. Leinwand
Leslie A. Leinwand University of Colorado Boulder
Richard N. Kitsis
Richard N. Kitsis Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Betty Diamond
Betty Diamond Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Philipp E. Scherer
Philipp E. Scherer The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Richard G. Pestell
Richard G. Pestell Baruch S. Blumberg Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in medicine grows, many students are exploring alternative pathways and related degrees online. These flexible options can lead to rewarding careers both within and alongside traditional healthcare roles.

For those focused on wellness and preventive care, consider a nutritionist online degree. This pathway opens doors to roles in clinical nutrition, public health, and wellness coaching.

If you’re aiming for leadership positions in healthcare, look for programs accredited by cahme. Such master’s programs focus on health administration, preparing you for pivotal management roles in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses with an associate degree can advance their education through rn to bsn programs without clinicals. These online programs offer flexibility while building skills in leadership, community health, and patient care.

Experienced nurses interested in advanced practice and leadership can explore dnp programs online. These programs are designed to enhance clinical expertise and open doors to the highest levels of nursing practice.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Factor

Recently Published Articles