World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sonja Zweegman

Sonja Zweegman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11629 10937 448 434 592 35698

Sonja Zweegman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sonja Zweegman between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sonja Zweegman published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 23.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 78 publications in 2023. 92 of the 742 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 78. Peak 78 publications in 2023. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 62 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 66 publications 2022: 44 publications 2023: 78 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 49 publications
1994 2025

742 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sonja Zweegman: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 1
2002 7
2003 5
2004 3
2005 6
2006 7
2007 13
2008 21
2009 20
2010 26
2011 22
2012 24
2013 29
2014 38
2015 33
2016 37
2017 31
2018 32
2019 62
2020 39
2021 66
2022 44
2023 78
2024 43
2025 49
Total 742
Download as CSV

Sonja Zweegman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sonja Zweegman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 592 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 592
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Sonja Zweegman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sonja Zweegman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sonja Zweegman is affiliated with Amsterdam UMC in the Netherlands and focuses their research primarily within the field of medicine. Their work extensively covers several subfields including hematology, oncology, molecular biology, immunology, and genetics. The principal topics explored in their research are multiple myeloma research and treatments, protein degradation and inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy research, peptidase inhibition and analysis, cancer treatment and pharmacology, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research.

Zweegman has contributed to multiple publications, frequently appearing in journals such as Blood, HemaSphere, Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia, Leukemia, and The Lancet Oncology. Their research collaboration network includes frequent coauthors like Niels W.C.J. van de Donk, Pieter Sonneveld, Philippe Moreau, Thierry Façon, and Annemiek Broijl.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Zweegman include:

  • Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study, 2020, The Lancet Haematology
  • Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) Report Within the HARMONY Project, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone in previously treated multiple myeloma (APOLLO): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group, 2021, The Lancet Oncology

Best Publications

  • International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Antonio Palumbo;Joan Blade

  • Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Randomized Phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 Trial

    Pieter Sonneveld;Ingo G.H. Schmidt-Wolf;Bronno Van Der Holt;Laila El Jarari

  • Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

    Philippe Moreau;Michel Attal;Cyrille Hulin;Bertrand Arnulf

  • Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

    P. Moreau;J. San Miguel;P. Sonneveld;M. V. Mateos

  • Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report

    Antonio Palumbo;Sara Bringhen;Maria Victoria Mateos;Alessandra Larocca

  • The novel AML stem cell–associated antigen CLL-1 aids in discrimination between normal and leukemic stem cells

    Anna Van Rhenen;Guus A.M.S. Van Dongen;Angè Le Kelder;Elwin J. Rombouts

  • Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.

    M A Dimopoulos;P Moreau;E Terpos;M V Mateos

  • High stem cell frequency in acute myeloid leukemia at diagnosis predicts high minimal residual disease and poor survival.

    Anna van Rhenen;Nicole Feller;Angèle Kelder;August H. Westra

  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score: Prospective International Assessment of an Abbreviated Symptom Burden Scoring System Among Patients With MPNs

    Robyn M. Emanuel;Amylou C. Dueck;Holly L. Geyer;Jean Jacques Kiladjian

  • Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group

    Michele Cavo;Evangelos Terpos;Cristina Nanni;Philippe Moreau

  • Personalized therapy in multiple myeloma according to patient age and vulnerability: A report of the European Myeloma Network (EMN)

    Antonio Palumbo;Sara Bringhen;Heinz Ludwig;Meletios A. Dimopoulos

  • Gene expression profiling for molecular classification of multiple myeloma in newly diagnosed patients

    Annemiek Broyl;Dirk Hose;Henk Lokhorst;Yvonne de Knegt

  • CD38 expression and complement inhibitors affect response and resistance to daratumumab therapy in myeloma.

    Inger S. Nijhof;Inger S. Nijhof;Tineke Casneuf;Jeroen van Velzen;Berris van Kessel

  • Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement

    Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Jens Hillengass;Saad Usmani;Elena Zamagni

  • European Myeloma Network Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma-related Complications

    Evangelos Terpos;Martina Kleber;Monika Engelhardt;Sonja Zweegman

  • A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma

    Henk M. Lokhorst;Bronno van der Holt;Sonja Zweegman;Edo Vellenga

  • Phase III Study of the Value of Thalidomide Added to Melphalan Plus Prednisone in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The HOVON 49 Study

    Pierre Wijermans;Martijn Schaafsma;Fabian Termorshuizen;Rianne Ammerlaan

  • Janus kinase-2 inhibitor fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (JAKARTA-2): a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study

    Claire N. Harrison;Nicolaas Schaap;Alessandro M. Vannucchi;Jean Jacques Kiladjian

  • Second primary malignancies with lenalidomide therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Antonio Palumbo;Sara Bringhen;Shaji K Kumar;Giulia Lupparelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Pieter Sonneveld
Pieter Sonneveld Erasmus University Rotterdam
Michele Cavo
Michele Cavo University of Bologna
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Meletios A. Dimopoulos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Roman Hájek
Roman Hájek University of Ostrava
Mario Boccadoro
Mario Boccadoro University of Turin
Tuna Mutis
Tuna Mutis Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anders Waage
Anders Waage Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Heinz Ludwig
Heinz Ludwig University of Vienna
Antonio Palumbo
Antonio Palumbo University of Turin
Claire N. Harrison
Claire N. Harrison Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always require attending traditional, on-campus programs. Many students today seek flexible options that fit their lifestyle and financial needs. Online degrees now offer diverse pathways into healthcare, opening doors to specialized fields beyond the typical MD route.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, affordable mha online programs provide an excellent foundation. These degrees prepare graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

If advanced nursing is your passion, consider dnp online programs cheap. Earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice online can help you take on leadership, clinical, or policy-making positions while balancing current work and family obligations.

Aspiring pharmacists can benefit from accredited programs like pharmacy school online accredited. These options ensure you receive a recognized education essential for licensure and future employment.

Lastly, technology-focused students should explore online mhi degrees. Managing health information is a fast-growing field bridging IT and healthcare, ideal for those interested in both industries.

Best Scientists Citing Sonja Zweegman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles