World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
37411
World Ranking
5003
National Ranking
98

Jan Mulder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Mulder sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jan Mulder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Mulder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Mulder is affiliated with the Science for Life Laboratory in Sweden. Their research spans several areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, contributing to both fundamental and applied biomedical sciences.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, Mulder focuses on key subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology
  • Immunology
  • Physiology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

The primary research topics covered in their body of work are:

  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Jan Mulder has published extensively in several scientific journals. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cell
  • Science Advances
  • Science
  • Acta Neuropathologica

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jan Mulder include:

  • A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues, 2021, Science Advances
  • Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays, 2022, Cell
  • An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain, 2020, Science
  • Distinct amyloid-β and tau-associated microglia profiles in Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Acta Neuropathologica
  • Cell transcriptomic atlas of the non-human primate Macaca fascicularis, 2022, Nature

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jan Mulder include:

  • Mathias Uhlén
  • Evelina Sjöstedt
  • Wen Zhong
  • Yonglun Luo
  • Xun Xu

Best Publications

  • Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics

    Linn Fagerberg;Björn M. Hallström;Per Oksvold;Caroline Kampf

  • Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics

    Patrik L. Ståhl;Patrik L. Ståhl;Fredrik Salmen;Sanja Vickovic;Anna Lundmark;Anna Lundmark

  • An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain

    Evelina Sjöstedt;Evelina Sjöstedt;Wen Zhong;Linn Fagerberg;Max J. Karlsson

  • Hardwiring the brain: endocannabinoids shape neuronal connectivity.

    Paul Berghuis;Ann M. Rajnicek;Yury M. Morozov;Ruth A. Ross

  • Molecular interrogation of hypothalamic organization reveals distinct dopamine neuronal subtypes

    Roman A Romanov;Amit Zeisel;Joanne Bakker;Fatima Girach

  • Distinct amyloid-β and tau-associated microglia profiles in Alzheimer’s disease

    Emma Gerrits;Nieske Brouwer;Susanne M. Kooistra;Maya E. Woodbury

  • Endocannabinoid signaling controls pyramidal cell specification and long-range axon patterning.

    Jan Mulder;Tania Aguado;Erik Keimpema;Klaudia Barabás

  • Increased Abundance of Opioid Receptor Heteromers After Chronic Morphine Administration

    Achla Gupta;Jan Mulder;Ivone Gomes;Raphael Rozenfeld

  • WNT Signaling in Activated Microglia Is Proinflammatory

    Carina Halleskog;Jan Mulder;Jenny Dahlström;Ken Mackie

  • Molecular reorganization of endocannabinoid signalling in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jan Mulder;Misha Zilberter;Susana J. Pasquaré;Susana J. Pasquaré;Alán Alpár

  • Renal sympathetic nerve activity modulates afferent renal nerve activity by PGE2-dependent activation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptors on renal sensory nerve fibers

    Ulla C. Kopp;Michael Z. Cicha;Lori A. Smith;Jan Mulder

  • Endocannabinoid functions controlling neuronal specification during brain development.

    Tibor Harkany;Erik Keimpema;Klaudia Barabás;Jan Mulder

  • Single-cell spatial transcriptome reveals cell-type organization in the macaque cortex

    Unknown

  • The Inhibitor Ko143 Is Not Specific for ABCG2

    Lora D. Weidner;Sami S. Zoghbi;Shuiyu Lu;Suneet Shukla

  • Renal sensory and sympathetic nerves reinnervate the kidney in a similar time-dependent fashion after renal denervation in rats.

    Jan Mulder;Tomas Hökfelt;Mark M. Knuepfer;Ulla C. Kopp

  • Pituitary autoantibodies in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1.

    Sophie Bensing;Sergueï O. Fetissov;Jan Mulder;Jaakko Perheentupa

  • GPR39 Splice Variants Versus Antisense Gene LYPD1: Expression and Regulation in Gastrointestinal Tract, Endocrine Pancreas, Liver, and White Adipose Tissue

    Kristoffer L Egerod;Birgitte Holst;Pia S Petersen;Jacob B Hansen

  • Endothelial cell heterogeneity and microglia regulons revealed by a pig cell landscape at single-cell level

    Unknown

  • GABA action in immature neocortical neurons directly depends on the availability of ketone bodies.

    Sylvain Rheims;Carl D. Holmgren;Genevieve Chazal;Jan Mulder

  • CSF profiling of the human brain-enriched proteome reveals associations of neuromodulin and neurogranin to Alzheimer's disease

    Julia Remnestål;David Just;Nicholas Mitsios;Claudia Fredolini

  • N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonist MK-801 and Radical Scavengers Protect Cholinergic Nucleus Basalis Neurons against β-Amyloid Neurotoxicity

    T. Harkany;J. Mulder;M. Sasvári;I. Ábrahám

  • Characterization of NPY Y2 receptor protein expression in the mouse brain. II. Coexistence with NPY, the Y1 receptor, and other neurotransmitter-related molecules.

    Davor Stanić;Davor Stanić;Jan Mulder;Masahiko Watanabe;Tomas Hökfelt

Frequent Co-Authors

Mathias Uhlén
Mathias Uhlén Royal Institute of Technology
Tibor Harkany
Tibor Harkany Medical University of Vienna
Tomas Hökfelt
Tomas Hökfelt Karolinska Institute
Fredrik Pontén
Fredrik Pontén Uppsala University
Peter Nilsson
Peter Nilsson Royal Institute of Technology
Adil Mardinoglu
Adil Mardinoglu Royal Institute of Technology
Gunnar Schulte
Gunnar Schulte Karolinska Institute
Sophia Hober
Sophia Hober Royal Institute of Technology
Masahiko Watanabe
Masahiko Watanabe Hokkaido University
Paul G.M. Luiten
Paul G.M. Luiten University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring a future in neuroscience, there are several educational and career options to consider—especially with the flexibility of online learning. Many students today opt for an accelerated bachelor's degree to fast-track their journey into the field. These programs can help you earn your diploma quicker, so you can start gaining hands-on experience or advance to graduate study sooner.

Neuroscience can open doors to some of the best bachelor degrees to get in terms of employability and salary. Graduates often pursue roles in research, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and technology, which are among the highest paying jobs and majors overall.

For those wanting a cost-effective path, fafsa-approved online certificate programs may be a great option to boost your skills before committing to a full degree. Exploring these avenues can make your studies in neuroscience more accessible, affordable, and adaptable to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Mulder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles