World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
9243
World Ranking
5553
National Ranking
2631

Sam Stringfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Stringfield sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Sam Stringfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Stringfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sam Stringfield was affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research focus was mainly in the Social Sciences, with a particular concentration on Education as a subfield. Over the course of their career, Stringfield contributed to topics related to School Choice and Performance as well as Parental Involvement in Education.

Stringfield collaborated with several researchers throughout their work. Frequent co-authors included:

  • Charles Teddlie
  • Robert K. Wimpelberg
  • Peggy C. Kirby

Their body of work was published in several academic venues, though specific names and counts are unavailable. Stringfield did not leave behind documented recent papers with detailed publication information, but their involvement in Social Sciences and Education research is reflected in the publications and collaborations noted.

Throughout their career, the main research topics addressed by Stringfield encompassed:

  • School Choice and Performance
  • Parental Involvement in Education

Although there are no records of awards or book publications attributed directly to Stringfield, their professional contributions in the domains of education policy and school performance research remain part of the academic landscape related to those fields.

Stringfield's work, taken together, illustrates a focus on understanding and analyzing factors influencing educational outcomes and parental roles in schooling environments. The collaboration pattern indicates connections with scholars known for work in educational research and policy analysis.

Best Publications

  • Schools Make a Difference: Lessons Learned from a 10-Year Study of School Effects

    Charles Teddlie;Sam Stringfield

  • A behavior rating scale for the preschool child.

    Lenore Behar;Samuel Stringfield

  • Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review

    David Reynolds;Pam Sammons;Bieke De Fraine;Jan Van Damme

  • Working together for reliable school reform.

    Amanda Datnow;Sam Stringfield

  • School and system improvement: a narrative state-of-the-art review

    David Hopkins;Sam Stringfield;Alma Harris;Louise Stoll

  • Technology‐Supported Involvement of Entire Faculties in Examination of Student Data for Instructional Improvement

    Jeffrey C. Wayman;Sam Stringfield

  • Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom

    Charles Teddlie;Peggy C. Kirby;Sam Stringfield

  • Secondary Career and Technical Education and Comprehensive School Reform: Implications for Research and Practice

    Marisa Castellano;Sam Stringfield;James R. Stone

  • World Class Schools: International Perspectives on School Effectiveness

    D Reynolds;B.P.M. Creemers;S Stringfield;C Teddlie

  • Sensitivity to Context: The Past and Future of Effective Schools Research:

    Robert K. Wimpelberg;Charles Teddlie;Samuel Stringfield

  • SOFTWARE ENABLING SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT THROUGH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT DATA

    Jeffrey C. Wayman;Sam Stringfield;Mary Yakimowski

  • Comprehensive School Reform in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Contexts: Implementation and Outcomes from a Four-Year Study:

    Amanda Datnow;Geoffrey D. Borman;Sam Stringfield;Laura T. Overman

  • School Reform through a Highly Specified Curriculum: Implementation and Effects of the Core Knowledge Sequence.

    Amanda Datnow;Geoffrey Borman;Sam Stringfield

  • A Mixed Methods Sampling Methodology for a Multisite Case Study

    Julia Lynn Sharp;Catherine Mobley;Cathy Hammond;Cairen Withington

  • Data Use for School Improvement: School Practices and Research Perspectives

    Jeffrey C. Wayman;Sam Stringfield

  • Bold plans for school restructuring : the New American Schools designs

    Samuel C. Stringfield;Steven M. Ross;Lana Smith

  • Context Issues within School Effectiveness Research

    Charles Teddlie;Sam Stringfield;David Reynolds

  • Improving secondary students' academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability Schools project

    Sam Stringfield;David Reynolds;Eugene C. Schaffer

  • Promise, Progress, Problems, and Paradoxes of Three Phases of Accountability: A Longitudinal Case Study of the Baltimore City Public Schools

    Samuel C. Stringfield;Mary E. Yakimowski-Srebnick

  • Attempting to Enhance Students' Learning through Innovative Programs: The Case for Schools Evolving into High Reliability Organizations 1

    Sam Stringfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Teddlie
Charles Teddlie Louisiana State University
Amanda Datnow
Amanda Datnow University of California, San Diego
Bert P.M. Creemers
Bert P.M. Creemers University of Groningen
Steven M. Ross
Steven M. Ross Johns Hopkins University
Geoffrey D. Borman
Geoffrey D. Borman Arizona State University
Christopher Chapman
Christopher Chapman University of Oxford
Pam Sammons
Pam Sammons University of Oxford
Louise Stoll
Louise Stoll University College London
Daniel Muijs
Daniel Muijs University of Southampton
Roel Bosker
Roel Bosker University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities sector offers diverse opportunities for students aiming to build careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. With the growth of digital learning, earning a degree online has become more accessible and affordable, allowing students to balance their studies with work and other commitments.

Many students consider enrolling in cacrep accredited schools to ensure a high-quality education in counseling that meets professional licensure standards. Those interested in family dynamics and relationships often pursue a family therapy degree, which prepares graduates to work in clinical, school, or private practice settings.

If your passion lies in understanding human behavior, you may want to explore an online psychology degree. This path opens doors to roles in research, counseling, and organizational consulting. Another in-demand route is social work, and there are several online msw programs designed for flexibility and inclusivity.

With these options, students can tailor their educational journey while preparing for meaningful and impactful careers in the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Sam Stringfield

Recently Published Articles