World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5553 2631 189 9243

Sam Stringfield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sam Stringfield between 1974 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sam Stringfield published across 50 years, from 1974 to 2023, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2000. 4 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2000. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications
1974 2023

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sam Stringfield: publications per year, 1974 to 2023
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 6
1992 3
1993 1
1994 6
1995 5
1996 3
1997 4
1998 12
1999 5
2000 16
2001 8
2002 12
2003 5
2004 7
2005 9
2006 12
2007 5
2008 2
2009 2
2010 9
2011 4
2012 12
2013 9
2014 4
2015 6
2016 3
2017 11
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 2
2023 2
Total 195
Download as CSV

Sam Stringfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Stringfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 189
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sam Stringfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Stringfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Sam Stringfield was affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research focus was mainly in the Social Sciences, with a particular concentration on Education as a subfield. Over the course of their career, Stringfield contributed to topics related to School Choice and Performance as well as Parental Involvement in Education.

Stringfield collaborated with several researchers throughout their work. Frequent co-authors included:

  • Charles Teddlie
  • Robert K. Wimpelberg
  • Peggy C. Kirby

Their body of work was published in several academic venues, though specific names and counts are unavailable. Stringfield did not leave behind documented recent papers with detailed publication information, but their involvement in Social Sciences and Education research is reflected in the publications and collaborations noted.

Throughout their career, the main research topics addressed by Stringfield encompassed:

  • School Choice and Performance
  • Parental Involvement in Education

Although there are no records of awards or book publications attributed directly to Stringfield, their professional contributions in the domains of education policy and school performance research remain part of the academic landscape related to those fields.

Stringfield's work, taken together, illustrates a focus on understanding and analyzing factors influencing educational outcomes and parental roles in schooling environments. The collaboration pattern indicates connections with scholars known for work in educational research and policy analysis.

Best Publications

  • Schools Make a Difference: Lessons Learned from a 10-Year Study of School Effects

    Charles Teddlie;Sam Stringfield

  • A behavior rating scale for the preschool child.

    Lenore Behar;Samuel Stringfield

  • Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review

    David Reynolds;Pam Sammons;Bieke De Fraine;Jan Van Damme

  • Working together for reliable school reform.

    Amanda Datnow;Sam Stringfield

  • School and system improvement: a narrative state-of-the-art review

    David Hopkins;Sam Stringfield;Alma Harris;Louise Stoll

  • Technology‐Supported Involvement of Entire Faculties in Examination of Student Data for Instructional Improvement

    Jeffrey C. Wayman;Sam Stringfield

  • Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom

    Charles Teddlie;Peggy C. Kirby;Sam Stringfield

  • Secondary Career and Technical Education and Comprehensive School Reform: Implications for Research and Practice

    Marisa Castellano;Sam Stringfield;James R. Stone

  • World Class Schools: International Perspectives on School Effectiveness

    D Reynolds;B.P.M. Creemers;S Stringfield;C Teddlie

  • Sensitivity to Context: The Past and Future of Effective Schools Research:

    Robert K. Wimpelberg;Charles Teddlie;Samuel Stringfield

  • SOFTWARE ENABLING SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT THROUGH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT DATA

    Jeffrey C. Wayman;Sam Stringfield;Mary Yakimowski

  • Comprehensive School Reform in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Contexts: Implementation and Outcomes from a Four-Year Study:

    Amanda Datnow;Geoffrey D. Borman;Sam Stringfield;Laura T. Overman

  • School Reform through a Highly Specified Curriculum: Implementation and Effects of the Core Knowledge Sequence.

    Amanda Datnow;Geoffrey Borman;Sam Stringfield

  • A Mixed Methods Sampling Methodology for a Multisite Case Study

    Julia Lynn Sharp;Catherine Mobley;Cathy Hammond;Cairen Withington

  • Data Use for School Improvement: School Practices and Research Perspectives

    Jeffrey C. Wayman;Sam Stringfield

  • Bold plans for school restructuring : the New American Schools designs

    Samuel C. Stringfield;Steven M. Ross;Lana Smith

  • Context Issues within School Effectiveness Research

    Charles Teddlie;Sam Stringfield;David Reynolds

  • Improving secondary students' academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability Schools project

    Sam Stringfield;David Reynolds;Eugene C. Schaffer

  • Promise, Progress, Problems, and Paradoxes of Three Phases of Accountability: A Longitudinal Case Study of the Baltimore City Public Schools

    Samuel C. Stringfield;Mary E. Yakimowski-Srebnick

  • Attempting to Enhance Students' Learning through Innovative Programs: The Case for Schools Evolving into High Reliability Organizations 1

    Sam Stringfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Teddlie
Charles Teddlie Louisiana State University
Amanda Datnow
Amanda Datnow University of California, San Diego
Bert P.M. Creemers
Bert P.M. Creemers University of Groningen
Steven M. Ross
Steven M. Ross Johns Hopkins University
Geoffrey D. Borman
Geoffrey D. Borman Arizona State University
Christopher Chapman
Christopher Chapman University of Oxford
Pam Sammons
Pam Sammons University of Oxford
Louise Stoll
Louise Stoll University College London
Daniel Muijs
Daniel Muijs University of Southampton
Roel Bosker
Roel Bosker University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities sector offers diverse opportunities for students aiming to build careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. With the growth of digital learning, earning a degree online has become more accessible and affordable, allowing students to balance their studies with work and other commitments.

Many students consider enrolling in cacrep accredited schools to ensure a high-quality education in counseling that meets professional licensure standards. Those interested in family dynamics and relationships often pursue a family therapy degree, which prepares graduates to work in clinical, school, or private practice settings.

If your passion lies in understanding human behavior, you may want to explore an online psychology degree. This path opens doors to roles in research, counseling, and organizational consulting. Another in-demand route is social work, and there are several online msw programs designed for flexibility and inclusivity.

With these options, students can tailor their educational journey while preparing for meaningful and impactful careers in the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Sam Stringfield

Recently Published Articles