World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
11182
World Ranking
15032
National Ranking
6290

Russell O. Pieper publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell O. Pieper sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 161 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Russell O. Pieper D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell O. Pieper sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell O. Pieper is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States and works primarily within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Physiology.

Their work addresses a range of scientific topics with a focus on areas such as Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, DNA Repair Mechanisms, and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics.

Russell O. Pieper has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Sabrina M. Ronen, Pavithra Viswanath, J Costello, Joydeep Mukherjee, and Georgios Batsios.

Their most frequent publication venues include Neuro-Oncology, Neuro-Oncology Advances, Cell Reports, WFNOS 2022 Abstract Book, and Nature Communications. Within these venues, they have contributed predominantly to Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-Oncology Advances.

Notable recent papers by Russell O. Pieper include:

  • Metabolic imaging detects elevated glucose flux through the pentose phosphate pathway associated with TERT expression in low-grade gliomas, 2021, Neuro-Oncology
  • Patient-derived cells from recurrent tumors that model the evolution of IDH-mutant glioma, 2020, Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Non-invasive assessment of telomere maintenance mechanisms in brain tumors, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Retracted: Phosphoglycerate Mutase 1 Activates DNA Damage Repair via Regulation of WIP1 Activity, 2020, Cell Reports
  • MR-detectable metabolic biomarkers of response to mutant IDH inhibition in low-grade glioma, 2020, Theranostics

Best Publications

  • Loss of tumor suppressor PTEN function increases B7-H1 expression and immunoresistance in glioma

    Andrew T Parsa;James S Waldron;Amith Panner;Courtney A Crane

  • p53 Effects Both the Duration of G2/M Arrest and the Fate of Temozolomide-treated Human Glioblastoma Cells

    Yuichi Hirose;Mitchel S. Berger;Russell O. Pieper

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor activation in glioblastoma through novel missense mutations in the extracellular domain.

    Jeffrey C Lee;Jeffrey C Lee;Igor Vivanco;Rameen Beroukhim;Rameen Beroukhim;Julie H. Y Huang

  • DNA damaging agent-induced autophagy produces a cytoprotective adenosine triphosphate surge in malignant glioma cells

    M Katayama;T Kawaguchi;M S Berger;R O Pieper

  • Abrogation of the Chk1-mediated G2 Checkpoint Pathway Potentiates Temozolomide-induced Toxicity in a p53-independent Manner in Human Glioblastoma Cells

    Yuichi Hirose;Mitchel S. Berger;Russell O. Pieper

  • Formation of intracranial tumors by genetically modified human astrocytes defines four pathways critical in the development of human anaplastic astrocytoma.

    Yukihiko Sonoda;Tomoko Ozawa;Yuichi Hirose;Ken D. Aldape

  • Methylation of discrete regions of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) CpG island is associated with heterochromatinization of the MGMT transcription start site and silencing of the gene.

    George S. Watts;Russell O. Pieper;Joseph F. Costello;Yei Mei Peng

  • PTEN and Hypoxia Regulate Tissue Factor Expression and Plasma Coagulation by Glioblastoma

    Yuan Rong;Dawn E. Post;Russell O. Pieper;Donald L. Durden

  • Akt pathway activation converts anaplastic astrocytoma to glioblastoma multiforme in a human astrocyte model of glioma

    Yukihiko Sonoda;Tomoko Ozawa;Ken D. Aldape;Dennis F. Deen

  • Graded methylation in the promoter and body of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene correlates with MGMT expression in human glioma cells

    Joseph F. Costello;Bernard W. Futscher;Keizo Tano;Dawn M. Graunke

  • Contribution of Notch signaling activation to human glioblastoma multiforme

    Masayuki Kanamori;Tomohiro Kawaguchi;Janice M. Nigro;Burt G. Feuerstein

  • PI(3) kinase is associated with a mechanism of immunoresistance in breast and prostate cancer

    C A Crane;A Panner;J C Murray;S P Wilson

  • mTOR Controls FLIPS Translation and TRAIL Sensitivity in Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells

    Amith Panner;C. David James;Mitchel S. Berger;Russell O. Pieper

  • Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand with Systemic Administration of Temozolomide Prolongs Survival in an Intracranial Glioblastoma Xenograft Model

    Ryuta Saito;John R. Bringas;Amith Panner;Matyas Tamas

  • Lactate dehydrogenase A silencing in IDH mutant gliomas.

    Charles Chesnelong;Myriam M. Chaumeil;Michael D. Blough;Mohammad Al-Najjar

  • The p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Links the DNA Mismatch Repair System to the G2 Checkpoint and to Resistance to Chemotherapeutic DNA-Methylating Agents

    Yuichi Hirose;Makoto Katayama;David Stokoe;Daphne A. Haas-Kogan

  • Akt Activation Suppresses Chk2-Mediated, Methylating Agent–Induced G2 Arrest and Protects from Temozolomide-Induced Mitotic Catastrophe and Cellular Senescence

    Yuchi Hirose;Makoto Katayama;Olga K. Mirzoeva;Mitchel S. Berger

  • Methylation-related chromatin structure is associated with exclusion of transcription factors from and suppressed expression of the O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene in human glioma cell lines.

    Joseph F. Costello;Bernard W. Futscher;Roger A. Kroes;Russell O. Pieper

  • The Receptor Interacting Protein 1 Inhibits p53 Induction through NF-κB Activation and Confers a Worse Prognosis in Glioblastoma

    Seongmi Park;Kimmo J. Hatanpaa;Yang Xie;Bruce E. Mickey

  • Non-invasive in vivo assessment of IDH1 mutational status in glioma

    Myriam M. Chaumeil;Peder E. Z. Larson;Hikari A. I. Yoshihara;Olivia M. Danforth

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanna J. Phillips
Joanna J. Phillips University of California, San Francisco
Joseph F. Costello
Joseph F. Costello University of California, San Francisco
Mitchel S. Berger
Mitchel S. Berger University of California, San Francisco
Andrew T. Parsa
Andrew T. Parsa Northwestern University
Bernard W. Futscher
Bernard W. Futscher University of Arizona
Sarah J. Nelson
Sarah J. Nelson University of California, San Francisco
J. Gregory Cairncross
J. Gregory Cairncross University of Calgary
Daniel B. Vigneron
Daniel B. Vigneron University of California, San Francisco
Samuel Weiss
Samuel Weiss University of Calgary
C. David James
C. David James Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry can lead to a wide range of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and beyond. For those interested in advancing their education or changing their career path, there are many flexible online options to consider.

Healthcare professionals looking to specialize may explore online fnp programs to become Family Nurse Practitioners. If you’re passionate about nutrition, a dietician degree online is a valuable credential that can open doors in hospitals, wellness centers, and public health.

Registered nurses ready for advancement can consider rn to bsn online programs to broaden their career opportunities. Additionally, students seeking leadership roles might pursue the fastest online master's in healthcare administration programs to quickly gain management expertise.

Whether you are just starting out or advancing your current qualifications, these related online degree pathways provide flexible and affordable routes to success in the health and science sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Russell O. Pieper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles