World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rodney B. Thompson

Rodney B. Thompson

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
44
Citations
6160
World Ranking
3098
National Ranking
132

Rodney B. Thompson publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney B. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 120 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Rodney B. Thompson D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney B. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Identification of irrigation and N management practices that contribute to nitrate leaching loss from an intensive vegetable production system by use of a comprehensive survey

    R.B. Thompson;C. Martínez-Gaitan;M. Gallardo;C. Giménez

  • Fate of nitrogen in cattle slurry following surface application or injection to grassland

    R. B. Thompson;J. C. Ryden;D. R. Lockyer

  • Effects of salinity on fruit yield and quality of tomato grown in soil-less culture in greenhouses in Mediterranean climatic conditions

    J.J. Magán;M. Gallardo;R.B. Thompson;P. Lorenzo

  • Measurement and estimation of plastic greenhouse reference evapotranspiration in a Mediterranean climate

    M. D. Fernández;S. Bonachela;F. Orgaz;R. B. Thompson

  • Using plant water status to define threshold values for irrigation management of vegetable crops using soil moisture sensors

    R.B. Thompson;M. Gallardo;L.C. Valdez;M.D. Fernández

  • Proximal Optical Sensors for Nitrogen Management of Vegetable Crops: A Review

    Francisco M. Padilla;Marisa Gallardo;M. Teresa Peña-Fleitas;Romina de Souza

  • Ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry following surface application to grassland I. Influence of mechanical separation, changes in chemical composition during volatilization and the presence of the grass sward

    R. B. Thompson;B. F. Pain;D. R. Lockyer

  • Ammonia emission from grassland and livestock production systems in the UK.

    J.C. Ryden;D.C. Whitehead;D.R. Lockyer;R.B. Thompson

  • Ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry following surface application to grassland. II. Influence of application rate, wind speed and applying slurry in narrow bands.

    R. B. Thompson;B. F. Pain;Y. J. Rees

  • Evaluation of optical sensor measurements of canopy reflectance and of leaf flavonols and chlorophyll contents to assess crop nitrogen status of muskmelon

    Francisco M. Padilla;M. Teresa Peña-Fleitas;Marisa Gallardo;Rodney B. Thompson

  • Production and water use in lettuces under variable water supply

    M. Gallardo;L. E. Jackson;K. Schulbach;R. L. Snyder

  • Evaluation of the Watermark sensor for use with drip irrigated vegetable crops

    R.B. Thompson;M. Gallardo;T. Agüera;L.C. Valdez

  • Decision support systems and models for aiding irrigation and nutrient management of vegetable crops

    Marisa Gallardo;Antonio Elia;Rodney B. Thompson

  • Irrigation management of European greenhouse vegetable crops

    Luca Incrocci;Rodney B. Thompson;María Dolores Fernandez-Fernandez;Stefania De Pascale

  • Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives.

    Brian F Pain;Rodney B Thompson;Yvonne J Rees;Jonathon H Skinner

  • Use of stem diameter variations to detect plant water stress in tomato

    M. Gallardo;R. B. Thompson;L. C. Valdez;M. D. Fernández

  • Management factors affecting ammonia volatilization from land-applied cattle slurry in the Mid-Atlantic USA.

    R. B. Thompson;J. J. Meisinger

  • Threshold values of canopy reflectance indices and chlorophyll meter readings for optimal nitrogen nutrition of tomato

    F.M. Padilla;M.T. Peña-Fleitas;M. Gallardo;R.B. Thompson

  • Water use and production of a greenhouse pepper crop under optimum and limited water supply

    M.D. Fernández;M. Gallardo;S. Bonachela;F. Orgaz

  • Different Responses of Various Chlorophyll Meters to Increasing Nitrogen Supply in Sweet Pepper.

    Francisco M. Padilla;Romina de Souza;M. Teresa Peña-Fleitas;Marisa Gallardo

  • Determination of lower limits for irrigation management using in situ assessments of apparent crop water uptake made with volumetric soil water content sensors

    R.B. Thompson;M. Gallardo;L.C. Valdez;M.D. Fernández

  • Consideration of total available N supply reduces N fertilizer requirement and potential for nitrate leaching loss in tomato production

    Freddy Soto;Marisa Gallardo;Rodney B. Thompson;M. Teresa Peña-Fleitas

  • Shoot and root physiological responses to localized zones of soil moisture in cultivated and wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.)

    M. Gallardo;L.E. Jackson;R.B. Thompson

  • Short-term net N mineralization from plant residues and gross and net N mineralisation from soil organic matter after rewetting of a seasonally dry soil

    G.P. Sparling;D.V. Murphy;R.B. Thompson;I.R.P. Fillery

  • Rapid On-Farm Analysis of Manure Nutrients Using Quick Tests

    J. S. Van Kessel;J. B. Reeves;R. B. Thompson

  • Simulation of transpiration, drainage, N uptake, nitrate leaching, and N uptake concentration in tomato grown in open substrate.

    M. Gallardo;R.B. Thompson;J.S. Rodríguez;F. Rodríguez

  • Denitrification in slurry-treated soil: Occurrence at low temperatures, relationship with soil nitrate and reduction by nitrification inhibitors

    R.B. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Francisco M. Padilla
Francisco M. Padilla University of Almería
Claudio O. Stöckle
Claudio O. Stöckle Washington State University
Ian R. P. Fillery
Ian R. P. Fillery Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Youssef Rouphael
Youssef Rouphael University of Naples Federico II
Elias Fereres
Elias Fereres University of Córdoba
Louise E. Jackson
Louise E. Jackson University of California, Davis
Tom Misselbrook
Tom Misselbrook Rothamsted Research
José Luis Araus
José Luis Araus University of Barcelona
Martin H. Chantigny
Martin H. Chantigny Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
J.S. Van Kessel
J.S. Van Kessel Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rodney B. Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles