World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão

Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 35 8925 8599 34 33 212 6045

Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2013. 9 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2013. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 0
2001 3
2002 9
2003 7
2004 11
2005 10
2006 6
2007 11
2008 12
2009 12
2010 14
2011 12
2012 16
2013 22
2014 9
2015 14
2016 12
2017 9
2018 6
2019 4
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 5
2024 7
2025 2
Total 231
Download as CSV

Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 212 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317 212
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262 35
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão is affiliated with the Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica in Brazil and has contributed to the fields of engineering and computer science, with a specific focus on control and systems engineering. Their research spans several subfields including biomedical engineering, computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, and aerospace engineering.

The scientist's main research topics cover:

  • Control Systems and Identification
  • Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems

Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão has published extensively with frequent appearances in several journals. Preferred venues for publication include:

  • International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
  • Automatica
  • Journal of Control Automation and Electrical Systems
  • Food Chemistry
  • IEEE Access

Frequent coauthors include Rubens J. M. Afonso, Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira, Edvaldo Assunção, Sillas Hadjiloucas, and Mário César Ugulino de Araújo.

Recent papers by the scientist cover a range of topics and publication years, such as:

  • "Scores selection via Fisher's discriminant power in PCA-LDA to improve the classification of food data," 2021, Food Chemistry
  • "Task allocation and trajectory planning for multiple agents in the presence of obstacle and connectivity constraints with mixed-integer linear programming," 2020, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
  • "Mission Planning for Multiple UAVs in a Wind Field with Flight Time Constraints," 2020, Journal of Control Automation and Electrical Systems
  • "Identification of fractional-order transfer functions using exponentially modulated signals with arbitrary excitation waveforms," 2020, ISA Transactions
  • "An Output-Feedback Design Approach for Robust Stabilization of Linear Systems With Uncertain Time-Delayed Dynamics in Sensors and Actuators," 2023, IEEE Access

Best Publications

  • A method for calibration and validation subset partitioning.

    Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário César Ugulino Araujo;Gledson Emídio José;Marcio José Coelho Pontes

  • A variable elimination method to improve the parsimony of MLR models using the successive projections algorithm

    Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário César Ugulino Araújo;Wallace Duarte Fragoso;Edvan Cirino Silva

  • The successive projections algorithm

    Sófacles Figueredo Carreiro Soares;Adriano A. Gomes;Mario Cesar Ugulino Araujo;Arlindo Rodrigues Galvão Filho

  • The successive projections algorithm for spectral variable selection in classification problems

    Márcio José Coelho Pontes;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário César Ugulino Araújo;Pablo Nogueira Teles Moreira

  • NIR spectrometric determination of quality parameters in vegetable oils using iPLS and variable selection

    Alessandra Félix Costa Pereira;Márcio José Coelho Pontes;Francisco Fernandes Gambarra Neto;Sérgio Ricardo Bezerra Santos

  • Adaptive control for mobile robot using wavelet networks

    C. de Sousa;E.M. Hemerly;R.K.H. Galvao

  • Classification of Brazilian soils by using LIBS and variable selection in the wavelet domain.

    Marcio Jose Coelho Pontes;Juliana Cortez;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvao;Celio Pasquini

  • UV–Vis spectrometric classification of coffees by SPA–LDA

    Urijatan Teixeira Carvalho Polari Souto;Márcio José Coelho Pontes;Edvan Cirino Silva;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão

  • Near infrared reflectance spectrometry classification of cigarettes using the successive projections algorithm for variable selection.

    Edilene Dantas Teles Moreira;Márcio José Coelho Pontes;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário César Ugulino Araújo

  • Aspects of the successive projections algorithm for variable selection in multivariate calibration applied to plasma emission spectrometry

    Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Maria Fernanda Pimentel;Mario Cesar Ugulino Araujo;Takashi Yoneyama

  • Fractional Order Modeling of Large Three-Dimensional RC Networks

    R. K. H. Galvao;S. Hadjiloucas;K. H. Kienitz;H. M. Paiva

  • Assessment of infrared spectroscopy and multivariate techniques for monitoring the service condition of diesel-engine lubricating oils

    Arnobio Roberto Caneca;M. Fernanda Pimentel;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Cláudia Eliane da Matta

  • A strategy for selecting calibration samples for multivariate modelling

    Heronides Adonias Dantas Filho;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário Cesar Ugulino Araújo;Edvan Cirino da Silva

  • The successive projections algorithm for interval selection in PLS

    Adriano de Araújo Gomes;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário Cesar Ugulino de Araújo;Germano Véras

  • A comparative study of calibration transfer methods for determination of gasoline quality parameters in three different near infrared spectrometers.

    Claudete Fernandes Pereira;Maria Fernanda Pimentel;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Fernanda Araújo Honorato

  • Cross-validation for the selection of spectral variables using the successive projections algorithm

    Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvao;Mario Cesar Ugulino Araujo;Edvan Cirino Silva;Gledson Emidio Jose

  • Use of PHM Information and System Architecture for Optimized Aircraft Maintenance Planning

    Leonardo R. Rodrigues;Joao P. P. Gomes;Felipe A. S. Ferri;Ivo P. Medeiros

  • Robust modeling for multivariate calibration transfer by the successive projections algorithm

    Fernanda Araújo Honorato;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Maria Fernanda Pimentel;Benício de Barros Neto

  • A method for determination of COD in a domestic wastewater treatment plant by using near-infrared reflectance spectrometry of seston.

    Antonio C. Sousa;Maria Mônica L.M. Lucio;Ovídeo F. Bezerra Neto;Glauciene P.S. Marcone

  • Neural and Wavelet Network Models for Financial Distress Classification

    Victor M. Becerra;Roberto K. Galvão;Magda Abou-Seada

  • Screening analysis of beer ageing using near infrared spectroscopy and the Successive Projections Algorithm for variable selection

    Mahdi Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti;Seyed Saied Mohtasebi;Maria Luz Rodriguez-Mendez;Adriano A. Gomes

  • Model Predictive Control using Prognosis and Health Monitoring of actuators

    Eduardo Bento Pereira;Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvao;Takashi Yoneyama

  • An application of subagging for the improvement of prediction accuracy of multivariate calibration models

    Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão;Mário César Ugulino Araújo;Marcelo do Nascimento Martins;Gledson Emidio José

  • Analysis of spectroscopic measurements of leaf water content at terahertz frequencies using linear transforms

    Sillas Hadjiloucas;Roberto K. H. Galvão;John Wesley Bowen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mário César Ugulino de Araújo
Mário César Ugulino de Araújo Federal University of Paraíba
Heinrich Kurz
Heinrich Kurz RWTH Aachen University
Derek Abbott
Derek Abbott University of Adelaide
Wouter Saeys
Wouter Saeys KU Leuven
Héctor C. Goicoechea
Héctor C. Goicoechea National University of the Littoral
Yvan Vander Heyden
Yvan Vander Heyden Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Luiz Antonio de Almeida Pinto
Luiz Antonio de Almeida Pinto Federal University of Rio Grande
Maria Luz Rodriguez-Mendez
Maria Luz Rodriguez-Mendez University of Valladolid

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology graduates often seek additional qualifications to enhance their career prospects or pivot into new fields. Today, there are a variety of flexible online degree options to consider.

For those interested in business leadership, exploring the cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat options can help develop vital management skills without breaking the bank. If your interests lean toward the legal aspects of industry or technology, aba approved paralegal programs offer a streamlined path into legal support roles.

Human resources also remains a popular avenue, and pursuing a 1 year online masters in human resources can accelerate your ability to move into leadership within hiring and talent management. For those interested in shaping communication strategies in tech-driven industries, consider an online masters in communications for a flexible and in-demand qualification.

These related online degrees not only broaden your skill set, but also provide diverse career pathways that build upon your engineering and technology background.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles