World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
62438
World Ranking
8404
National Ranking
4345

Robert M. Carey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Carey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 497 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert M. Carey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Carey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Carey is affiliated with the University of Virginia Health System in the United States. Their work centers primarily on Medicine, with an emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, as well as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Additional subfields include Nutrition and Dietetics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research concentrates on topics related to Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension, Sodium Intake and Health, Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies, Renin-Angiotensin System Studies, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Robert M. Carey include:

  • Treatment of Hypertension, 2022, JAMA
  • Guideline-Driven Management of Hypertension, 2021, Circulation Research
  • The Unrecognized Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine (author: Jenifer M. Brown)
  • Harmonization of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure/Hypertension Guidelines: Comparisons, Reflections, and Recommendations, 2022, Circulation (author: Paul K. Whelton)
  • Evolution of the Primary Aldosteronism Syndrome: Updating the Approach, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (author: Anand Vaidya)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Carey include:

  • John J Gildea
  • Robin A. Felder
  • Paul K. Whelton
  • Susanna R. Keller
  • Wei Yue

Key venues in which the scientist has published are:

  • Hypertension
  • Circulation Research
  • The Journal of Urology
  • JAMA
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

In summary, Robert M. Carey's work focuses extensively on cardiovascular and metabolic health, particularly hypertension and its hormonal regulation mechanisms. Their collaborative efforts and recurrent publications in specialized journals reflect a sustained engagement with prominent aspects of medical research in these areas.

Best Publications

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Paul K. Whelton;Robert M. Carey;Wilbert S. Aronow;Donald E. Casey

  • Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research

    David A. Calhoun;Daniel Jones;Stephen Textor;David C. Goff

  • The Management of Primary Aldosteronism: Case Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatment: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

    John W. Funder;Robert M. Carey;Franco Mantero;M. Hassan Murad

  • Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research

    David A. Calhoun;Daniel Jones;Stephen Textor;David C. Goff

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    Paul K. Whelton;Robert M. Carey;Wilbert S. Aronow;Donald E. Casey

  • Potential U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

    Paul Muntner;Robert M. Carey;Samuel Gidding;Daniel W. Jones

  • Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Paul Muntner;Daichi Shimbo;Robert M. Carey;Jeanne B. Charleston

  • Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Robert M. Carey;David A. Calhoun;George L. Bakris;Robert D. Brook

  • The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure

    Robert M. Carey;Jeffrey Cutler;William Friedewald;Norman Gant

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary

    Paul K. Whelton;Robert M. Carey;Wilbert S. Aronow;Donald E. Casey

  • Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline.

    Robert M Carey;Paul K Whelton

  • Prevention and Control of Hypertension: JACC Health Promotion Series

    Robert M. Carey;Paul Muntner;Hayden B. Bosworth;Paul K. Whelton

  • The Unrecognized Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism: A Cross-sectional Study.

    Jenifer M Brown;Mohammed Siddiqui;David A Calhoun;Robert M Carey

  • Potential U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association High Blood Pressure Guideline

    Paul Muntner;Robert M. Carey;Samuel Gidding;Samuel Gidding;Samuel Gidding;Daniel W. Jones

  • Role of the Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Chronic Kidney Disease

    Helmy M. Siragy;Robert M. Carey

  • Ectopic secretion of corticotropin-releasing factor as a cause of Cushing's syndrome. A clinical, morphologic, and biochemical study.

    Robert M. Carey;Shalendra K. Varma;Charles R. Drake;Michael O. Thorner

  • G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 gene variants in human essential hypertension

    Robin A. Felder;Hironobu Sanada;Jing Xu;Pei Ying Yu

  • Identification and characterization of a functional mitochondrial angiotensin system

    Peter M. Abadir;D. Brian Foster;Michael Crow;Carol A. Cooke

  • The Unrecognized Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism.

    Anand Vaidya;Jenifer M Brown;Robert M Carey;Mohammed Siddiqui

  • Sustained hypersensitivity to angiotensin II and its mechanism in mice lacking the subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor (blood pressureysodiumybradykinin)

    Helmy M. Siragy;Tadashi Inagami;T Oshihiro Ichiki;Robert M. Carey

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin A. Felder
Robin A. Felder University of Virginia
Pedro A. Jose
Pedro A. Jose George Washington University
Paul K. Whelton
Paul K. Whelton Tulane University
Paul Muntner
Paul Muntner University of Alabama at Birmingham
Peng Xu
Peng Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Christopher M. Kramer
Christopher M. Kramer University of Virginia Health System
Kevin R. Lynch
Kevin R. Lynch University of Virginia
Samuel S. Gidding
Samuel S. Gidding Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
William F. Young
William F. Young Mayo Clinic
Jeremy D. Walston
Jeremy D. Walston Kyung Hee University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean becoming a physician—there are diverse online degrees and career pathways in healthcare. For non-nurses looking to fast-track their entry into advanced nursing, entry level msn programs online provide an accelerated route to specialized roles and leadership positions. These programs offer flexibility for career changers and those looking to upskill quickly.

If you’re seeking a more accessible path, consider enrolling in the easiest bsn program to get into, which is ideal for prospective nurses who want to minimize admission hurdles while earning a respected degree. Meanwhile, many students are discovering opportunities in healthcare administration, and the best medical billing and coding schools online combine accredited education with valuable financial aid options.

For licensed practical nurses (LPNs) eager to advance without standardized testing barriers, lpn to rn programs without teas test offer a seamless transition into higher-paying registered nurse roles.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Carey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles