World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard I. Cullather

Richard I. Cullather

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
15382
World Ranking
8479
National Ranking
3022

Richard I. Cullather publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard I. Cullather sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard I. Cullather D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard I. Cullather sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard I. Cullather is affiliated with the Langley Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant concentration in Atmospheric Science and Environmental Science subfields. More specifically, their work encompasses areas such as Cryospheric studies and observations, Climate variability and models, and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics.

The scientist has contributed to multiple research publications, including notable recent papers such as:

  • Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise, 2021, published in Nature
  • ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century, 2020, published in The Cryosphere
  • Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models, 2020, published in The Cryosphere
  • Understanding of Contemporary Regional Sea-Level Change and the Implications for the Future, 2020, published in Reviews of Geophysics
  • Future Sea Level Change Under Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 Scenarios From the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets, 2021, published in Geophysical Research Letters

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard I. Cullather include Sophie Nowicki, Hélène Seroussi, Eric Larour, Heiko Goelzer, and Nicolas C. Jourdain.

Publications by this scientist have appeared predominantly in venues such as The Cryosphere, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Climate, and Nature.

Within their research thematic areas, the scientist has explored topics spanning:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Climate change and permafrost

Richard I. Cullather's contributions reflect engagement with complex environmental systems, particularly the dynamics of ice sheets, sea level projections, and climate interactions at regional and global scales.

Best Publications

  • The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2)

    Ronald Gelaro;Will McCarty;Max J. Suárez;Max J. Suárez;Ricardo Todling

  • Mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet from 1992 to 2017.

    Andrew Shepherd;Erik Ivins;Eric Rignot;Ben Smith

  • Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise

    Tamsin L Edwards;Sophie Nowicki;Sophie Nowicki;Ben Marzeion;Regine Hock;Regine Hock

  • ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century

    Hélène Seroussi;Sophie Nowicki;Antony J. Payne;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer

  • Interannual variations in Antarctic precipitation related to El Niño‐Southern Oscillation

    Richard I. Cullather;David H. Bromwich;Michael L. Van Woert

  • ECMWF Analyses and Reanalyses Depiction of ENSO Signal in Antarctic Precipitation

    David H. Bromwich;Aric N. Rogers;Per Kållberg;Richard I. Cullather

  • The Atmospheric Hydrologic Cycle over the Arctic Basin from Reanalyses. Part I: Comparison with Observations and Previous Studies*

    Richard I. Cullather;David H. Bromwich;Mark C. Serreze

  • Spatial and Temporal Variability of Antarctic Precipitation from Atmospheric Methods

    Richard I. Cullather;David H. Bromwich;Michael L. Van Woert

  • Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models

    Sophie Nowicki;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Hélène Seroussi;Anthony J. Payne

  • Understanding of Contemporary Regional Sea-Level Change and the Implications for the Future

    Benjamin D. Hamlington;Alex S. Gardner;Erik Ivins;Jan T.M. Lenaerts

  • The Atmospheric Hydrologic Cycle over the Southern Ocean and Antarctica from Operational Numerical Analyses

    David H. Bromwich;Frank M. Robasky;Richard I. Cullather;Michael L. Van Woert

  • Precipitation over Greenland and its relation to the North Atlantic Oscillation

    David H. Bromwich;Qiu-shi Chen;Yufang Li;Richard I. Cullather

  • Future Sea Level Change Under Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 Scenarios From the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets

    Antony J. Payne;Sophie Nowicki;Sophie Nowicki;Ayako Abe‐Ouchi;Cecile Agosta

  • Direct measurements of meltwater runoff on the Greenland ice sheet surface

    Laurence C. Smith;Kang Yang;Lincoln H. Pitcher;Brandon T. Overstreet

  • Intercomparison of Precipitation Estimates over the Arctic Ocean and Its Peripheral Seas from Reanalyses

    Linette N. Boisvert;Melinda A. Webster;Alek A. Petty;Thorsten Markus

  • GEOS-S2S Version 2: The GMAO High Resolution Coupled Model and Assimilation System for Seasonal Prediction.

    Andrea Molod;Eric Hackert;Yury Vikhliaev;Bin Zhao

  • Evaluation of the Surface Representation of the Greenland Ice Sheet in a General Circulation Model

    Richard I. Cullather;Sophie M. J. Nowicki;Bin Zhao;Max J. Suarez

  • The Moisture Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA

    Richard I. Cullather;Michael G. Bosilovich

  • Analysis of the warmest Arctic winter, 2015‐2016

    Richard I. Cullather;Richard I. Cullather;Young-Kwon Lim;Young-Kwon Lim;Linette N. Boisvert;Linette N. Boisvert;Ludovic Brucker;Ludovic Brucker

  • Model forecast skill and sensitivity to initial conditions in the seasonal Sea Ice Outlook

    E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth;R. I. Cullather;W. Wang;J. Zhang

  • Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Volume 43. MERRA-2; Initial Evaluation of the Climate

    Randal D. Koster;Michael G. Bosilovich;Santha Akella;Coy Lawrence

  • Experimental protocol for sealevel projections from ISMIP6 standalone ice sheet models

    Sophie Nowicki;Antony J. Payne;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Helene Seroussi

Frequent Co-Authors

Sophie Nowicki
Sophie Nowicki University at Buffalo, State University of New York
David H. Bromwich
David H. Bromwich The Ohio State University
Andrea Molod
Andrea Molod Goddard Space Flight Center
Heiko Goelzer
Heiko Goelzer Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
Siegfried D. Schubert
Siegfried D. Schubert Goddard Space Flight Center
Randal D. Koster
Randal D. Koster Goddard Space Flight Center
Michiel R. van den Broeke
Michiel R. van den Broeke Utrecht University
Tore Hattermann
Tore Hattermann Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Michael G. Bosilovich
Michael G. Bosilovich Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences opens diverse career opportunities, but supplementing your knowledge with related degrees can enhance your professional prospects. For educators and researchers, programs like the eds to edd bridge program provide a seamless path toward advanced leadership roles in academia and policy-making.

For those interested in social impact and community-focused roles, pursuing a degree through fully funded dsw programs can be an excellent option. These programs equip learners with the skills to address environmental justice, a growing concern in environmental sciences careers.

If you’re looking for a flexible start or wish to complement your environmental studies with broad foundational knowledge, consider an accredited affordable online general studies degree. This option offers versatility and affordability, making it easier to tailor your education to your goals.

For those just beginning, identifying what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help choose a manageable pathway while building essential skills. Combining environmental science with straightforward degree options opens doors to varied career paths in sustainability, policy, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Richard I. Cullather

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles