World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 56 3654 1395 164 11018

Richard A. Fenske publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard A. Fenske between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard A. Fenske published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2006. 1 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2006. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 12 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1981 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard A. Fenske: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 3
1988 5
1989 2
1990 4
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 6
1995 2
1996 5
1997 8
1998 8
1999 7
2000 9
2001 1
2002 12
2003 8
2004 4
2005 7
2006 16
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 8
2011 3
2012 5
2013 4
2014 4
2015 6
2016 7
2017 2
2018 2
2019 3
2020 3
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 171
Download as CSV

Richard A. Fenske publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Fenske sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 164
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard A. Fenske D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Fenske sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202 56
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard A. Fenske was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focused on Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with published work spanning multiple subfields including Plant Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, and Insect Science.

The scientist contributed to topics related to pesticide exposure and toxicity, pesticide and herbicide environmental studies, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, climate change and health impacts, agriculture and farm safety, and occupational health and safety research. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the environmental and health challenges connected to agriculture and chemical exposures.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by the scientist were:

  • Climate Change and the Amplification of Agricultural Worker Health Risks, 2021, Journal of Agromedicine
  • Flawed analysis of an intentional human dosing study and its impact on chlorpyrifos risk assessments, 2020, Environment International
  • Examining the role of wind in human illness due to pesticide drift in Washington state, 2000-2015, 2021, Environmental Health
  • What's the Best Way to Store Toxic 1080 Baits?, 2025, Ecological Management & Restoration
  • IARC Monographs: 40 Years of Evaluating Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans, 2020, UNC Libraries

The scientist collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Lianne Sheppard, Seth McGrew, Kent E. Pinkerton, Edward J. Kasner, and Joanne Bonnar Prado.

The main venues where their research was published included Environment International, Journal of Agromedicine, Environmental Health, Ecological Management & Restoration, and UNC Libraries. These venues reflect a broad interdisciplinary interest bridging environmental health, agricultural safety, and toxicology.

Best Publications

  • Organic Diets Significantly Lower Children’s Dietary Exposure to Organophosphorus Pesticides

    Chensheng Lu;Kathryn Toepel;Rene Irish;Richard A. Fenske

  • Pesticide exposure of children in an agricultural community: evidence of household proximity to farmland and take home exposure pathways.

    Chensheng Lu;Richard A. Fenske;Nancy J. Simcox;David Kalman

  • PESTICIDES IN HOUSEHOLD DUST AND SOIL : EXPOSURE PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN OF AGRICULTURAL FAMILIES

    Nancy J. Simcox;Richard A. Fenske;Sarah A. Wolz;I-Chwen Lee

  • Mechanisms underlying Children's susceptibility to environmental toxicants.

    Elaine M. Faustman;Susan M. Silbernagel;Richard A. Fenske;Thomas M. Burbacher

  • Organophosphorus pesticide exposure of urban and suburban preschool children with organic and conventional diets.

    Cynthia L Curl;Richard A Fenske;Kai Elgethun

  • Evaluation of take-home organophosphorus pesticide exposure among agricultural workers and their children.

    Cynthia L Curl;Richard A Fenske;John C Kissel;Jeffry H Shirai

  • Children's exposure to chlorpyrifos and parathion in an agricultural community in central Washington State.

    Richard A Fenske;Chensheng Lu;Dana Barr;Larry Needham

  • Biological monitoring of organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children of agricultural workers in central Washington State.

    Carrie Loewenherz;Richard A. Fenske;Nancy J. Simcox;Garland Bellamy

  • DERMAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES

    Fenske Ra

  • Biological monitoring survey of organophosphorus pesticide exposure among pre-school children in the Seattle metropolitan area.

    Chensheng Lu;Dianne E. Knutson;Jennifer Fisker-Andersen;Richard A. Fenske

  • Time-location analysis for exposure assessment studies of children using a novel global positioning system instrument.

    Kai Elgethun;Richard A Fenske;Michael G Yost;Gary J Palcisko

  • Temporal Association of Children's Pesticide Exposure and Agricultural Spraying: Report of a Longitudinal Biological Monitoring Study

    Denise Koch;Chensheng Lu;Jennifer Fisker-Andersen;Lance Jolley

  • Implications of global climate change for the assessment and management of human health risks of chemicals in the natural environment.

    John M. Balbus;Alistair B.A. Boxall;Richard A. Fenske;Thomas E. McKone

  • Comparison of global positioning system (GPS) tracking and parent-report diaries to characterize children's time–location patterns

    Kai Elgethun;Michael G Yost;Cole T E Fitzpatrick;Timothy L Nyerges

  • Pesticide take-home pathway among children of agricultural workers: study design, methods, and baseline findings.

    Beti Thompson;Gloria D Coronado;Julia E Grossman;Klaus Puschel

  • IARC monographs: 40 years of evaluating carcinogenic hazards to humans

    Neil Pearce;Aaron Blair;Paolo Vineis;Wolfgang Ahrens

  • Comparison of organophosphorus pesticide metabolite levels in single and multiple daily urine samples collected from preschool children in Washington State

    John C Kissel;Cynthia L Curl;Golan Kedan;Chensheng Lu

  • Assessment of organophosphorous pesticide exposures in the diets of preschool children in Washington State

    Richard A Fenske;Golan Kedan;Chensheng Lu;Jennifer A Fisker-Andersen

  • A Case-Crossover Study of Heat Exposure and Injury Risk in Outdoor Agricultural Workers.

    June T. Spector;David K. Bonauto;Lianne Sheppard;Tania Busch-Isaksen

  • Public health impacts of climate change in Washington State: projected mortality risks due to heat events and air pollution

    J. Elizabeth Jackson;Michael G. Yost;Catherine Karr;Cole Fitzpatrick

  • Estimating Pesticide Exposure from Dietary Intake and Organic Food Choices: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Cynthia L. Curl;Shirley A.A. Beresford;Richard A. Fenske;Annette L. Fitzpatrick

  • Field Measurement of Dermal Soil Loading Attributable to Various Activities: Implications for Exposure Assessment

    John C. Kissel;Karen Y. Richter;Richard A. Fenske

Frequent Co-Authors

Dana B. Barr
Dana B. Barr Emory University
Beti Thompson
Beti Thompson Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Pamela J. Lein
Pamela J. Lein University of California, Davis
Harvey Checkoway
Harvey Checkoway University of California, San Diego
Clement E. Furlong
Clement E. Furlong University of Washington
Edmund Seto
Edmund Seto University of Washington
Derek B. Booth
Derek B. Booth University of California, Santa Barbara
Ming-Yi Tsai
Ming-Yi Tsai University of Washington
Alan F. Hamlet
Alan F. Hamlet University of Notre Dame
Claudio O. Stöckle
Claudio O. Stöckle Washington State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree related to Environmental Sciences in the USA offers various pathways that align with different interests and career goals. For those seeking a more approachable academic route, exploring the easiest bachelors degree options can provide flexibility while still focusing on environmental topics.

Geoscience and geology are closely linked to environmental studies. Many students choose specialized online programs to deepen their knowledge. The best online geology degree programs combine theoretical learning with practical applications, making them ideal for careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and research.

Another innovative field gaining momentum is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), essential for environmental mapping and data analysis. High-quality gis degree programs equip students with skills vital for urban planning, conservation efforts, and disaster management, expanding career opportunities within environmental sectors.

For professionals aiming to impact environmental policy development, earning a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is beneficial. Accelerated options like the 1 year mpa online allow for rapid advancement into leadership roles within governmental and nonprofit organizations focused on sustainability and environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Fenske

Recently Published Articles