World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4211 1999 100 6604

Reed G. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reed G. Williams between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reed G. Williams published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2012. 4 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2012. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1973 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reed G. Williams: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 3
1977 2
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 8
2004 6
2005 5
2006 4
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 5
2012 11
2013 2
2014 5
2015 6
2016 4
2017 5
2018 1
2019 5
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 113
Download as CSV

Reed G. Williams publications per year - data summary

  • Reed G. Williams, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, has 113 publications recorded across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1973 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1973, 1974, 1980, 1982 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 13 of the 53 years in the span carry no publications at all (1978, 1981, 1983, 1984 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.8 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 6 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1973-1990: 21 publications (1.2 per year); 1991-2008: 35 publications (1.9 per year); 2009-2025: 57 publications (3.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Reed G. Williams publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reed G. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 100
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Reed G. Williams publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Reed G. Williams, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, records 100 publications - the 13th percentile of the discipline.
  • 13% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Reed G. Williams, and about 87% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Reed G. Williams ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Reed G. Williams D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reed G. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Reed G. Williams D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Reed G. Williams, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, records 44 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Reed G. Williams, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Reed G. Williams ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Reed G. Williams was affiliated with the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily contributed to the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their published work spanned key topics including Innovations in Medical Education, Surgical Simulation and Training, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Manufacturing Process and Optimization, 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis, Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction, and Influenza Virus Research Studies.

Williams co-authored several papers with frequent collaborators such as Debra L. Klamen, Brian C. George, Jordan D. Bohnen, Gary L. Dunnington, and Jonathan P. Fryer.

Their research appeared in various publication venues, including:

  • Annals of Surgery
  • Journal of Manufacturing Systems
  • Letters in Biomathematics
  • CVIR Endovascular
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Williams authored and contributed to the following recent papers:

  • A Proposed Blueprint for Operative Performance Training, Assessment, and Certification, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Deep learning-based semantic segmentation of machinable volumes for cyber manufacturing service, 2023, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
  • Mathematical Modeling and Analysis of Influenza In-Host Infection Dynamics, 2021, Letters in Biomathematics
  • Early and eighteen month clinical outcomes of first UK case of percutaneous deep vein arterialisation (pDVA) to treat "no option" chronic limb-threatening ischemia using the LimFlow system, 2021, CVIR Endovascular
  • Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings, 2020, Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Best Publications

  • Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.

    Reed G. Williams;Debra A. Klamen;William C. McGaghie

  • Readiness of US General Surgery Residents for Independent Practice

    Brian C. George;Jordan D. Bohnen;Reed G. Williams;Shari L. Meyerson

  • An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: a randomised controlled trial.

    Margaret L Boehler;David A Rogers;Cathy J Schwind;Ruth Mayforth

  • The briefing, intraoperative teaching, debriefing model for teaching in the operating room.

    Nicole K. Roberts;Reed G. Williams;Michael J. Kim;Gary L. Dunnington

  • Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents

    Jennine L. Larson;Reed G. Williams;Janet Ketchum;Margaret L. Boehler

  • The Feasibility of Real-Time Intraoperative Performance Assessment With SIMPL (System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning): Early Experience From a Multi-institutional Trial

    Jordan D. Bohnen;Brian C. George;Reed G. Williams;Mary C. Schuller

  • BEME systematic review: Predictive values of measurements obtained in medical schools and future performance in medical practice

    Hossam Hamdy;Kameshwar Prasad;M. Brownell Anderson;Albert Scherpbier

  • The Dr. Fox effect: a study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction.

    John E. Ware;Reed G. Williams

  • Surgeon information transfer and communication: factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care.

    Reed G. Williams;Ross Silverman;Cathy Schwind;John B. Fortune

  • Advancing Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education

    Susan R. Swing;Stephen G. Clyman;Eric S. Holmboe;Reed G. Williams

  • The impact of brief team communication, leadership and team behavior training on ad hoc team performance in trauma care settings

    Nicole K. Roberts;Reed G. Williams;Cathy J. Schwind;John A. Sutyak

  • Self-assessment in simulation-based surgical skills training

    Jeannie MacDonald;Reed G Williams;David A Rogers

  • The effect of gender on operative autonomy in general surgery residents.

    Shari L Meyerson;David D Odell;Joseph B Zwischenberger;Mary Schuller

  • Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competence

    R G Williams;H S Barrows;Nu Viet Vu;S J Verhulst

  • A Controlled Study to Determine Measurement Conditions Necessary for a Reliable and Valid Operative Performance Assessment: A Controlled Prospective Observational Study

    Reed G Williams;Hilary Sanfey;Xiaodong Phoenix Chen;Gary L Dunnington

  • Validity of student ratings of instruction under different incentive conditions: A further study of the Dr. Fox effect.

    Reed G. Williams;John E. Ware

  • Variables influencing medical student learning in the operating room

    Cathy J Schwind;Margaret L Boehler;David A Rogers;Reed G Williams

  • Capturing the teachable moment: A grounded theory study of verbal teaching interactions in the operating room

    Nicole K. Roberts;Michael J. Brenner;Reed G. Williams;Michael J. Kim

  • Do Individual Attendings’ Post-rotation Performance Ratings Detect Residents’ Clinical Performance Deficiencies?

    Cathy J Schwind;Reed G Williams;Margaret L Boehler;Gary L Dunnington

  • An Extended Visit with Dr. Fox: Validity of Student Satisfaction with Instruction Ratings after Repeated Exposures To A Lecturer

    Reed G. Williams;John E. Ware

  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies initiative: the road to implementation in the surgical specialties.

    Reed G. Williams;Gary L. Dunnington

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Ware
John E. Ware University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Debra A. DaRosa
Debra A. DaRosa Northwestern University
Nathaniel J. Soper
Nathaniel J. Soper Northwestern University
Michael A. Choti
Michael A. Choti The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University
Michael P. Brenner
Michael P. Brenner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William C. McGaghie
William C. McGaghie Northwestern University
David B. Swanson
David B. Swanson National Board of Medical Examiners
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Kameshwar Prasad
Kameshwar Prasad All India Institute of Medical Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse careers—and online degrees are making education more flexible and accessible than ever. Many students opt for online master's programs to rapidly gain advanced knowledge and skills in areas like psychology, sociology, history, or cultural studies, often finishing in just one year.

For those ready to earn a degree faster, accelerated bachelor's degree options offer flexible pathways to graduation. These programs are ideal for motivated students eager to enter the workforce or advance their careers quickly.

Social work is a popular path in the field. Students searching for quality education without heavy financial burden can consider online msw programs affordable, which provide a practical route to licensure and impactful social work roles.

Another growing area is behavioral analysis. The demand for Board Certified Behavior Analysts is increasing, and earning credentials through bcba programs online helps graduates prepare for meaningful work supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Reed G. Williams

Recently Published Articles