World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rafi Nachmias

Rafi Nachmias

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4614
World Ranking
12220
National Ranking
189

Rafi Nachmias publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rafi Nachmias sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 108 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rafi Nachmias D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rafi Nachmias sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rafi Nachmias is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and has contributed extensively to research in the overlapping areas of computer science, social sciences, and decision sciences. Their scholarly work addresses a variety of topics, including personal information management, mental health through writing, knowledge management, and educational technologies.

Their research spans multiple subfields such as communication, computer science applications, information systems and management, social psychology, and human-computer interaction. This interdisciplinary approach reflects the complexity of their focus areas and the integration of technological and behavioral perspectives.

Nachmias has published papers in several peer-reviewed venues, including:

  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Education and Information Technologies
  • Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
  • Aslib Journal of Information Management

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Nachmias cover themes related to affective and behavioral aspects of personal information management and the use of semantic web technologies for education. These include:

  • "Anxious and frustrated but still competent: Affective aspects of interactions with personal information management" (2020) - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • "Gaps between actual and ideal personal information management behavior" (2020) - Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Investigating the potential of the semantic web for education: Exploring Wikidata as a learning platform" (2023) - Education and Information Technologies
  • "The role of feelings in personal information management behavior: Deleting and organizing information" (2022) - Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
  • "Towards a typology of personal information management behavior: exploring and defining people's interactions with personal information" (2020) - Aslib Journal of Information Management

Frequent collaborators in Nachmias's research include Lilach Alon, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Anat Cohen, and Alona Forkosh-Baruch. These partnerships suggest ongoing work in related fields of communication, human-computer interaction, and information management.

The scientist's main research topics encompass:

  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Open Education and E-Learning
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Usability and User Interface Design

Best Publications

  • Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories

    Yael Friedler;Rafi Nachmias;Marcia C. Linn

  • Web-based Learning Environments: Current Pedagogical and Technological State

    David Mioduser;Rafi Nachmias;Orly Lahav;Avigail Oren

  • Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development*

    Marcia C. Linn;John W. Layman;Rafi Nachmias

  • Improved search engines and navigation preference in personal information management

    Ofer Bergman;Ruth Beyth-Marom;Rafi Nachmias;Noa Gradovitch

  • The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems

    Ofer Bergman;Ruth Beyth-Marom;Rafi Nachmias

  • Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face‐to‐face courses in higher education

    Tal Soffer;Rafi Nachmias

  • The project fragmentation problem in personal information management

    Ofer Bergman;Ruth Beyth-Marom;Rafi Nachmias

  • Factors Involved in the Implementation of Pedagogical Innovations Using Technology

    Rafi Nachmias;David Mioduser;Anat Cohen;Dorit Tubin

  • Evaluations of Science Laboratory Data: The Role of Computer-Presented Information

    Rafi Nachmias;Marcia C. Linn

  • Analysis Schema for the Study of Domains and Levels of Pedagogical Innovation in Schools Using ICT

    David Mioduser;Rafi Nachmias;Dorit Tubin;Alona Forkosh-Baruch

  • New Literacies for the Knowledge Society

    David Mioduser;Rafi Nachmias;Alona Forkosh-Baruch

  • Web-Supported Emergent-Collaboration In Higher Education Courses

    Rafi Nachmias;David Mioduser;Avigail Oren;Judith Ram

  • Types of Participant Behavior in a Massive Open Online Course

    Tali Kahan;Tal Soffer;Rafi Nachmias

  • Internet Usage by Students in an Israeli High School

    Rafi Nachmias;David Mioduser;Anat Shemla

  • Students' Use of Content in Web-Supported Academic Courses.

    Rafi Nachmias;Limor Segev

  • Domains and Levels of Pedagogical Innovation in Schools Using ICT: Ten Innovative Schools in Israel

    Dorit Tubin;David Mioduser;Rafi Nachmias;Alona Forkosh-Baruch

  • Online Persistence in Higher Education Web-Supported Courses

    Arnon Hershkovitz;Rafi Nachmias

  • WWW in Education

    David Mioduser;Rafi Nachmias

  • The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems design: Evidence and implementations

    Ofer Bergman;Ruth Beyth-Marom;Rafi Nachmias

  • A Research Framework for the Study of a Campus-Wide Web-Based Academic Instruction Project.

    Rafi Nachmias

  • Needle in a Hyperstack

    Rafi Nachmias;Amir Gilad

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcia C. Linn
Marcia C. Linn University of California, Berkeley
Steve Whittaker
Steve Whittaker University of California, Santa Cruz
Mark Sanderson
Mark Sanderson RMIT University
Yehuda Benayahu
Yehuda Benayahu Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to multiple online degree options and career trajectories. Many students are now considering online associates programs, which provide a flexible and affordable way to gain foundational skills and enter the tech workforce quickly.

For those looking to advance their careers or access specialized roles, pursuing masters degrees that are worth it can pay off, as these programs are often in high demand and directly tied to lucrative job markets.

Affordability is an important factor in education decisions. Many prospective students research the cheapest online colleges to find reputable programs that fit their budget, minimizing student debt.

If GPA is a concern, there are plenty of college that accepts low gpa available online. These schools understand different educational backgrounds and offer pathways into computer science for learners from all walks of life.

Best Scientists Citing Rafi Nachmias

Trending Scientists