World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 51 3692 3557 151 148 159 8346

Pierre Joly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre Joly between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre Joly published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2018. 1 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2018. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre Joly: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 5
1994 3
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 8
1999 6
2000 9
2001 10
2002 11
2003 6
2004 9
2005 10
2006 4
2007 8
2008 9
2009 13
2010 5
2011 10
2012 9
2013 9
2014 8
2015 11
2016 13
2017 11
2018 14
2019 8
2020 5
2021 5
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 236
Download as CSV

Pierre Joly publications per year - data summary

  • Pierre Joly, a Ecology and Evolution scholar from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, has 236 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1983 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1983, 1985, 1987, 1992 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1984, 1986, 1988, 1990 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.4 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 7 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1983-1997: 23 publications (1.5 per year); 1998-2012: 127 publications (8.5 per year); 2013-2025: 86 publications (6.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Pierre Joly publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Joly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 159 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205 159
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Joly publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 8,381 Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 37–41 to 531+ publications.
  • Pierre Joly, a Ecology and Evolution scholar from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, records 159 publications - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Ecology and Evolution scientists score the same or lower than Pierre Joly, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 147–151 publications range, and Pierre Joly ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 97–101 publications, holding 333 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 157–161 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 531 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Pierre Joly D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Joly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199 51
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Joly D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 8,381 Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 92 ranges running from 30 to 121+ D-Index.
  • Pierre Joly, a Ecology and Evolution scholar from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, records 51 D-Index - the 58th percentile of the discipline.
  • 58% of ranked Ecology and Evolution scientists score the same or lower than Pierre Joly, and about 42% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48 D-Index range, and Pierre Joly ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 40 D-Index, holding 280 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 60% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 52 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Pierre Joly is affiliated with Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France. Their research spans several interconnected fields within environmental and biological sciences, with a focus on the dynamics of aging, ecology, and population genetics in amphibians and other ectothermic tetrapods.

The main fields of study for Pierre Joly include Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work also addresses several subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The principal topics covered by their research encompass Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Genetic diversity and population structure, and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Pierre Joly include:

  • Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity (2022, Science)
  • Anthropogenic disturbance drives dispersal syndromes, demography, and gene flow in amphibian populations (2020, Ecological Monographs)
  • Drivers of amphibian population dynamics and asynchrony at local and regional scales (2020, Journal of Animal Ecology)
  • Sex-related differences in aging rate are associated with sex chromosome system in amphibians (2021, Evolution)
  • La vie dans les nuages (2025, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe))

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated multiple times with Pierre Joly include:

  • Hugo Cayuela
  • Jean-Paul Léna
  • Jan W. Arntzen
  • Beth A. Reinke
  • Jean-François Lemaître

Publication venues often featuring Pierre Joly's research are:

  • Science
  • Ecological Monographs
  • Evolution
  • Journal of Animal Ecology
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Best Publications

  • Impact of the introduction of the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) on survival rates of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis)

    A. Cadi;P. Joly

  • Competition for basking places between the endangered European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced red- eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans)

    A Cadi;P Joly

  • Habitat matrix effects on pond occupancy in newts.

    Pierre Joly;Claude Miaud;Anthony Lehmann;Odile Grolet

  • Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction

    Beat Oertli;Jeremy Biggs;Régis Céréghino;Patrick Grillas

  • Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability

    Nicolas Ray;Anthony Lehmann;Pierre Joly

  • Copepod hatching success in marine ecosystems with high diatom concentrations

    Xabier Irigoien;Roger P. Harris;Hans M. Verheye;Pierre Joly

  • Winter severity, survival, and cause-specific mortality of female white-tailed deer in north-central Minnesota

    Glenn D. Delgiudice;Michael R. Riggs;Pierre Joly;Wei Pan

  • Evolutionary ecology of facultative paedomorphosis in newts and salamanders.

    Mathieu Denoël;Mathieu Denoël;Pierre Joly;Howard H. Whiteman

  • The role of nocturnal vision in mate choice: females prefer conspicuous males in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea)

    Doris Gomez;Christina Richardson;Thierry Lengagne;Sandrine Plenet

  • Successful reproduction of the introduced slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) in the South of France

    Antoine Cadi;Virginie Delmas;Anne-Caroline Prévot-Julliard;Pierre Joly

  • Role of uncontrolled HIV RNA level and immunodeficiency in the occurrence of malignancy in HIV-infected patients during the combination antiretroviral therapy era: Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida (ANRS) CO3 Aquitaine Cohort.

    Mathias Bruyand;Rodolphe Thiébaut;Sylvie Lawson-Ayayi;Pierre Joly

  • Beyond occurrence: Body condition and stress hormone as integrative indicators of habitat availability and fragmentation in the common toad

    Agnès Janin;Jean-Paul Léna;Pierre Joly

  • Escape behaviour and ultimate causes of specific induced defences in an anuran tadpole.

    C. Téplitsky;Sandrine Plénet;Jean-Paul Léna;N. Mermet

  • Habitat fragmentation and amphibian conservation: building a tool for assessing landscape matrix connectivity.

    Pierre Joly;Claire Morand;Aurélie Cohas

  • Major Expansion of γδ T Lymphocytes following Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Allograft Recipients

    Julie Déchanet;Pierre Merville;Frank Bergé;Gabriel Bone-Mane

  • Tadpoles' responses to risk of fish introduction

    C. Teplitsky;S. Plénet;P. Joly

  • Trends in dementia incidence: Evolution over a 10-year period in France

    Leslie Grasset;Leslie Grasset;Carol Brayne;Pierre Joly;Pierre Joly;Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda;Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda

  • Diverse aging rates in ectothermic tetrapods provide insights for the evolution of aging and longevity

    Unknown

  • Resilience to climate variation in a spatially structured amphibian population.

    Avril Weinbach;Hugo Cayuela;Odile Grolet;A. Besnard

  • Variation in age structures in a subdivided population of Triturus cristatus

    Claude Miaud;Pierre Joly;Jacques Castanet

  • To breed or not to breed: past reproductive status and environmental cues drive current breeding decisions in a long-lived amphibian

    Hugo Cayuela;Hugo Cayuela;Aurélien Besnard;Eric Bonnaire;Haize Perret

  • Neoteny and progenesis as two heterochronic processes involved in paedomorphosis in Triturus alpestris (Amphibia: Caudata).

    Mathieu Denoël;Pierre Joly

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Commenges
Daniel Commenges University of Bordeaux
Aurélien Besnard
Aurélien Besnard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Mathieu Denoël
Mathieu Denoël University of Liège
Jean-François Dartigues
Jean-François Dartigues University of Bordeaux
Claude Miaud
Claude Miaud University of Montpellier
Rodolphe Thiébaut
Rodolphe Thiébaut University of Bordeaux
Geneviève Chêne
Geneviève Chêne University of Bordeaux
Marc Théry
Marc Théry Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Hélène Amieva
Hélène Amieva University of Bordeaux
François Dabis
François Dabis University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career paths, many of which increasingly value interdisciplinary education and flexible study options. Today, online degrees make it easier than ever to build on your current credentials or pivot to new science-based fields.

For those interested in life sciences and healthcare, accelerated nursing programs provide a fast track to advanced opportunities. For instance, the rn to bsn online programs help registered nurses earn a bachelor’s degree in as little as six months. There are also specialized pathways like adn to np programs online, which allow associate degree nurses to become nurse practitioners through convenient bridge programs.

If you’re considering a shift into nursing from another discipline—such as biology or environmental science—online msn programs for non nurses could be a fitting option. These programs are designed for non-nursing graduates seeking a master’s degree in nursing.

Choosing the right school is also essential. Comparing institutions, such as chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program, can help you find a program that matches your academic and career goals within the sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Joly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles