World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 60 1983 985 93 10720

Peter Model publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Model between 1969 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Model published across 48 years, from 1969 to 2016, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1997. 1 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1997. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1969 2016

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Model: publications per year, 1969 to 2016
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 2
1974 2
1975 4
1976 0
1977 3
1978 5
1979 7
1980 2
1981 4
1982 8
1983 3
1984 6
1985 5
1986 3
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 6
1991 4
1992 2
1993 1
1994 4
1995 2
1996 2
1997 10
1998 3
1999 3
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
Total 106
Download as CSV

Peter Model publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Model sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 93 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125 93
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Model D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Model sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120 60
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Model was affiliated with Rockefeller University in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the academic community in various capacities, primarily through research and publication activities.

Although detailed records of their recent papers are not available, the scope of their involvement in scientific research can be inferred from their career association and the nature of their academic contributions.

Peter Model did not have recorded frequent co-authors or a defined set of frequent publication venues. Similarly, specific main fields, subfields of study, and main topics of work for Peter Model are not documented in the available information.

No book publications or specific awards associated with Peter Model have been documented.

The scientist was deceased at the time of this profile's compilation.

Best Publications

  • Homologous recombination based modification in Escherichia coli and germline transmission in transgenic mice of a bacterial artificial chromosome.

    Xiangdong W. Yang;Peter Model;Nathaniel Heintz

  • Sorting of protein a to the staphylococcal cell wall

    Olaf Schneewind;Peter Model;Vincent A. Fischetti

  • Phage shock protein, a stress protein of Escherichia coli.

    Janice L. Brissette;Marjorie Russel;Lorin Weiner;Peter Model

  • Modification of DNA by reducing sugars: a possible mechanism for nucleic acid aging and age-related dysfunction in gene expression.

    Richard Bucala;Peter Model;Anthony Cerami

  • An artificial anchor domain: hydrophobicity suffices to stop transfer.

    Nicholas G. Davis;Peter Model

  • The Escherichia coli phage‐shock‐protein (psp) operon

    Peter Model;Goran Jovanovic;Jonathan Dworkin

  • Detection of prokaryotic signal peptidase in an Escherichia coli membrane fraction: endoproteolytic cleavage of nascent f1 pre-coat protein

    Chung Nan Chang;Gunter Blobel;Peter Model

  • Site-specific methylases induce the SOS DNA repair response in Escherichia coli.

    J Heitman;P Model

  • Convergent evolution of similar function in two structurally divergent enzymes.

    John Kuriyan;John Kuriyan;T. S. R. Krishna;T. S. R. Krishna;Lim Wong;Brian Guenther

  • Characterization and sequence of the Escherichia coli stress-induced psp operon.

    Janice L. Brissette;Lorin Weiner;Tracy L. Ripmaster;Peter Model

  • Interaction of mutant thioredoxins of Escherichia coli with the gene 5 protein of phage T7. The redox capacity of thioredoxin is not required for stimulation of DNA polymerase activity.

    H E Huber;M Russel;P Model;C C Richardson

  • Stress-induced expression of the Escherichia coli phage shock protein operon is dependent on sigma 54 and modulated by positive and negative feedback mechanisms.

    L Weiner;J L Brissette;P Model

  • Role of an Escherichia coli stress-response operon in stationary-phase survival

    Lorin Weiner;Peter Model

  • In vitro synthesis of bacteriophage f1 proteins

    Peter Model;Norton D. Zinder

  • Thioredoxin is required for filamentous phage assembly

    Marjorie Russel;Peter Model

  • Thioredoxin or glutaredoxin in Escherichia coli is essential for sulfate reduction but not for deoxyribonucleotide synthesis.

    M Russel;P Model;A Holmgren

  • Binding of mammalian ribosomes to ms2 phage rna reveals an overlapping gene encoding a lysis function

    John F. Atkins;Joan A. Steitz;Carl W. Anderson;Peter Model

  • Fine structure of a membrane anchor domain.

    Nicholas G. Davis;Jef D. Boeke;Peter Model

  • Lcoation of Filamentous Phage Minor Coat Proteins in Phage and in Infected Cells

    Heike Endemann;Peter Model

  • Identification, nucleotide sequence, and characterization of PspF, the transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli stress-induced psp operon.

    G Jovanovic;L Weiner;P Model

Frequent Co-Authors

Marjorie Russel
Marjorie Russel Rockefeller University
Norton D. Zinder
Norton D. Zinder Rockefeller University
Joseph Heitman
Joseph Heitman Duke University
Jef D. Boeke
Jef D. Boeke New York University
Hugh D. Robertson
Hugh D. Robertson Cornell University
Jeffrey V. Ravetch
Jeffrey V. Ravetch Rockefeller University
Nathaniel Heintz
Nathaniel Heintz Rockefeller University
Günter Blobel
Günter Blobel Rockefeller University
John Kuriyan
John Kuriyan Vanderbilt University
Arne Holmgren
Arne Holmgren Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career options, especially when combined with online degrees in related fields. Many students pair their bioscience backgrounds with advanced psychology credentials for more diverse roles in healthcare, research, or forensic analysis.

For example, pursuing an online masters in psychology can strengthen your understanding of behavioral research and make you a strong candidate for roles in biomedicine, neuropsychology, or pharmaceutical research teams. If you’re interested in working directly with patients or communities, exploring online clinical mental health counseling programs can help you bridge knowledge between biological sciences and clinical care.

Another pathway to consider is forensic biology, which often overlaps with criminal justice. Knowing how much does a forensic psychologist make can help you assess the potential of a specialized, high-demand career combining molecular analysis and psychological profiling.

For those interested in developmental science, studying a related online child psychology degree can prepare you for impactful jobs in research and clinical environments focused on children and adolescents.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Model

Recently Published Articles