World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
9320
World Ranking
4088
National Ranking
169

Peter M. Huck publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Huck sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 187 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter M. Huck D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Huck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter M. Huck is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with a strong emphasis on water treatment and related processes.

Over their career, they have contributed to a significant number of publications in the fields of environmental science and engineering, particularly addressing issues related to water quality and management. Their work also spans subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, pollution, environmental chemistry, environmental engineering, and civil and structural engineering.

The main topics explored in their research include water treatment and disinfection, wastewater treatment and nitrogen removal, urban stormwater management solutions, water systems and optimization, heavy metals in the environment, water resources management and optimization, and mercury impact and mitigation studies.

Peter M. Huck's recent papers highlight various aspects of water treatment technologies and water quality:

  • Removal of polystyrene microplastic spheres by alum-based coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) treatment of surface waters, 2021, Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Pilot-scale comparison of sodium silicates, orthophosphate and pH adjustment to reduce lead release from lead service lines, 2021, Water Research
  • Ion-Exchange Treatment of Perfluorinated Carboxylic Acids in Water: Comparison of Polystyrenic and Polyacrylic Resin Structures and Impact of Sulfate on Their Performance, 2022, ACS ES&T Water
  • In-line coagulation assessment for ultrafiltration fouling reduction to treat secondary effluent for water reuse, 2020, Water Science & Technology
  • Role of natural organic matter and hardness on lead release from galvanic corrosion, 2022, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as ACS ES&T Water, Water Research, AWWA Water Science, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology, and Chemical Engineering Journal.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Sigrid Peldszus
  • Kimia Aghasadeghi
  • Robin M. Slawson
  • Michele I. Van Dyke
  • William B. Anderson

Best Publications

  • A fatal waterborne disease epidemic in Walkerton, Ontario: comparison with other waterborne outbreaks in the developed world.

    S.E. Hrudey;P. Payment;P.M. Huck;R.W. Gillham

  • Adsorption characteristics of selected pharmaceuticals and an endocrine disrupting compound—Naproxen, carbamazepine and nonylphenol—on activated carbon

    Zirui Yu;Sigrid Peldszus;Peter M. Huck

  • Measurement of Biodegradable Organic Matter and Bacterial Growth Potential in Drinking Water

    Peter M. Huck

  • Biological filtration for BOM and particle removal: a critical review

    Daniel Urfer;Peter M. Huck;Stephen D.J. Booth;Bradley M. Coffey

  • Modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes with poly(vinyl alcohol) for fouling control in drinking water treatment.

    Jennifer R. Du;Sigrid Peldszus;Peter M. Huck;Xianshe Feng

  • Identifying fouling events in a membrane-based drinking water treatment process using principal component analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices.

    Ramila H. Peiris;Cynthia Hallé;Hector Budman;Christine Moresoli

  • Hydrologic modeling of pathogen fate and transport

    Sarah M Dorner;William B Anderson;Robin M Slawson;Nicholas Kouwen

  • Reversible and irreversible low-pressure membrane foulants in drinking water treatment: Identification by principal component analysis of fluorescence EEM and mitigation by biofiltration pretreatment

    Sigrid Peldszus;Cynthia Hallé;Ramila H. Peiris;Mohamed Hamouda

  • Biological treatment of public water supplies

    Bruce E. Rittmann;Peter M. Huck

  • Assessing the Performance of Biological Filtration As Pretreatment to Low Pressure Membranes for Drinking Water

    Cynthia Hallé;Peter M. Huck;Sigrid Peldszus;Jens Haberkamp

  • Effects of Media, Backwash, and Temperature on Full-Scale Biological Filtration

    Monica B. Emelko;Peter M. Huck;Bradley M. Coffey;E. Franklyn Smith

  • Measurement of biomass activity in drinking water biofilters using a respirometric method.

    Daniel Urfer;Peter M Huck

  • Reaction kinetics of selected micropollutants in ozonation and advanced oxidation processes

    Xiaohui Jin;Sigrid Peldszus;Peter M. Huck

  • Adsorption of Selected Pharmaceuticals and an Endocrine Disrupting Compound by Granular Activated Carbon. 1. Adsorption Capacity and Kinetics

    Zirui Yu;Sigrid Peldszus;Peter M Huck

  • Effects of temperature and biodegradable organic matter on control of biofilms by free chlorine in a model drinking water distribution system.

    S. Ndiongue;P.M. Huck;R.M. Slawson

  • Removal of polystyrene microplastic spheres by alum-based coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) treatment of surface waters

    Jinkai Xue;Jinkai Xue;Sigrid Peldszus;Michele I. Van Dyke;Peter M. Huck

  • Formation and Removal of Assimilable Organic Carbon During Biological Treatment

    Peter M. Huck;Phillip M. Fedorak;William B. Anderson

  • Optimizing gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of selected pharmaceuticals and endocrine-disrupting substances in water using factorial experimental design.

    Zirui Yu;Sigrid Peldszus;Peter M. Huck

  • A review of the use of XAD resins to concentrate organic compounds in water

    S.A. Daignault;D.K. Noot;D.T. Williams;P.M. Huck

  • Factors Affecting Drinking Water Biofiltration

    Xibo Liu;Peter M. Huck;Robin M. Slawson

  • Pathogen and indicator variability in a heavily impacted watershed.

    Sarah M. Dorner;William B. Anderson;Terri Gaulin;Heather L. Candon

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham A. Gagnon
Graham A. Gagnon Dalhousie University
Martin Jekel
Martin Jekel Technical University of Berlin
Phillip M. Fedorak
Phillip M. Fedorak University of Alberta
Steve E. Hrudey
Steve E. Hrudey University of Alberta
Xianshe Feng
Xianshe Feng University of Waterloo
Pierre Payment
Pierre Payment Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Raymond M. Hozalski
Raymond M. Hozalski University of Minnesota
Gary L. Amy
Gary L. Amy Clemson University
William A. Mitch
William A. Mitch Stanford University
Robert W. Gillham
Robert W. Gillham University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. A best online sociology bachelor degree provides valuable insight into social behaviors and environmental impacts, which is crucial for roles in policy-making and community outreach.

Educators and professionals aiming to specialize further may consider advanced programs like an online ed d programs without dissertation. These programs offer flexibility and practical knowledge without the traditional dissertation requirement, ideal for working professionals in environmental education.

For those seeking smooth academic progression, the online eds to edd bridge program allows educators to transition seamlessly from a master's-level to a doctoral-level qualification, enhancing leadership and research skills relevant to environmental studies.

Social work intersects with environmental sciences in community well-being and sustainable development. Prospective students can explore fully funded dsw programs online to advance their expertise with minimal financial burden, positioning themselves for impactful careers at the intersection of social justice and environmental health.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Huck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles