World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
81
Citations
20082
World Ranking
1592
National Ranking
780

Anne Smith publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 328 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anne Smith D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

    K. Vibe Fersum;Peter O'Sullivan;J. Skouen;J. Skouen;Anne Smith

  • Cognitive Functional Therapy: An Integrated Behavioral Approach for the Targeted Management of Disabling Low Back Pain

    Peter B O’Sullivan;J P Caneiro;Mary O’Keeffe;Anne Smith

  • Development of functional synergies for speech motor coordination in childhood and adolescence.

    Anne Smith;Howard N. Zelaznik

  • Spatiotemporal stability and patterning of speech movement sequences

    Anne Smith;Lisa Goffman;Howard N. Zelaznik;Goangshiuan Ying

  • Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter.

    Jennifer Kleinow;Anne Smith

  • Stability and Patterning of Speech Movement Sequences in Children and Adults

    Anne Smith;Lisa Goffman

  • How Stuttering Develops: The Multifactorial Dynamic Pathways Theory

    Anne Smith;Christine Weber

  • Articulatory movements in adolescents: evidence for protracted development of speech motor control processes.

    Bridget Walsh;Anne Smith

  • Lives on hold: A qualitative synthesis exploring the experience of chronic low-back pain

    Samantha Bunzli;Rochelle Watkins;Anne Smith;Rob Schütze

  • How Can We Best Reduce Pain Catastrophizing in Adults With Chronic Noncancer Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Robert Schütze;Clare Rees;Anne Smith;Helen Slater

  • Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter

    Anne Smith;Neeraja Sadagopan;Bridget Walsh;Christine Weber-Fox

  • Making Sense of Low Back Pain and Pain-Related Fear

    Samantha Bunzli;Anne Smith;Robert Schütze;Ivan Lin

  • Influences of utterance length and complexity on speech motor performance in children and adults

    Kimberly Jones Maner;Anne Smith;Liane Grayson

  • Speech motor development: Integrating muscles, movements, and linguistic units.

    Anne Smith

  • Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain (RESTORE): a randomised, controlled, three-arm, parallel group, phase 3, clinical trial

    Unknown

  • Autonomic correlates of stuttering and speech assessed in a range of experimental tasks.

    Christine M. Weber;Anne Smith

  • Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults.

    Anne Smith;Jennifer Kleinow

  • Speech motor stability in IPD: effects of rate and loudness manipulations.

    Jennifer Kleinow;Anne Smith;Lorraine Olson Ramig

  • On the assessment of stability and patterning of speech movements.

    Anne Smith;Michael T. Johnson;Clare McGillem;Lisa Goffman

  • Development and phonetic differentiation of speech movement patterns.

    Lisa Goffman;Anne Smith

  • Language and motor abilities of preschool children who stutter: evidence from behavioral and kinematic indices of nonword repetition performance.

    Anne Smith;Lisa Goffman;Jayanthi Sasisekaran;Christine Weber-Fox

  • Task-specific organization of activity in human jaw muscles.

    Christopher A. Moore;Anne Smith;Robert L. Ringel

  • Basic parameters of articulatory movements and acoustics in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

    Bridget Walsh;Anne Smith

  • Potential interactions among linguistic, autonomic, and motor factors in speech.

    Jennifer Kleinow;Anne Smith

  • Spatiotemporal Stability of Lip Movements in Older Adult Speakers

    Amy B. Wohlert;Anne Smith

  • Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

    Lindsey Olander;Anne Smith;Howard N. Zelaznik

  • The control of orofacial movements in speech.

    Anne Smith

  • Atypical neural functions underlying phonological processing and silent rehearsal in children who stutter

    Christine Weber-Fox;John E. Spruill;Rebecca M. C. Spencer;Anne Smith

  • Phonologic Processing in Adults Who Stutter: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence.

    Christine Weber-Fox;Rebecca M. C. Spencer;John E. Spruill;Anne Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard N. Zelaznik
Howard N. Zelaznik Purdue University West Lafayette
Elizabeth A. Franz
Elizabeth A. Franz University of Otago
Rebecca M. C. Spencer
Rebecca M. C. Spencer University of Massachusetts Amherst
Chi Hwan Lee
Chi Hwan Lee Purdue University West Lafayette
Shreyas Sen
Shreyas Sen Purdue University West Lafayette
Muhammad A. Alam
Muhammad A. Alam Purdue University West Lafayette
Gary Weismer
Gary Weismer University of Wisconsin–Madison
John N. Caviness
John N. Caviness Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Anne Smith

Trending Scientists