World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Phillip M. Fedorak

Phillip M. Fedorak

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
12773
World Ranking
6712
National Ranking
178

Phillip M. Fedorak publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip M. Fedorak sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 164 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Phillip M. Fedorak D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip M. Fedorak sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phillip M. Fedorak is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. The available data does not provide specific details on their published research papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues.

There is no detailed information regarding the main or subfields of study attributed to Phillip M. Fedorak, nor specific topics covered in their research work. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been recorded in the presented data.

Given the current information, the profile highlights the association with the University of Alberta as a primary institutional affiliation without further elaboration on research contributions or academic collaborations.

Best Publications

  • A review of the occurrence, analyses, toxicity, and biodegradation of naphthenic acids.

    Joyce S. Clemente;Phillip M. Fedorak

  • Characterization of naphthenic acids in oil sands wastewaters by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    Fervone M Holowenko;Michael D MacKinnon;Phillip M Fedorak

  • Naphthenic acids and other acid-extractables in water samples from Alberta: what is being measured?

    David M. Grewer;Rozlyn F. Young;Randy M. Whittal;Phillip M. Fedorak

  • Naphthenic acids in athabasca oil sands tailings waters are less biodegradable than commercial naphthenic acids.

    Angela C. Scott;Michael D. Mackinnon;Phillip M. Fedorak

  • Biodegradation of naphthenic acids by microbial populations indigenous to oil sands tailings

    David C. Herman;Phillip M. Fedorak;Mike D. MacKinnon;J. W. Costerton

  • The effects of phenol and some alkyl phenolics on batch anaerobic methanogenesis

    Phillip M. Fedorak;Steve E. Hrudey

  • Ozonation of oil sands process water removes naphthenic acids and toxicity.

    Angela C. Scott;Warren Zubot;Michael D. MacKinnon;Daniel W. Smith

  • Methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in oil sands fine tailings waste

    Fervone M Holowenko;Michael D MacKinnon;Phillip M Fedorak

  • Influence of molecular structure on the biodegradability of naphthenic acids.

    Xiumei Han;Angela C. Scott;Phillip M. Fedorak;Mahmoud Bataineh

  • A review of the occurrence, toxicity, and biodegradation of condensed thiophenes found in petroleum

    Kevin G Kropp;Phillip M Fedorak

  • Biodegradation of short-chain n-alkanes in oil sands tailings under methanogenic conditions.

    Tariq Siddique;Phillip M. Fedorak;Julia M. Foght

  • Naphthenic acids and surrogate naphthenic acids in methanogenic microcosms.

    Fervone M Holowenko;Michael D MacKinnon;Phillip M Fedorak

  • Aerobic biodegradation of two commercial naphthenic acids preparations.

    Joyce S. Clemente;Michael D. Mackinnon;Phillip M. Fedorak

  • A statistical comparison of naphthenic acids characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    Joyce S Clemente;N.G.N Prasad;Michael D MacKinnon;Phillip M Fedorak

  • Ozonation of oil sands process-affected water accelerates microbial bioremediation.

    Jonathan W. Martin;Thaer Barri;Xiumei Han;Phillip M. Fedorak

  • Metabolism of BTEX and naphtha compounds to methane in oil sands tailings.

    Tariq Siddique;Phillip M. Fedorak;Michael D. Mackinnon;Julia M. Foght

  • Lignin Peroxidase Oxidation of Aromatic Compounds in Systems Containing Organic Solvents

    Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt;Donald W. S. Westlake;Phillip M. Fedorak

  • Capillary HPLC/QTOF-MS for characterizing complex naphthenic acid mixtures and their microbial transformation.

    M Bataineh;A C Scott;P M Fedorak;J W Martin

  • Methanogenic Degradation of Poly(3-Hydroxyalkanoates)

    Karen Budwill;Phillip M. Fedorak;William J. Page

  • Distribution of hydrogenase genes in Desulfovibrio spp. and their use in identification of species from the oil field environment.

    G. Voordouw;V. Niviere;F.G. Ferris;P.M. Fedorak

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia M. Foght
Julia M. Foght University of Alberta
Steve E. Hrudey
Steve E. Hrudey University of Alberta
Murray R. Gray
Murray R. Gray University of Alberta
Michael D. MacKinnon
Michael D. MacKinnon Syncrude (Canada)
Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt
Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt National Autonomous University of Mexico
Jonathan W. Martin
Jonathan W. Martin Stockholm University
Peter M. Huck
Peter M. Huck University of Waterloo
Gerrit Voordouw
Gerrit Voordouw University of Calgary
Jacob H. Masliyah
Jacob H. Masliyah University of Alberta
Ellie E. Prepas
Ellie E. Prepas Lakehead University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing careers related to Chemistry, online programs in forensic and criminal justice fields offer valuable opportunities to specialize. Many professionals find that combining a solid chemistry foundation with forensic science expertise unlocks diverse career paths.

Exploring forensic psychology master's programs online can provide a unique understanding of the behavioral aspects relevant to criminal investigations. This knowledge complements the technical skills gained through chemistry studies.

Those curious about job prospects should examine various forensic science careers, which often demand strong analytical chemistry skills combined with criminal justice knowledge. These roles are critical in legal and investigative settings.

Understanding the financial aspect is essential, so prospective students should research criminal justice degree cost to plan their education efficiently. Additionally, starting with a 2 year criminal justice degree online can be a cost-effective way to enter the field while building a strong academic foundation.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip M. Fedorak

Recently Published Articles