World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
15476
World Ranking
2586
National Ranking
199

Peter L. Read publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter L. Read sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 438 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter L. Read D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter L. Read sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter L. Read is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected domains within physics and earth sciences, focusing primarily on planetary atmospheres and fluid dynamics. Their publication record includes a range of scientific articles addressing atmospheric and planetary phenomena, with work published in diverse venues such as "Nonlinear processes in geophysics" and "Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics."

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter L. Read include:

  • Baroclinic and barotropic instabilities in planetary atmospheres: energetics, equilibration and adjustment (2020), published in Nonlinear processes in geophysics
  • The Dynamics of Jupiter's and Saturn's Weather Layers: A Synthesis After Cassini and Juno (2023), published in Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter L. Read are listed as:

  • Roland Young
  • Neil T. Lewis
  • Simon Cabanes
  • Juan M. Lora
  • Stefania Espa

The scientist's body of work appears mainly in publication venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
  • Nonlinear processes in geophysics

Peter L. Read's research contributions are primarily situated within the fields of study:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Subfields of study presenting significant engagement include:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change

Key topics covered in their work are:

  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Space Exploration and Technology
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements

Best Publications

  • Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective

    Terry Barker;Igor Bashmakov;Awwad Alharthi;Markus Ammann

  • Improved general circulation models of the Martian atmosphere from the surface to above 80 km

    François Forget;Frédéric Hourdin;Richard Fournier;Christophe Hourdin

  • Titan's atmospheric temperatures, winds, and composition

    F. M. Flasar;R. K. Achterberg;B. J. Conrath;P. J. Gierasch

  • A climate database for Mars

    Stephen R. Lewis;Matthew Collins;Peter L. Read;François Forget

  • Exploring The Saturn System In The Thermal Infrared: The Composite Infrared Spectrometer

    F. M. Flasar;V. G. Kunde;M. M. Abbas;R. K. Achterberg

  • Mars Climate Sounder: An investigation of thermal and water vapor structure, dust and condensate distributions in the atmosphere, and energy balance of the polar regions

    D. J. McCleese;J. T. Schofield;F. W. Taylor;S. B. Calcutt

  • Modeling the Martian dust cycle, 1. Representations of dust transport processes

    Claire E. Newman;Stephen R. Lewis;Peter L. Read;François Forget

  • Structure and dynamics of the Martian lower and middle atmosphere as observed by the Mars Climate Sounder: Seasonal variations in zonal mean temperature, dust and water ice aerosols

    D. J. McCleese;N. G. Heavens;J. T. Schofield;W. A. Abdou

  • Temperatures, Winds, and Composition in the Saturnian System

    F. M. Flasar;R. K. Achterberg;B. J. Conrath;J. C. Pearl

  • The Martian climate revisited : atmosphere and environment of a desert planet

    Peter L. Read;Stephen R. Lewis

  • Modeling the Martian dust cycle 2. Multiannual radiatively active dust transport simulations

    Claire E. Newman;Stephen R. Lewis;Peter L. Read;François Forget

  • THE MARTIAN ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER

    A. Petrosyan;B. Galperin;S. E. Larsen;S. Lewis

  • The Atmospheric Dynamics of Venus

    Agustín Sánchez-Lavega;Sebastien Lebonnois;Takeshi Imamura;Peter Read

  • The Mars Climate Database (MCD version 5.2)

    E. Millour;Francois Forget;Aymeric Spiga;T. Navarro

  • Dynamics of Jupiter's atmosphere

    Andrew P. Ingersoll;Timothy E. Dowling;Peter J. Gierasch;Glenn S. Orton

  • Assimilation of thermal emission spectrometer atmospheric data during the Mars Global Surveyor aerobraking period

    Stephen R. Lewis;Peter L. Read;Barney J. Conrath;John C. Pearl

  • Anisotropic turbulence and zonal jets in rotating flows with a β-effect

    B. Galperin;S. Sukoriansky;N. Dikovskaya;P. L. Read

  • Temperature and Composition of Saturn's Polar Hot Spots and Hexagon

    L. N. Fletcher;P. G. J. Irwin;G. S. Orton;N. A. Teanby

  • Saturn’s rotation period from its atmospheric planetary-wave configuration

    P. L. Read;T. E. Dowling;G. Schubert

  • An intense stratospheric jet on Jupiter

    F. M. Flasar;V. G. Kunde;R. K. Achterberg;B. J. Conrath

  • The Mars Climate Database (MCD version 5.3)

    Ehouarn Millour;Francois Forget;Aymeric Spiga;Margaux Vals

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen R. Lewis
Stephen R. Lewis The Open University
Miguel Lopez-Valverde
Miguel Lopez-Valverde Spanish National Research Council
Fredric W. Taylor
Fredric W. Taylor University of Oxford
François Forget
François Forget Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Barney J. Conrath
Barney J. Conrath Cornell University
Peter J. Gierasch
Peter J. Gierasch Cornell University
Leigh N. Fletcher
Leigh N. Fletcher University of Leicester
Patrick G. J. Irwin
Patrick G. J. Irwin University of Oxford
Franck Lefèvre
Franck Lefèvre Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Aymeric Spiga
Aymeric Spiga Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences, expanding expertise through related degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis, making it valuable to explore the best gis graduate programs. These programs equip graduates with essential mapping and spatial data skills needed for environmental management and conservation.

Another relevant pathway is public administration, especially for roles involving environmental policy and sustainable development. Online options like the best online masters in public administration offer flexibility while preparing students for leadership positions in government and non-profit sectors.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is also vital in environmental sciences. An online sociology degree bachelors can provide insights into social dynamics and environmental justice issues, enhancing the ability to implement community-based solutions.

For professionals aiming to advance in academia or educational leadership related to environmental topics, a doctoral degree without the traditional dissertation demands may be appealing. The online edd no dissertation programs offer alternatives that balance research and practical application, helping educators effect change on a broader scale.

Best Scientists Citing Peter L. Read

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles