World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6426
World Ranking
7882
National Ranking
50

Patrick M. Fisher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 126 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Patrick M. Fisher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick M. Fisher is affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Within these broad areas, Fisher's work emphasizes subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their scientific inquiries center around several core topics. These include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Psychedelics and Drug Studies, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Treatment of Major Depression, Mental Health Research Topics, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, and Tryptophan and Brain Disorders.

Fisher has published extensively, contributing to numerous research articles. Among the recent papers are:

  • A single psilocybin dose is associated with long-term increased mindfulness, preceded by a proportional change in neocortical 5-HT2A receptor binding (2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology)
  • Exenatide once weekly for alcohol use disorder investigated in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (2022, JCI Insight)
  • Psilocybin-induced changes in brain network integrity and segregation correlate with plasma psilocin level and psychedelic experience (2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology)
  • Psychedelic resting-state neuroimaging: A review and perspective on balancing replication and novel analyses (2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Brain serotonin 2A receptor binding predicts subjective temporal and mystical effects of psilocybin in healthy humans (2020, Journal of Psychopharmacology)

The primary venues where Fisher has published include Neuroscience Applied, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Psychopharmacology, and Human Brain Mapping. These journals reflect an ongoing engagement with interdisciplinary studies linking neuropharmacology and clinical applications.

Fisher frequently collaborates with several coauthors, notably Gitte M. Knudsen, Brice Ozenne, Dea Siggaard Stenbæk, Vibe G. Frøkjær, and M. Madsen. Such collaboration networks suggest active involvement in multi-author neuropsychopharmacological research projects.

Best Publications

  • Altered Striatal Activation Predicting Real-World Positive Affect in Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

    Erika E. Forbes;Ahmad R. Hariri;B.A. Samantha L. Martin;Jennifer S. Silk

  • Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor occupancy and plasma psilocin levels.

    Martin K. Madsen;Patrick M. Fisher;Daniel Burmester;Daniel Burmester;Agnete Dyssegaard

  • A High-Resolution In Vivo Atlas of the Human Brain's Serotonin System.

    Vincent Beliveau;Melanie Ganz;Ling Feng;Brice Ozenne

  • Cortical surface-based analysis reduces bias and variance in kinetic modeling of brain PET data.

    Douglas N. Greve;Claus Svarer;Patrick M. Fisher;Ling Feng

  • FKBP5 and emotional neglect interact to predict individual differences in amygdala reactivity

    Michael G. White;Ryan Bogdan;Patrick M. Fisher;Karen Muñoz

  • Effects of HTR1A C(−1019)G on Amygdala Reactivity and Trait Anxiety

    Eric Fakra;Luke W. Hyde;Adam Gorka;Patrick M. Fisher

  • Acute 5-HT Reuptake Blockade Potentiates Human Amygdala Reactivity

    Kristin L Bigos;Bruce G Pollock;Bruce G Pollock;Howard J Aizenstein;Patrick M Fisher

  • Capacity for 5-HT1A-mediated autoregulation predicts amygdala reactivity.

    P M Fisher;C C Meltzer;C C Meltzer;S K Ziolko;J C Price

  • A single psilocybin dose is associated with long-term increased mindfulness, preceded by a proportional change in neocortical 5-HT2A receptor binding.

    Martin Korsbak Madsen;Patrick MacDonald Fisher;Dea Siggaard Stenbæk;Sara Kristiansen

  • Medial Prefrontal Cortex 5-HT2A Density Is Correlated with Amygdala Reactivity, Response Habituation, and Functional Coupling

    Patrick M. Fisher;Carolyn C. Meltzer;Julie C. Price;Rhaven L. Coleman

  • Psychedelic resting-state neuroimaging: A review and perspective on balancing replication and novel analyses

    Unknown

  • Psilocybin-induced changes in brain network integrity and segregation correlate with plasma psilocin level and psychedelic experience.

    Martin K Madsen;Dea S Stenbæk;Albin Arvidsson;Sophia Armand

  • Interaction between trait anxiety and trait anger predict amygdala reactivity to angry facial expressions in men but not women

    Justin M. Carré;Patrick M. Fisher;Stephen B. Manuck;Ahmad R. Hariri

  • The Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging (Cimbi) database

    Gitte Moos Knudsen;Peter S. Jensen;David Erritzoe;William F. C. Baaré

  • Functional connectivity of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei at rest

    Vincent Beliveau;Claus Svarer;Vibe G. Frokjaer;Gitte Moos Knudsen

  • Age, Sex, and Reproductive Hormone Effects on Brain Serotonin-1A and Serotonin-2A Receptor Binding in a Healthy Population

    Eydie L Moses-Kolko;Julie C Price;Nilesh Shah;Sarah Berga

  • Central 5-HT4 receptor binding as biomarker of serotonergic tonus in humans: a [11C]SB207145 PET study.

    M. E. Haahr;P. M. Fisher;C. G. Jensen;V. G. Frokjaer

  • Recreational use of psychedelics is associated with elevated personality trait openness: Exploration of associations with brain serotonin markers:

    David Erritzoe;James Smith;Patrick M Fisher;Robin Carhart-Harris

  • Violent offenders respond to provocations with high amygdala and striatal reactivity.

    Sofi da Cunha-Bang;Sofi da Cunha-Bang;Patrick M. Fisher;Liv Vadskjær Hjordt;Liv Vadskjær Hjordt;Erik Perfalk;Erik Perfalk

  • Brain serotonin 2A receptor binding predicts subjective temporal and mystical effects of psilocybin in healthy humans

    Dea Siggaard Stenbæk;Martin Korsbak Madsen;Martin Korsbak Madsen;Brice Ozenne;Brice Ozenne;Sara Kristiansen

  • The 5-HT4 receptor levels in hippocampus correlates inversely with memory test performance in humans

    Mette Ewers Haahr;Patrick Fisher;Klaus Holst;Karine Madsen

  • FEATURE ARTICLE Medial Prefrontal Cortex 5-HT2A Density Is Correlated with Amygdala Reactivity, Response Habituation, and Functional Coupling

    Patrick M. Fisher;Carolyn C. Meltzer;Julie C. Price;Rhaven L. Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Claus Svarer
Claus Svarer Copenhagen University Hospital
Ahmad R. Hariri
Ahmad R. Hariri Duke University
Carolyn C. Meltzer
Carolyn C. Meltzer Emory University
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
David Erritzoe
David Erritzoe Imperial College London
Sarah L. Berga
Sarah L. Berga University at Buffalo, State University of New York
William F.C. Baaré
William F.C. Baaré Copenhagen University Hospital
Kamilla W. Miskowiak
Kamilla W. Miskowiak Copenhagen University Hospital
Lars Vedel Kessing
Lars Vedel Kessing University of Copenhagen
Paul Cumming
Paul Cumming Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're passionate about neuroscience but also interested in broader fields of mental health and human behavior, there are several related online degree options worth exploring. Careers in neuroscience can often cross over with counseling, psychology, and therapy roles, especially in settings where helping individuals is a primary focus.

Online programs now offer flexible pathways to these professions. Choosing from cacrep accredited online counseling programs means receiving a credential recognized nationwide for high ethical and academic standards. Many students opt for a masters in counseling to gain advanced, practical skills for individual or group counseling careers.

Those drawn to working with families or couples may benefit from pursuing a family therapy degree, which prepares graduates for licensure and specialized roles in mental health. For a broader understanding of human behavior, a masters in psychology online is a versatile choice that can lead to research, teaching, or clinical opportunities. Each path provides a valuable complement to a neuroscience background and offers a range of rewarding career options.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick M. Fisher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles