World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 90 288 27 240 20621

Otto L. Lange publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Otto L. Lange between 1953 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Otto L. Lange published across 73 years, from 1953 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1987. 1 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1953 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1987. 1953: 1 publication 1954: 1 publication 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 3 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 4 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 2 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 5 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 9 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 9 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 19 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1953 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Otto L. Lange: publications per year, 1953 to 2025
Year Publications
1953 1
1954 1
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 3
1960 1
1961 1
1962 0
1963 1
1964 0
1965 4
1966 2
1967 1
1968 2
1969 3
1970 5
1971 4
1972 9
1973 3
1974 4
1975 9
1976 5
1977 3
1978 0
1979 5
1980 9
1981 4
1982 7
1983 3
1984 4
1985 10
1986 10
1987 19
1988 4
1989 13
1990 11
1991 9
1992 5
1993 8
1994 5
1995 6
1996 5
1997 6
1998 5
1999 3
2000 3
2001 6
2002 2
2003 5
2004 4
2005 5
2006 3
2007 1
2008 2
2009 1
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 3
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 256
Download as CSV

Otto L. Lange publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Otto L. Lange sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 236–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 240 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64 240
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Otto L. Lange D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Otto L. Lange sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18 90
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Photosynthesis

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Photosynthesis, Lichen, Thallus and Water content. Otto L. Lange regularly links together related areas like Horticulture in his Botany studies. Otto L. Lange focuses mostly in the field of Horticulture, narrowing it down to topics relating to Compensation point and, in certain cases, Fagaceae.

His Photosynthesis research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ecology, Carbon dioxide, Algae and Atmospheric sciences. The Thallus study combines topics in areas such as Productivity, Dry weight, Green algae and Pseudocyphellaria. His Transpiration study combines topics in areas such as Valerianella, Xylem, Agronomy and Prunus armeniaca.

His most cited work include:

  • Responses of stomata to changes in humidity. (376 citations)
  • Water vapor uptake and photosynthesis of lichens: performance differences in species with green and blue-green algae as phycobionts. (288 citations)
  • Stomatal responses to changes in humidity in plants growing in the desert. (264 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Botany, Photosynthesis, Lichen, Ecology and Thallus. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Horticulture and Arbutus unedo. His Photosynthesis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Respiration, Carbon dioxide, Atmospheric sciences and Water content.

His Lichen research includes themes of Productivity, Green algae and Desiccation. His Thallus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Photosynthetically active radiation, Algae, Dry weight, Pseudocyphellaria and Rainforest. The study incorporates disciplines such as Prunus armeniaca, Agronomy, Evergreen and Stomatal conductance in addition to Transpiration.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (57.14%)
  • Photosynthesis (49.78%)
  • Lichen (33.77%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1995-2017)?

  • Botany (57.14%)
  • Lichen (33.77%)
  • Photosynthesis (49.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Lichen, Photosynthesis, Ecology and Thallus. Botany is closely attributed to Water content in his work. His work carried out in the field of Water content brings together such families of science as Foliose lichen and Horticulture.

His study in the fields of Cyanolichen, Buellia frigida and Xanthoria under the domain of Lichen overlaps with other disciplines such as Term. His study in Photosynthesis is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Rainforest, Desiccation, Chlorophyll and Respiration. The concepts of his Thallus study are interwoven with issues in Cladonia furcata, Carbon dioxide, Trampling and Crustose.

Between 1995 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Photosynthesis of the cyanobacterial soil‐crust lichen Collema tenax from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange (165 citations)
  • A history of atmospheric CO[2] and its effects on plants, animals, and ecosystems (108 citations)
  • Photosynthesis of Lichens from Antarctica (99 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Photosynthesis

Otto L. Lange spends much of his time researching Botany, Photosynthesis, Lichen, Chlorophyll fluorescence and Photosystem II. Otto L. Lange interconnects Environmental chemistry and Water content in the investigation of issues within Botany. His Water content study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Photosynthetic capacity and Compensation point.

His research in Photosynthesis intersects with topics in Desiccation and Thallus. Otto L. Lange usually deals with Lichen and limits it to topics linked to Respiration and Acclimatization, Peltigera and Carbon fixation. His studies deal with areas such as Biophysics and Chlorophyll as well as Photosystem II.

Best Publications

  • Responses of stomata to changes in humidity.

    O. L. Lange;R. Lösch;Ernst Detlef Schulze;L. Kappen

  • Biological Soil Crusts: Characteristics and Distribution

    Jayne Belnap;B. Budel;Otto L. Lange

  • Water vapor uptake and photosynthesis of lichens: performance differences in species with green and blue-green algae as phycobionts.

    O. L. Lange;E. Kilian;H. Ziegler

  • Taxonomic composition and photosynthetic characteristics of the biological soil crusts covering sand dunes in the western Negev Desert

    O. L. Lange;G. J. Kidron;B. Büdel;A. Meyer

  • Stomatal responses to changes in humidity in plants growing in the desert.

    Ernst Detlef Schulze;O. L. Lange;O. L. Lange;U. Buschbom;U. Buschbom;L. Kappen;L. Kappen

  • Plant response to stress

    John D. Tenhunen;Fernando M. Catarino;Otto L. Lange;Walter C. Oechel

  • Changes in photosynthetic capacity, carboxylation efficiency, and CO2 compensation point associated with midday stomatal closure and midday depression of net CO2 exchange of leaves of Quercus suber.

    J D Tenhunen;O L Lange;J Gebel;W Beyschlag

  • Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, photon yield of O2 evolution, photosynthetic capacity, and carotenoid composition during the midday depression of net CO2 uptake in Arbutus unedo growing in Portugal

    Barbara Demmig-Adams;William W. Adams;Klaus Winter;Angelika Meyer

  • Photosynthesis of the cyanobacterial soil‐crust lichen Collema tenax from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange

    Otto L. Lange;Jayne Belnap;H. Reichenberger

  • Xylem-tapping mistletoes: water or nutrient parasites?

    J. R. Ehleringer;E. D. Schulze;H. Ziegler;O. L. Lange

  • Water and Plant Life

    O. L. Lange;L. Kappen;Ernst Detlef Schulze

  • Biological Soil Crusts and Ecosystem Nitrogen and Carbon Dynamics

    R. D. Evans;O. L. Lange

  • Photosynthesis and water relations of lichen soil crusts: field measurements in the coastal fog zone of the Namib Desert

    O. L. Lange;A. Meyer;H. Zellner;U. Heber

  • Current Perspectives of Steady-state Stomatal Responses to Environment

    A. E. Hall;Ernst Detlef Schulze;O. L. Lange

  • Determination of leaf heat resistance: comparative investigation of chlorophyll fluorescence changes and tissue necrosis methods

    H. W. Bilger;U. Schreiber;O. L. Lange

  • A history of atmospheric CO[2] and its effects on plants, animals, and ecosystems

    I.T. Baldwin;M.M. Caldwell;G. Heldmaier;Robert B. Jackson

  • Photosynthesis in Poikilohydric Plants: A Comparison of Lichens and Bryophytes

    T. G. A. Green;O. L. Lange

  • Photosynthesis of Soil-Crust Biota as Dependent on Environmental Factors

    Unknown

  • The role of air humidity and leaf temperature in controlling stomatal resistance of Prunus armeniaca L. under desert conditions : I. A simulation of the daily course of stomatal resistance.

    Ernst Detlef Schulze;O. L. Lange;M. Evenari;L. Kappen

  • Effect of high light on the efficiency of photochemical energy conversion in a variety of lichen species with green and blue-green phycobionts.

    Barbara Demmig-Adams;Cristina Máguas;William W. Adams;Angelika Meyer

  • The role of air humidity and leaf temperature in controlling stomatal resistance of Prunus armeniaca L. under desert conditions : II. The significance of leaf water status and internal carbon dioxide concentration.

    Ernst Detlef Schulze;O. L. Lange;L. Kappen;M. Evenari

  • Stomatal responses to changes in temperature at increasing water stress.

    Ernst Detlef Schulze;O. L. Lange;O. L. Lange;L. Kappen;L. Kappen;U. Buschbom;U. Buschbom

  • Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Lichens Containing Green and Blue‐Green Algae During Hydration by Water Vapor Uptake and by Addition of Liquid Water*

    O. L. Lange;W. Bilger;S. Rimke;U. Schreiber

  • Further evidence that activation of net photosynthesis by dry cyanobacterial lichens requires liquid water

    O.L. Lange;B. Büdel;A. Meyer;E. Kilian

  • Water status related photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination in species of the lichen genusPseudocyphellaria with green or blue-green photobionts and in photosymbiodemes.

    O. L. Lange;T. G. A. Green;H. Ziegler

  • Differences in the capacity for radiationless energy dissipation in the photochemical apparatus of green and blue-green algal lichens associated with differences in carotenoid composition

    Barbara Demmig-Adams;William W. Adams;Franz-C. Czygan;Ulrich Schreiber

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst-Detlef Schulze
Ernst-Detlef Schulze Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Ludger Kappen
Ludger Kappen Kiel University
John Tenhunen
John Tenhunen University of Bayreuth
Burkhard Büdel
Burkhard Büdel Technical University of Kaiserslautern
T.G. Allan Green
T.G. Allan Green University of Waikato
Jayne Belnap
Jayne Belnap United States Geological Survey
Peter Proksch
Peter Proksch Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Barbara Demmig-Adams
Barbara Demmig-Adams University of Colorado Boulder
William W. Adams
William W. Adams University of Colorado Boulder
Ulrich Heber
Ulrich Heber University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Otto L. Lange