World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
6106
World Ranking
7465
National Ranking
2659

Thomas H. Nash publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Nash sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 170 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas H. Nash D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Nash sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas H. Nash is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their primary research contributions lie within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Anthropology, and Geochemistry and Petrology.

Their research topics encompass a broad range of subjects that include:

  • Lichen and fungal ecology
  • Mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions
  • Botany and plant ecology studies
  • Archaeology and natural history
  • Botany, ecology, and taxonomy studies
  • Geological modeling and analysis

Several recent publications authored or co-authored by Thomas H. Nash illustrate their active engagement with these research domains. Notable papers include:

  • "Envisioning Regenerative Communities," 2021, published in Counterfutures
  • "Lichenicolous Fungi in WIS," 2021, published in Evansia
  • "THE SURFICIAL GEOLOGY AND BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, OHIO," 2022, published in Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

The scholar has collaborated with several researchers, with Camia Young being a frequent co-author. The publication venues where Thomas H. Nash's work appears reflect a diverse engagement with both specialized and interdisciplinary platforms. These venues include:

  • Counterfutures
  • Evansia
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Best Publications

  • Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region

    T.H. Nash;B.D. Ryan;C. Gries;F. Bungartz

  • Desiccation-Tolerance in Lichens: A Review

    Ilse Kranner;Richard Beckett;Ayala Hochman;Thomas H. Nash

  • Lichens as Indicators of Air Pollution

    Thomas H. Nash

  • The Influence of Epiphytic Lichens on the Nutrient Cycling of an Oak Woodland

    Johannes M. H. Knops;Thomas H. Nash;William H. Schlesinger

  • Lichens, bryophytes, and air quality

    Thomas H. Nash Iii;Volkmar Wirth

  • MINERAL CYCLING AND EPIPHYTIC LICHENS: IMPLICATIONS AT THE ECOSYSTEM LEVEL

    J. M. H. Knops;T. H. Nash;V. L. Boucher;W. H. Schlesinger

  • Lichen Communities on Conifers in Southern California Mountains: An Ecological Survey Relative to Oxidant Air Pollution

    Lorene L. Sigal;Thomas H. Nash

  • Influence of Effluents from a Zinc Factory on Lichens

    Thomas H. Nash

  • The chemosystematics of the lichen genus Pertusaria in North America north of Mexico

    Thomas H. Nash;M. J. Dibben

  • The effect of atmospheric desiccation and osmotic water stress on photosynthesis and dark respiration of lichens

    T. H. Nash;A. Reiner;B. Demmig‐Adams;E. Kilian

  • Fungal communities of lichen-dominated biological soil crusts: Diversity, relative microbial biomass, and their relationship to disturbance and crust cover

    Scott T. Bates;Scott T. Bates;Thomas H. Nash;Ken G. Sweat;Ferran Garcia-Pichel

  • The carbon economy of lichens

    Kristin Palmqvist;Lena Dahlman;Anna Jonsson;T.H. Nash

  • Lichen and Moss Distribution and Biomass in Hot Desert Ecosystems

    T. H. Nash;S. L. White;J. E. Marsh

  • The use of lichens in atmospheric deposition studies with an emphasis on the Arctic

    Thomas H. Nash;Corinna Gries

  • Historical and current atmospheric deposition to the epilithic lichen Xanthoparmelia in Maricopa County, Arizona.

    T. Zschau;S. Getty;S. Getty;C. Gries;Y. Ameron

  • Eutrophic lichens respond to multiple forms of N: implications for critical levels and critical loads research.

    Unknown

  • Seasonal variation of elemental status in the lichen Ramalina menziesii tayl. From two sites in southern California: Evidence for dry deposition accumulation

    Kansri Boonpragob;Thomas H. Nash

  • On Lichenicolous fungi from Continental North America

    D. Triebel;G. Rambold;T. H. Nash

  • Sensitivity of Lichens to Sulfur Dioxide

    Thomas H. Nash

  • On the relationship between nutrient use efficiency and fertility in forest ecosystems.

    Johannes M. H. Knops;Walter D. Koenig;Thomas H. Nash

  • Hybocarpone, a novel cytotoxic naphthazarin derivative from mycobiont cultures of the lichen Lecanora hybocarpa

    Michael A. Ernst-Russell;John A. Elix;Christina L.L. Chai;Anthony C. Willis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen Kesselmeier
Jürgen Kesselmeier Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
H. Thorsten Lumbsch
H. Thorsten Lumbsch Field Museum of Natural History
Harrie J. M. Sipman
Harrie J. M. Sipman Freie Universität Berlin
Otto L. Lange
Otto L. Lange University of Würzburg
William H. Schlesinger
William H. Schlesinger Duke University
Johannes M. H. Knops
Johannes M. H. Knops Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
Burkhard Büdel
Burkhard Büdel Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Anthony C. Willis
Anthony C. Willis Australian National University
Ludger Kappen
Ludger Kappen Kiel University
Kristin Palmqvist
Kristin Palmqvist Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis, and pursuing one of the best gis undergraduate programs equips students with essential skills in spatial data management and environmental mapping.

Leadership and policy are pivotal in shaping sustainable environmental practices. An online Master of Public Administration (MPA) offers pathways into public sector roles where one-year completion options like those detailed in the 1 year mpa online programs allow for a rapid transition into environmental policy and management.

Understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues is equally important. An online sociology degree provides insights into community dynamics and human behavior, with several reputable online sociology bachelor programs designed for flexibility and depth.

For advanced research and leadership roles, pursuing doctoral studies such as the efficient 1 year phd programs online no dissertation can be attractive. These programs emphasize applied knowledge without extensive dissertation requirements, enabling professionals to enhance expertise while maintaining career momentum.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas H. Nash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles